In post 4623, Thor665 wrote:it was a really gakked up progression and makes no sense.
and I agree I saw gakked up stuff.
In post 4623, Thor665 wrote:it was a really gakked up progression and makes no sense.
In post 4625, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 4623, Thor665 wrote:it was a really gakked up progression and makes no sense.
and I agree I saw gakked up stuff.
In post 4629, Shiro wrote:Oh btw another coincidence he talked to say he will contribute when he reached 3 votes and I was trying to convince people to vote him and when wagon went nowhere and tier left it he pops to say "oh by tommorow I meant next day phase cause I thought Thor was hammered"
That is suspicious .
In post 4632, Shiro wrote:Iz why ? How was his push on Thor then vote on GM and the back to Thor cause test town like ?
^Gm same question cause u said u aren't voting him.
Axl I get what u are sayingbut we are going thereanyway cause people here cant agree.
In post 4624, AxleGreaser wrote:Right now you are interpreting those events as scummy
In post 4617, reinoe wrote:7)Basically it looks like you didn't hammer thorbecause you wanted to "look townie"even though you had multiple completely justified reason to do so. I admit I definitely wanted thor hammered and lynched because I think he's scum. The question is why DIDN'T you want thor hammered?
Not very long ago you said
In post 4377, reinoe wrote:If Nero was serious about "lulz policy lynch thor" then he could have...
1)declared thor's claim fake and hammered.
2)FAKE cc'ed
3)pretended he wasn't paying attention to the VC and derphammered
Like sometimes townies do things that don't fucking make sense. Boons in every game. Some of the stuff coming from Dave and Flubber. The difference is trying to determine if there's scum motivation or town motivation.The stuff coming from Nero feels townie.Compare that to all the discrediting coming from thor earlier this DP. That shit was not town.
I would be be a lot happier if it was easier or even possible to make those two posts line up and agree with one another.
In post 4634, reinoe wrote:
Spoiler: stuff i said
Wow, it's almost as if a shift in the game state caused a shift in opinion. Remarkable huh? Strange how something like that happened. It's like Nero Cain did something that did not have a townie feel to it at all and I made a 7 point post explaining it...
In post 4617, reinoe wrote:In post 4616, Nero Cain wrote:In post 4596, reinoe wrote:Nero, did you believe Thor's claim?
I neither believe nor disbelieve his claim. (its null and wifom.) I know that JK is a common scum rb claim. So what specifically makes you disbelieve his claim?
I most certainly don't believe his claim. As you've already mentioned JK is a common scum RB claim. Here's where all of a sudden I'm finding you dicey...
1)You scum read thor
2)you think thor is PL worthy
3)you think JK is a common scum RB claim.
4)You don't hammer thor? WTF is this?
5)If thor is telling the truth then he's now nothing more than a named townie. Is it worth running up someone else who may be a PR?
6)thor would have been a HUGE information lynch. Look at how divisive everything around him is/was. From the way the wagon formed to how he was defended. Huge amounts of information that we could have looked over. There were counter-wagons and everything.
7)Basically it looks like you didn't hammer thor because you wanted to "look townie" even though you had multiple completely justified reason to do so. I admit I definitely wanted thor hammered and lynched because I think he's scum. The question is why DIDN'T you want thor hammered?
In post 4639, TierShift wrote:y not nero?
In post 4622, reinoe wrote:In post 4621, Nero Cain wrote:In post 4620, Thor665 wrote:2. I do not see what players hopping off of my wagon due to a claim has to do with rolefishing.
anyone else that gets wagoned and is looking at the lynch is being forced to claim. Its the same the Ren is arguing but he's accusing me of running others up when I didn't.
misrep.
In post 4617, reinoe wrote:Is it worth running up someone else who may be a PR?
In post 4625, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 4623, Thor665 wrote:it was a really gakked up progression and makes no sense.
and I agree I saw gakked up stuff.
In post 4646, Nero Cain wrote:I know or think I know what he's saying but is still fucking stupid.
In post 4647, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 4646, Nero Cain wrote:I know or think I know what he's saying but is still fucking stupid.
You think you know what reinoe is saying?
Wanna guess and share?
In post 4632, Shiro wrote:Iz why ? How was his push on Thor then vote on GM and the back to Thor cause test town like ?
In post 3999, davesaz wrote:In post 3984, Thor665 wrote:In post 3983, davesaz wrote:Can you refresh the case against GM? I want to see what you point out and compare that to other material where alignment is known.
For me,I just find the slot uselessand a better lynch than me due to useless.
That's also my case on Beast.
Really? And you expect anyone to vote that?
Tell me again, what are your contributions other than yelling very loudly?
I mean, is it really that much of a distinction that people listen? Last I heard by way of vote count, fewer were listening to you than GM.
In post 4005, Thor665 wrote:In post 3999, davesaz wrote:Really? And you expect anyone to vote that?
Tell me again, what are your contributions other than yelling very loudly?
I mean, is it really that much of a distinction that people listen? Last I heard by way of vote count, fewer were listening to you than GM.
My contributions are not sitting around doing nothing and acting like it means something.
*snippage*
((To Scripten))Why not vote GM now and make the game more exciting?
In post 4006, davesaz wrote:<Dave thinks some in the shower>
CLICK!
VOTE: goodmorning
Reason: Gamestate ephiphany
Thor, how certain are you that GM is the right player to wagon at this time?Just a sniff, rock solid, somewhere in between?