In post 278, Wake1 wrote:Good evening TierShift.
...
I'd like to talk with you, please. I need to get a better footing on your alignment this game. Your cooperation would be valued.
Please note this, everyone.
I'm noting my cooperation would be valued.
Your vote on Mr. Ree in (
6) makes me wonder why it was cast. It looks like an OMGUS, which is inherently anti-Town, or so the majority says. It didn't escape me how you voted for Ree in (
6), and then asked BBT in (
9) if he thought Ree's vote was random. If you don't think Ree's vote was random, then you should be able to explain why you thought otherwise. Though your questions in (
9) pangs of Townish curiosity, your (
6) leaves me without complete understanding.
all right, an ongoing game prompted me to believe mr_ree's vote wasn't random. I can't explain further. However, seeing as BBT probably did not know about the rationale for me not believing it was random, I wondered why
he
thought it wasn't random.
(
13) is difficult to weigh. Questions are good for illumination and discussion. You may not feel his questions needed to be answered, but the content derived from the discussion revolving said questions can prove fruitful. In fact part of our discussion involves them even now.
the questions were utterly useless and I felt that throwing out a snarky remark about that would be better for discussion purposes than staying silent or answering the questions. I was proven right.
(
15) and (
16) leave me wondering why you made them. There should have been a reason, yet I'm not seeing it. Your explanation would be appreciated.
scripten was being lame and BBT's
14 was lame too.
Your (
18) rings Townish, yet it's generic and safe, in my humble opinion. It does not look like Ree was the best wagon, per your (
21). I would like some answers from you on this.
I don't know what you want me to say here. I was mostly thinking scripten's questions were going nowhere. So I called for a ree wagon.
The grammatical errors in (
24) probably mean nothing. It also doesn't seem you are using the function which stops and allows you to preview/edit your post when someone's posted before you've finished typing. That, too, likely means nothing, although knowing these subtleties isn't inherently detrimental. Scum doesn't have Daystart, so in (
24) it can't be said that you and BBT were Scum partners who spoke privately before the Day started, which could have explained you two thinking the same thing around the same time. I'm not certain what to think of (
24). Same with (
25).
Since I'm not a native speaker, I'd like you to tell me which grammatical mistakes I made. This paragraph seems of little relevance, though.
Content is and continues to be generated because those questions were put forth and discussed (
30). Again it pangs Townish when you ask BBT for the scum motivation in pushing that issue. You can never tell, apropos (
32). He could be an alt. (
34) and (
40) begets indifference. For the third time, TierShift says something that reads Townish in (
42). At this point I am Townreading him a little.
TierShift, maybe you should not have acted so hastily when you cast your vote for Vettrock in (
46) for, as you call it, unnecessary prolongation of RVS. Him posting a supposedly RVS vote in (
38) isn't grounds for a serious vote, especially when I've played in games when the person's first post, a random vote, was after the #100 mark. Let's discuss this further, because this latest action is stirring up doubt in your alignment.
I saw the first thing I considered scummy, so I voted it. Trying to return to RVS is scummy, whether you like it or not. Not very, but enough to cast a vote. Also done with faint hopes vettrock would find it interesting enough to talk about.
Please share what (
53) is regarding. An elaboration on (
55) would help, because it can be difficult understanding what you're meaning at times. I mean no disrespect by that.
Can you stop being overly polite, please?
53 was a question aimed at vettrock, 55 regarded scripten thinking me and bbt were buddies for something he didn't find too strong a tell himself.
I notice in (
65) that you didn't vote Josh_B near the timeframe when he voted for Vettrock and then for Scripten. Josh's (
61) was obviously a random vote, yet your accusation of him prolonging RVS unnecessarily doesn't materialize. At that point your vote is still on Vettrock, and you do indeed have time to change it from him to Josh, since by your logic when it comes to the unnecessary prolongation of RVS, #61 must be a worse offense than #38.
Josh wasn't prolonging RVS since he read the game and voted seriously immediately after. He actually contrivuted while vettrock failed to do so.
If you would, I'd like to know what your view is on Scumtells, per your (
78). In your words overreaction and counterpushing aren't Scumtells. I wonder if you think hypocrisy is.
It all depends on context. There are very, very few scumtells that can be applied at any time. Hypocrisy can be a playstyle thing and isn't necessarily scummy. Same goes for the other two, although a bit less. However, if you're using these to further your own cause and not as genuine paranoia, I take it as a scumtell.
I need to rest. Will be back tomorrow to rejoin you on this. Goodnight everyone.
sure, come again. What's with this focus on me, anyway?
