[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6549473 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 441: Less Pressure - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #57 (isolation #6) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:41 am
Postby Pine »
In post 43, TellTaleHeart wrote:If people other than xRECKONERx don't speak up, I'm going to start posting the Star Trek / King of the Hill crossover erotica I wrote.
Post
Post #87 (isolation #8) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:22 pm
Postby Pine »
Of course the push is weak. We're three pages into the game, when you discount the opening posts. Any push is weak at this point, in part because you haven't posted enough to make a full case against. You've done like, two things, no I find them both scummy. Expecting more is ludicrous
Post
Post #89 (isolation #9) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:36 pm
Postby Pine »
Whoa misrep
Confident in interpretation, but evidence is thin. Evidence on anyone is thin at is time, but abdicating responsibility for your vote while slipping quietly onto a flash wagon is just not Town-intentioned
Because I operate selfishly when I play mafia and it's much easier for me to glean reads off of people attacking me than off of people attacking other people, and nobody's going to attack me if I'm IC.
In post 89, Pine wrote: but abdicating responsibility for your vote while slipping quietly onto a flash wagon is just not Town-intentioned
What would you expect me to do as town in that situation if you are my top suspect?
"Top suspect?" How can you even have a "top suspect" in post 16? No one had made any posts of substance. All I'd posted was two jokes. On page one.
No, you were making an easy, scummy vote, while at the same time setting up an "I'm not responsible" excuse for when I flip Town. Now you're blustering and making excuses for past actions
That's a scum tactic. Page 43 of the handbook, I think
Post
Post #209 (isolation #14) » Thu Feb 05, 2015 7:24 am
Postby Pine »
I could vote ++--
Just reread their ISO, looks shifty and disingenuous to me
Dry Fit is worse though. Continued attempts to avoid takin responsibility for his own reads, obvious attempts to hedge when he knows people will flip Town, buddying ICs, etc
Yeah, I can see a DF/++-- team. Jury's out on the third
In post 224, Pine wrote:Dry-Fit or ++--, I could see Huntress. Her votes have been pretty bad
So you think my voting for the two people you think are scum is bad? Only other person I've voted is you so I can understand you might not like that.
Not the votes themselves, per se, but your reasoning and timing have felt quite a bit off. It's a common scum assertion that, just because they've voted scummy people, that that automatically makes their reasons scummy. It ain't true
I haven't gotten much significant vibe from Xayzeck. Sell me on why he's scummy?