In post 5043, Thor665 wrote:
That said - I think Slandaar looks pretty townish and is approaching the situation fairly.
Obviously you and I disagree here. Slandaar has been chainsaw defending Beast's claim and even inferring arguments that beast made that beast has never actually made.
In post 5043, Thor665 wrote:
Your secondary in time claim would be silly to take at face value - the only way it even makes sense is if there is a rolecop in Beast's faction, and, frankly, a lynch of you could work for me just to help learn that.
Yay for beast's fake claim then. While I don't deny that I'm in the unenviable situation of being on the receiving end of a literal "fake guilty" (because Beast refuses to even elaborate on how his cop result works), given the amount questionable behavior surrounding his claim I think it's crap that there are indeed a number of people taking his claim at face value. Like I said, if town mislynches me today then it'll be a case study on what types of behavior town will tolerate when there's a claim. Can I get a link to the time AP faked a guilty on you? Because I'm kinda surprised that given the amount of diceyness surrounding Beast's claim and the fact that you've been on the receiving end of a fake guilty, you're willing to accept this.
On a second note, I hate "information lynches" even more than quicklynches and compromise lynches. I've never seen "information lynch" give information that shouldn't readily be available. For example...we need to know if there's a rolecop. I just said there has to be one. Now of course you can assume I'm lying but you can more justifiably assume that it's the truth because holy crap Beast's play has been legit scummy.
In post 5043, Thor665 wrote:
You being town gives us confirmed BP town in Boonderp though - which is at least amusing as scum lose that easy as pie mislynch.
Boons is not an easy pie lynch, which was a contributing factor to why I investigated him. If he's scum, his play gets townread.