In post 5298, beastcharizard wrote:What do I have to do to get reinoe lynched?
Same thing you had to do before you needlessly claimed before town had good reason too.
In post 5298, beastcharizard wrote:What do I have to do to get reinoe lynched?
In post 5283, Nero Cain wrote:Ren, what do you think of GM *clearly* calling Beast scum and not hammering thus artificially prolonging the game?
In post 5303, beastcharizard wrote:Why did you ask for said extension?
In post 5297, AxleGreaser wrote:If the game is MB then a town cop is threat to both factionswhichwastes the shot they could be eliminating the other faction with by shooting the cop?
In post 5297, AxleGreaser wrote:So the chnaces if the game is SB are pretty high of getting shot eventually. My point was however, it is not a suicide play by beast.
In post 5302, reinoe wrote:In post 5283, Nero Cain wrote:Ren, what do you think of GM *clearly* calling Beast scum and not hammering thus artificially prolonging the game?
The same thing I think after thor spent all that time interrogating Beast, calling his claim shit but saying he would vote me but didn't until beast's awful claim became even worse. The same thing I think about you calling thor scum all the live long day and even advocating his policy lynch but not hammering. It's weird and aggravating but that's all it is, weird and aggravating. Plus she did this in the first game I played on mafia scum when we were in lylo only she did it for nearly 12 days instead of what...24 hrs?
I called for a day extension which also artificially prolonged the game.
In post 5308, Nero Cain wrote:In post 5302, reinoe wrote:In post 5283, Nero Cain wrote:Ren, what do you think of GM *clearly* calling Beast scum and not hammering thus artificially prolonging the game?
The same thing I think after thor spent all that time interrogating Beast, calling his claim shit but saying he would vote me but didn't until beast's awful claim became even worse. The same thing I think about you calling thor scum all the live long day and even advocating his policy lynch but not hammering. It's weird and aggravating but that's all it is, weird and aggravating. Plus she did this in the first game I played on mafia scum when we were in lylo only she did it for nearly 12 days instead of what...24 hrs?
I called for a day extension which also artificially prolonged the game.
So I was "scummy" for this but somehow Thor and GM aren't. I see selective scumhunting.
I also think there's a HUGE difference in what I did and what GM is doing.
Then this happened...""The difference is trying to determine if there's scum motivation or town motivation. The stuff coming from Nero feels townie."
"1)You scum read thor
2)you think thor is PL worthy
3)you think JK is a common scum RB claim.
4)You don't hammer thor? WTF is this?"
"blegh maybe I was just pissed that Nero didn't hammer."
In post 5310, Nero Cain wrote:Were you pissed at the players that unvoted Thor?
In post 5301, beastcharizard wrote:Ok, so what you are saying is you would rather take out the faction that HAS to shoot for the other team rather than the faction with more people?(1)How does that make any sense in your scenario?(3)You are saying you want to take out someone who is trying to help the town by shooting scum.
(2)Also, I have a guilty. There isn't anything more convincing for a lynch in my book.
In post 5314, beastcharizard wrote: And if this isn't multiball?
In post 5314, beastcharizard wrote:
I have never heard of someone lynching the cop to find out if they guilty is true rather than lynching the guilty to see if the cop is true.
In post 5314, beastcharizard wrote:How often do people fake guilties?
In post 5313, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 5301, beastcharizard wrote:Ok, so what you are saying is you would rather take out the faction that HAS to shoot for the other team rather than the faction with more people?(1)How does that make any sense in your scenario?(3)You are saying you want to take out someone who is trying to help the town by shooting scum.
(2)Also, I have a guilty. There isn't anything more convincing for a lynch in my book.
(2)yes from your point of view there is nothing more convincing and i don't expect you to agree to lynch yourself over your claimed red check.
I however have your claimed red check and two very viable explanations for it.(+ some less so) (one them is you are WW)(one is you are town and an even night cop)
(3)nope I couldn't possibly be saying that.
(1)If I thought Beast and Reinoe were exactly equally likely to flip scum, id still lynch the one I thought was from the short stacked (currently prob 3:2) team. I have never played multiball nor read enough mutliball(any?) scum QTs to be sure but I think one team being at 3:1, gives lots of reason for the 1 team to shoot at the 3. because the one team is hooting at them the 3 team also has incentive to end that. From the 3 scum teams point of view yes townies are dangerous as they have votes and are trying to lynch them. The 1 one left in the other team is no effectively a known vig(as he has one nk and is gunning for them)
I prefer that to the situation with 2v2 as I believe it is possible the scum teams may not be quite as likely to shoot at one another in that case.
Also, why is my prime-number cop not part of your explanations? I mean it is my actual role so you should put it in your explanation.
In post 5241, beastcharizard wrote:Now can we PLEASE lynch Reinoe
I am at the point where I would give something up for reinoe to get lynched. The only thing they have really said is that if they are lynched it is going to be a study of what all town takes as a fake claim. The thing is, that Reinoe is doing the opposite and seeing how much bs scum can spew in order to get out of a cop guilty lynch.
I have never heard of someone lynching the cop to find out if they guilty is true rather than lynching the guilty to see if the cop is true. How often do people fake guilties?
In post 5316, AxleGreaser wrote:and finally I really would prefer to lynch another WW over a maf today
In post 5305, Nero Cain wrote:In post 5297, AxleGreaser wrote:If the game is MB then a town cop is threat to both factionswhichwastes the shot they could be eliminating the other faction with by shooting the cop?
(1)bolded #1 if this is MB and Beast is a cop he is only a threat to the mafia faction. How is he a threat to the WWs?
(2)bolded @2 you are arguing that this is MB and that Beast could be scum. You are also arguing that scum would shoot at each other. You are now arguing that a shot on him would be a waste. This is very much a disconnect.
In post 5297, AxleGreaser wrote:So the chnaces if the game is SB are pretty high of getting shot eventually. My point was however, it is not a suicide play by beast.
(3)I think the chances of scum shooting a threat in mb are just the same as in singleball. I think that in MB a scum team would NOT wabt to kill all of the other team 'cause like...then we'd be focused on just that team.
In post 5215, beastcharizard wrote:He said I got guilties on anti-town entities. Mafia or WW or SK or anything like that was not specified. I do know I get a false guilty on Millers though. Doubt that helps.
In post 5306, beastcharizard wrote:Nero the Hero is at it again.
In post 5317, Nero Cain wrote:In post 5316, AxleGreaser wrote:and finally I really would prefer to lynch another WW over a maf today
why?
In post 5323, Izariael wrote:So... here's a thought I've been chewing on. What if we lynchedneither beast nor reinoe? I'm beginning to think that scum benefits more from this lynch pool than town does. There's no way they are aligned together, which means that one or both of them is scum, so leaving them both alive today keeps more possibility of cross-kills tonight, which is really something that town needs right now. I think we've reached a critical point of the game where scum (certainly the wolves after losing a member) are going to need to target each other tonight.
VOTE: Slandaar
Here's my suggestion for an alternative.