Mini 427 - Clue Mafia 3 - Game Over - Is this what happened?

al_kohaulec · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:30 am

I am Mr. Plum, a watcher, and I targetted Jack last night, and I got that MBL targetted him.

Ectomancer · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:32 am

Wow, simulposts! I was wondering why it was on page 6 when my reply brought me back to the page and there was already a page 7....

Ectomancer · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:35 am

Well. since Jack was the Vig, and he died last night, MBL, what say you about the claim that you targeted someone who kicked the bucket?

Battle Mage · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:38 am

al_kohaulec wrote:I am Mr. Plum, a watcher, and I targetted Jack last night, and I got that MBL targetted him.

that...
actually....
makes SENSE.

Unvote, Vote: MBL

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:54 am

...

What is it with you people and your premature claims? You're going to out power roles with that strategy, over and over again. You may out scum 30% of the time, but you'd probably still be able to get those scum lynched by voting and arguing aggressively, holding your results til needed.

Read the thread and ask yourselves who would have targeted Jack last night.

Yes, I targeted Jack, yes you're probably a watcher. And BM's probably a cop. A retarded one

Ectomancer · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:23 pm

Battle Mage wrote:
al_kohaulec wrote:I am Mr. Plum, a watcher, and I targetted Jack last night, and I got that MBL targetted him.
that...
actually....
makes SENSE.

Unvote, Vote: MBL

Uhhh....what? You got a guilty on a watcher, which he may be.....a scum watcher! Did you or did you not get a guilty? Why in the world would you move your vote based on a claim made by the guy you think is scum? Do you have reason to believe that you are insane? Does anyone know of a watcher role that shows a guilty?

al_kohaulec · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:06 pm

Hmm.. it's possible BM isn't sane. He could be insane or paranoid.

dahen · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:14 pm

Alko wrote: Hmm.. it's possible BM isn't sane. He could be insane or paranoid

Possible? You reeeeally think so? What else could you think? Thinking he is sane only makes sense if you are scum. Thinking he is scum trying to get town to mislynch and then blame it on being paranoid, well, possible, but then you could never trust a cop.

I'm afraid we are helping scum more than town. I'd prefer not to lynch anyone of Alko, MBL, or BM at the moment.

I'll

accuse CES

to see where that takes us. Maybe it'll at least make him post.

al_kohaulec · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:28 pm

That is the other possibility is that BM was lying.

Ectomancer · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:26 pm

Dahen? Dont lynch the claimed cop, I agree, dont lynch MBL, I agree , but dont lynch al_ko? Say what? Lynch instead the guy who hasn't posted in 30+ days? WTF? Dont you think a mod prod would suit the situation better?

FOS Dahen

accuse al_kohaulec

@BM - get your act together. Despite how many times you have been town acting like scum, eventually you will actually

be

scum. Your latest action is looking to me like it very possibly could be this game. We have room for a mistake, so Im voting al_ko, but you better hope your claimed investigation was correct.

Battle Mage · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:49 pm

calm down lol. i dont believe i ever said i was a cop. Im not.
Im a Tracker.
Last night i tracked Al Ko, and i learnt that he targetted Jack. I assumed that he was either scum, or an investigative role. In order to find out which one, i claimed GUILTY INVESTIGATION. This was in the hope that he would claim Miller or something, which would confirm that he was scum. However, he didnt. He not only claimed an investigative role, but his story also matches up with the facts i have.
Its POSSIBLE that he is genius-scum who read my mind/inbox, and guessed my role, but im more inclined to think we have 2 tracker-type roles, instead of tracker and cop.
That being the case, id like to test Alko's claim by lynching MBL today, who notably has refrained from giving an actual claim.
So, MBL is definitely the play today.

BM

Ectomancer · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:53 am

...

unaccuse

dahen · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:33 pm

Ecto wrote: Lynch instead the guy who hasn't posted in 30+ days? WTF? Dont you think a mod prod would suit the situation better?

Do you actually believe that I would like to lynch him at the moment? I am voting him to see what happens. If you prefer a mod prod, then why didn't you request one?

fos Ectomancer

Don't worry, I'll do it:

Mod: Please prod CES

Ectomancer · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Wed Jun 20, 2007 4:34 am

OMGUS fos much?

Ectomancer · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:12 am

*rattles the silverware*

Battle Mage · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:32 pm

cmon guys, lets get this game moving by killing MBL-scum.

al_kohaulec · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:26 am

Accuse: MBL

My results paired with BM's current results and claim make a lot more sense now. Unless if I hear any reason from MBL to believe he's not scum, it seems pretty clear to me that he is.

Ectomancer · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 4:00 am

MBL was the only person you observed targetting Jack al_ko?

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:17 am

I'm a cop with an innocent on Jack.

Battle Mage · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:10 am

2 trackers and a Cop? dont give me that BS...

MrBuddyLee · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:25 am

It's not even close to BS. Your last several posts make no logical sense whatsoever. Jack was a logical scum AND town target for several reasons last night. alko got a correct result, but that doesn't necessarily imply he's town and it definitely doesn't make me scum. If he's a scum tracker, his logical target would be his partner's kill target so he could implicate whoever else visited Jack. If he's town, he's got a watching result on Jack, the person I thought made the most sense to investigate last night due to his strange claim of info just before lynch.

al_kohaulec · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:26 am

The only one I saw, yes.

And I don't believe MBL, so

Vote: MBL

Battle Mage · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:27 am

MrBuddyLee wrote:It's not even close to BS. Your last several posts make no logical sense whatsoever. Jack was a logical scum AND town target for several reasons last night. alko got a correct result, but that doesn't necessarily imply he's town and it definitely doesn't make me scum. If he's a scum tracker, his logical target would be his partner's kill target so he could implicate whoever else visited Jack. If he's town, he's got a watching result on Jack, the person I thought made the most sense to investigate last night due to his strange claim of info just before lynch.

forget about claimed targets for a second. I said that AlKo came up guilty. He claimed TRACKER which didnt explain the result atall. either by some amazing coincidence he is amazingly lucky scum, or he is telling the truth, in which case you were the killer. If there was any doubt before, you claiming ANOTHER investigative role, has erased it.

BM

al_kohaulec · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:15 am

I also want to be clear on this for this particular game, since I'm a little confused on it.

Jack turned up Mr. Green, vig, didn't he claim Mr. Green, FBI Agent or something?

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:56 am

A Tracker, Watcher and a Cop? I don't buy it.

Accuse: MBL