Mini 1636: Mafialand Mayhem! - [Game Over]

[Wake1]

Aeronaut

,

Luca

,

Katie

,

Aneninen

&

MonkeyMan

: What do you guys think and feel regarding 46?

I'd like to lean on you guys and have your input, including anyone else here who wants to work together as a team.

[Lapsa]

beautiful kitty, Aneninen

[llll]

Vote: BP

for environmental vandalism, and hiding/not confirming. Wake, you're clearly here. Did you forget to confirm your role PM to Riddleton?

[Wake1]

Wake, you're clearly here. Did you forget to confirm your role PM to Riddleton?

With ten of thirteen already confirmed, it no longer became necessary.

[llll]

I think Riddleton disagrees. I am 11th to confirm, and he bolded my name after I confirmed. Just do it.

[curiouskarmadog]

Aeronaut

,

Luca

,

Katie

,

Aneninen

&

MonkeyMan

: What do you guys think and feel regarding 46?

I'd like to lean on you guys and have your input, including anyone else here who wants to work together as a team.

how do you define fluff?

[curiouskarmadog]

vote ollie

clearly lurking.

slowly turning into a real vote.

[curiouskarmadog]

vote ollie

clearly lurking.

slowly turning into a real vote.

he has posted 4 times today, 10 times yesterday, he has confirmed is role here, but is not posting here.

hurry up Ollie...I want to see that "I forgot about this game post".

[Wake1]

Aeronaut

,

Luca

,

Katie

,

Aneninen

&

MonkeyMan

: What do you guys think and feel regarding 46?

I'd like to lean on you guys and have your input, including anyone else here who wants to work together as a team.

how do you define fluff?

Personally, I define fluff as posts that don't really have much if anything to do with the game at hand. Like discussing jam recipes within an active Mafia game.

That said, I don't think all fluffiness should be outlawed. Some fluff is alright, so long as it stays within reason.

[Lapsa]

@Wake88 and how do you define reason?

[Wake1]

@Wake88 and how do you define reason?

Please answer 46 first.

[Lapsa]

Please answer 46 first.

to watch you asking

your turn

[Riddleton]

Wake, you're clearly here. Did you forget to confirm your role PM to Riddleton?

With ten of thirteen already confirmed, it no longer became necessary.

I would appreciate it if you confirm. It's just a minor formality. Thanks!

[Wake1]

/confirm.

[Luca Blight]

(..) Would you be willing to give a rough estimate of how many years you've been playing? (..)

Do you, perhaps, have any slight reads on anyone as of yet? Maybe you have a bit of insider knowledge on someone's meta here?

(..) However, my memory on the details is foggy. As time wears on the memory fades ever so slightly.

you can call me Lapsa88

vote on Aneninen because of fluff

vote on Aeronaut because of doubling on you

zero insider knowledge

thing in common - can't remember losing my memory

I find it ironic how Lapsa voted Anen for posting fluff, given Lapsa have posted more fluff than everyone else combined so far.

Also, the example of fluff you gave as your reasoning for voting Anen came after your vote, so clearly you saying that wasn't genuine.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Lapsa

[Wake1]

...I would add that him refusing to answer my question while wanting me to then answer his doesn't bode well. Not sure if he's Scum or inexperienced.

[curiouskarmadog]

That said, I don't think all fluffiness should be outlawed. Some fluff is alright, so long as it stays within reason.

what is an acceptable fluff to content ratio

on

Day 1

in the first 5 pages ?

which is more damning (in your opinion) in those first 5 pages, posting fluff or confirming but not posting in the game (but posting elsewhere on site)?

[Wake1]

That said, I don't think all fluffiness should be outlawed. Some fluff is alright, so long as it stays within reason.

what is an acceptable fluff to content ratio

on

Day 1

in the first 5 pages ?

which is more damning (in your opinion) in those first 5 pages, posting fluff or confirming but not posting in the game (but posting elsewhere on site)?

The first five or so pages I feel it's ok to post some fluff, but as the game progresses I think it should be kept to a minimum (not saying it shouldn't happen, though).

Hm. If you confirm, but not post in the game you confirmed, but have been posting elsewhere on site... I feel that's a bit more suspicious than fluffing in the first few pages.

[Wake1]

...on a side note, to be safe, I think we should assume we're dealing with a 10:3 Setup.

[Lapsa]

Also, the example of fluff you gave as your reasoning for voting Anen came after your vote, so clearly you saying that wasn't genuine.

but I never said that's my reasoning for voting Anen

[Lapsa]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Luca Blight

[Lapsa]

...I would add that him refusing to answer my question while wanting me to then answer his doesn't bode well. Not sure if he's Scum or inexperienced.

why not both?

In two hours—should nothing change—I'd quite like to discuss Wake88's absence regarding 61.

[Wake1]

Why are you voting Luca, Lapsa?

[Lapsa]

...on a side note, to be safe, I think we should assume we're dealing with a 10:3 Setup.

why?

[Lapsa]

Why are you voting Luca, Lapsa?

define reasoning and I'll answer that