I don't like this post. He's stating the obvious and seems overly self-aware of having a random vote.Kabenon007 wrote:Alright, there seems to be enough suspicion floating around now that a random vote seems unnecessary, so unvote.
I don't like how aggressively ~N9V~ is pushing for a quick lynch. At this point, a quick lynch is probably not necessary. The longer we draw out a lynch of somebody who has acted pretty scummy, (looking at you, xyzzy,) then maybe there will be the possibility that in the ensuing bouts of defense and accuse, another scum will get too eager to defend, or too eager to put down the hammer in an effort to appear town, thereby landing another scummy person to accuse. So, my thoughts are to wait on a lynch, but keep pressure where pressure is needed to bring out conversation and hopefully scum.
This is pretty scummy too. He is saying that he finds xyzzy suspicious, but he doesn't really need to vote for him? I wish he hadn't been replaced so he could answer. The next best thing, Remus, what do you think Kabenon007 was trying to say? As a matter of fact, if you'd like to go over a bunch of his posts and tell us what you think of them, that would be awesome.Kabenon007 wrote:Firstly, I am a kabenon, not James Bond, there is a major difference. And to answer your question, I don't believe that putting him a -2 is anymore effective than leaving him at -3. Xyzzy knows he is in deep trouble, and needs to defend himself, and at least has the right to defend himself before he incurs the wrath of the kabenon! I just don't feel that I need to place my vote on him to put pressure on him.
Huh, you know what? I'm rereading, and Albert didn't attack xyzzy as much as I had thought. I mean, he jumped on it near the beginning (but not the first) and then he moved on to N9V pretty quick. Also, xyzzy's responses are as awful as I thought at the time. One of the reasons I dropped it is because I have a tendency to get tunnel vision on a particular player, and I didn't want to be so focused on xyzzy that I missed something else (like how scummy JDodge was acting).
Apologizes for not contributing. He states two times that he will get to more analysis later, but it never comes.ShadyForce wrote:Sorry, I'm very busy and this game has taken off like a rocket. Never seen to much information to work off in the first 24 hours of a game. I'll get to some proper analysis when I get a chance.
But no, my vote was not random. I reiterate, I haven't had a chance to read and analyse the whole thread, but my gut says that Xyzzy is pro-town and I'm convinced that probably 2 of the first 3/4 people on that bandwagon are information-hunting anti-town players of some desctiption.
More later.
@Qman: Same thing I said to Remus