In post 1023, Xayzeck wrote:I bring up meta (suggests he is scum)
He denies it (also suggests he is scum)
"yes im definitely acting very scummy"
that would be more town?
In post 1023, Xayzeck wrote:I bring up meta (suggests he is scum)
He denies it (also suggests he is scum)
In post 1028, ProHawk wrote:Meta has no credibility.
In post 1023, Xayzeck wrote:I bring up meta (suggests he is scum)
He denies it (also suggests he is scum)
Read flip on rosey, suggests 1v1 for no reason, doesn't let go
General half-assed posting, fluff, brings up games between him and I(this particular point doesn't suggest alignment, because I can't attach an alignment to it, but it's disturbing)
^that's your summary
In post 1033, ProHawk wrote:I appealed to Xay to present an option between Adrien/Droog. That never happened which makes me believe he doesn't want to tip the scales one way or another because his lynch is coming down the pike soon. I don't see anything happening from now to deadline, so I am just going to vote.
In post 1031, OkaPoka wrote:1. So give me your best meta case with examples
2. Good reasons and good reasons
3. That's me
In post 1033, ProHawk wrote:I appealed to Xay to present an option between Adrien/Droog.
In post 1032, TheAdrienC wrote:I'm still deadset Droog is one.
In post 1026, ProHawk wrote:At this point, you might convince me to vote out of Droog and Adrien. So maybe try that?
In post 1037, Xayzeck wrote:In post 1032, TheAdrienC wrote:I'm still deadset Droog is one.
Why aren't you voting droog?
Why isn't droog voting you?
You've voted each other, nobody has quickhammered. 1 scum is between you and droog, right? I think this is established already.
So why aren't you two crossing?
In post 1034, Xayzeck wrote:though I am leaning toward droog given how his case isn't mega convincing
In post 1039, droog wrote:hm?
i was and then i realized that prohawk not double hammering did not celar him
because there is no double hammering
so i got paranoid because i didnt have the scumteam like i thought
and then i got sucked into work for a week
In post 716, droog wrote:@714:
third question first (the crux of my case)
i told him that noticing daytalk was more likely if he was scum
he then went on about how it was pro-town
all scum would notice no daytalk
not every townie would
this is always true and instead of agreeing he argued against something i never said
In post 1038, ProHawk wrote:In post 1026, ProHawk wrote:At this point, you might convince me to vote out of Droog and Adrien. So maybe try that?
UNVOTE: Xayzeck
In post 716, droog wrote:@714:
third question first (the crux of my case)
i told him that noticing daytalk was more likely if he was scum
he then went on about how it was pro-town
all scum would notice no daytalk
not every townie would
this is always true and instead of agreeing he argued against something i never said
In post 1042, Xayzeck wrote:In post 1039, droog wrote:hm?
i was and then i realized that prohawk not double hammering did not celar him
because there is no double hammering
so i got paranoid because i didnt have the scumteam like i thought
and then i got sucked into work for a week
Point being, you voted adrien, and nobody quickhammered.
This should confirm adrien as scum, yes?
In post 1043, Xayzeck wrote:@Hawk: I lean droog mainly for his case on adrien. I'm not saying it's a bad case and that it has invalid points, I will say it is a weak case, and not enough to warrant a vote in lylo. That's why I think droog could be scum. I picked up on his case, and it took him a while to respond to it. I've noticed that I haven't replied though, so I'll have to continue with this before I can solidly tell you I prefer droog. I'm assuming you've seen his case, and my response, if not I can link them for you, but basically it outlines the problems I have with his adrien scumread, how it's a fairly weak read, and the fact he was quick to throw out a vote bothers me.
In post 716, droog wrote:@714:
third question first (the crux of my case)
i told him that noticing daytalk was more likely if he was scum
he then went on about how it was pro-town
all scum would notice no daytalk
not every townie would
this is always true and instead of agreeing he argued against something i never said
You told him noticing daytalk was more likely if he was scum, that is correct. He goes on to talk about how it's protown. Ok, cool. All scum would notice, not all town would, correct. With all of this, you are implying that noticing daytalk is scum indicative, since scum are more likely to have done so. Unless you said that it's more likely that scum brought it up, but that it isn't indicative of scum? Because that makes absolutely no sense.
Therefore he is arguing that revealing daytalk is town indicative, in order to defend himself. This is the bulk of your case, could you maybe back this up more? Because I don't see what exactly why saying "noticing the daytalk is protown" indicates so strongly he is scum.
What about ignoring your Oka-question strongly indicates scum? I believe the biggest issue you have with this is that he defends himself be saying Oka is not his top scumread. I'd encourage you to go back and look at the question you asked him "share your read on Oka and dazzle me with a vote on your top scumread" (something like that) and tell me that there's no way, absolutely 100% no way, that he could have interpreted that as "tell me your read on Oka and dazzle me with a vote on your top scumread(which would refer to Oka)". This is in no means scum, and it's not a particularly strong point to have in your case.
In post 1043, Xayzeck wrote:You told him noticing daytalk was more likely if he was scum, that is correct. He goes on to talk about how it's protown.Ok, cool. All scum would notice, not all town would, correct. With all of this, you are implying that noticing daytalk is scum indicative, since scum are more likely to have done so. Unless you said that it's more likely that scum brought it up, but that it isn't indicative of scum? Because that makes absolutely no sense.
Therefore he is arguing that revealing daytalk is town indicative, in order to defend himself. This is the bulk of your case, could you maybe back this up more? Because I don't see what exactly why saying "noticing the daytalk is protown" indicates so strongly he is scum.
In post 515, TheAdrienC wrote:That right there was you calling me scum over it. Don't backtrack.