You are right, I didn't, I don't see the point in picking on of a rigged system.xyzzy wrote:You didn't choose one.
Fair enough. I think hearing people talk about who they replaced is interesting.Qman wrote:1.) What play? Thats not even meant to be sarcastic. A random vote and two oops posts? I didn't even notice the questions when you first posted it. Theres your answer.
His investigations? It would be helpful if you figured out who you wanted lynched, as we will LOSE the game if people act like this.2.) It's a cop out, and I know it, but I don't know who we should lynch today. Ergo, I'm not voting. I will say I'm not comfortable being the hammer on xyzzy, which is why i haven't voted. If *I* had to pick I'd pick Bluezebra, because his investigations while possible, are a little fishy as they duplicate WhoMe?'s
You think that Blue Zebra claimed cop? That's awesome. So, you are completely skimming and misunderstood what JDodge attacked him for, right? Thinking we have two cops is even more ridiculous than a doc and a sort of doc. I also find it interesting that you have "zero problem" believing he is naive. It's something to consider, but you should have a little bit of a problem with it.3.) I'm pretty confident in WhoMes claim, and xyzzy fits what I'd picture the role name as in this setting. Blue Zebra, eehh.. I'm really unsure of his because all he did was state he investigated the exact same people after whome posted his. I'm not saying it couldn't legitimately happen... but it's at the least, noteable as an oddity.
4&5.) I'm pretty sure we don't have two cops, unless one is naive/paranoid. And neither seems to be paranoid as no one has been posted as coming up scum. Though I have zero problem believing that god is a naive cop. The problem here is that both say the came up with the same results on the same people. I'm leaning towards only 1 Cop role. I know it looks like I'm waffling here, but i doubt I can avoid it. I'm unsure, and don't want to come down to hard on one side of this only to regret it later, as mistakes can haunt you in this game. For now, I'd buy one Legit Cop, with a nod to the possibility that God would be a naive cop. Jesus told his father God, "Forgive them father, for they know not what they do" If god is the forgiving figure that is generally believed in by Christians, he'd forgive any transgression, and only see the good in people.
That is not compelling. See, if I were asked the same question, I would say because I am trying very hard to help the town win. I might be off (like it appears I was with JDodge and WhoMe), but I am putting a lot of effort into it. Can you say the same? And if not, why shouldn't we lynch you? If you are town, don't you want to win?6.) Because I'm not scum. I know, classic scum tell, but it's the truth. I doubt you'd be happy with the results.
I will try to ask as many as I can think of. Feel free to respond to anything without being asked, though.Keep asking questions please, I really enjoy the process of answering them
No, power roles should try to find scum. The doc and the cop are very helpful to getting a win for the town, but they aren't completely necessary.xyzzy wrote:Many roles have good reason to mostly lurk; power roles need to avoid being the targets of lynches.
Oh, and I'm not the one who roleclaimed God.
It's called a false dilemna, and it's a logic trap where there is no good answer. The fact that he is harping on it like it means you are scum (but not even worth a worthless FOS) is nuts.Qman wrote:You are right, I didn't, I don't see the point in picking on of a rigged system.xyzzy wrote:You didn't choose one.
If I say:
Power Role = *waves a kill me scum flag*
Scum = *waves a lynch me flag*
Townie = Pointless, because both a power role and a scum would say they were just a townie.
Really it's a no win situation. I choose not to respond to it with a hollow reply.
Fair Enough. I'll start putting more time into my thoughts on this as of... Now!Spambot wrote: His investigations? It would be helpful if you figured out who you wanted lynched, as we will LOSE the game if people act like this.
Yup. I was being a moron. I posted a follow up already after i recognized my stupid moment. I very well could be misunderstanding things, and I will reread in order to make sure what I'm thinking is based on facts, not my dyslexic self making me show my ass.You think that Blue Zebra claimed cop? That's awesome. So, you are completely skimming and misunderstood what JDodge attacked him for, right? Thinking we have two cops is even more ridiculous than a doc and a sort of doc. I also find it interesting that you have "zero problem" believing he is naive. It's something to consider, but you should have a little bit of a problem with it.
Oh I want the town to win, but my personal viewpoint is I'd rather not point fingers until I have a solid feel for the situation, as I came into the game late, I don't. I *never* feel as comfortable having to catch up versus playing start to finish. I takes the real time aspect of watching the arguments flow away, instead i get to read it in one large sum, and absorbing subtle details is a lot harder as a sub.That is not compelling. See, if I were asked the same question, I would say because I am trying very hard to help the town win. I might be off (like it appears I was with JDodge and WhoMe), but I am putting a lot of effort into it. Can you say the same? And if not, why shouldn't we lynch you? If you are town, don't you want to win?
I'm trying to see how he'll answer it.Spambot wrote:It's called a false dilemna, and it's a logic trap where there is no good answer. The fact that he is harping on it like it means you are scum (but not even worth a worthless FOS) is nuts.Qman wrote:You are right, I didn't, I don't see the point in picking on of a rigged system.xyzzy wrote:You didn't choose one.
If I say:
Power Role = *waves a kill me scum flag*
Scum = *waves a lynch me flag*
Townie = Pointless, because both a power role and a scum would say they were just a townie.
Really it's a no win situation. I choose not to respond to it with a hollow reply.
I'm still relatively neutral on Qman; it's possible he's totally unaware of how I play and thinks I'm just an idiot.[/quote]xyzzy wrote:I'm trying to see how he'll answer it.Spambot wrote:It's called a false dilemna, and it's a logic trap where there is no good answer. The fact that he is harping on it like it means you are scum (but not even worth a worthless FOS) is nuts.Qman wrote:You are right, I didn't, I don't see the point in picking on of a rigged system.xyzzy wrote:You didn't choose one.
If I say:
Power Role = *waves a kill me scum flag*
Scum = *waves a lynch me flag*
Townie = Pointless, because both a power role and a scum would say they were just a townie.
Really it's a no win situation. I choose not to respond to it with a hollow reply.
It's just my playstyle; I look for the slightest inconsistency, and push that one until I'm satisfied that they're telling the truth.
But Qman was totally unwilling to say anything; perhaps he's caught on to how my method works and now he's carefully making my questioning look like scum trying to get a townie lynched.
Hey now, stay out of my idiot room, it's mine.I'm still relatively neutral on Qman; it's possible he's totally unaware of how I play and thinks I'm just an idiot.
Doubting Thomas? What kind of a messed up role name is that? Paraphrase some of the flavor you got or something, because that name is trippy.Qman wrote:Alive list:
Now A Ranger
Jdodge
Remussaidow
Qman
Spambot
Whome?
Clear list:
WhoMe?
Spambot
Jdodge
Possible scum:
Now A Ranger
Remussaidow
Qman
I'm claiming as a townie, by the name of Doubting Thomas.
That leaves Remuss and NAR.
Spambot: Why wasn't NAR in your "possible lynch list"?
