Well, well, well.
Isn't it interesting how easily double standards can be set up?
Whenever someone puts a weak case, noone bats an eye.
Whenever someone votes without explaining it (especially if the vote is for me), noone bats an eye.
Whenever I post a case, everybody loses their minds.
For your information, about Slandaar. (Supplementary for
1969.)
– the highlighted bits were scummy because, (1) "let's lynch someone else is way not enough for launching a case; and there are other possibilities besides Thor and PereV; (2) that part about "Goodmorning is scum because she doesn't make mistakes as scum" must have been a joke, but a real life experience from me is that players tend to make joke out of real things just to attenuate their "annoying" thoughts; I still can't see why a player who has never played with Csareo before is scummier because of their interaction with him than another one who has played with Csareo. (And this argument against TSO from me was called weak... yet another double standard)
– I was FoS-ed in another game for using the phrase "derail a wagon" and I was town
– I must add this: in
1979 Slandaar gave his own words into my mouth
– and the most important part, which, I must admit, an intuition-read, was his nervous reaction to my scumlist. Some calls things like that "reaction tests". But, I've already learnt it: if someone else performs a reaction test, noone bats an eye. If I do the same...
Then, like wow!
Two votes arrived in 7 minutes. Muffin was "not confident enough" about his reads, TierShift said "remove that noisy spammer who
might
flip scum. (
1988/
1989) Yeah, those are
very strong
reads indeed, aren't they?
Garmr sheeped the wagon and I'm not surprised at all.
Remember what I said before?
My posts are misinterpreted, misrepresented or ignored, and used by many for playing the "Regardless Of Card" at me and many are talking AT me instead of talking TO me. It still works in this way: some players ARE interested in focusing on me and make out arguments out of anything to call me scum. I have a couple of ideas, but if you check the thread, there WILL be one name which crystallizes itself out VERY clearly. Who's ALWAYS there whenever there IS a possibility of a wagon against me. (No, I won't tell it. If I told, there would be more votes without cases for me.)
Feel free to lynch me, but and as soon as I flip town start examining all the votes for me and all the players who were eagerly voting for me without providing any reasons. I strongly think THAT would be more helpful to the town than my posts.