?? DGB is scum or aounterwagon?Shanba wrote:I'd guess that mneme and DGB were the scum and that Mr. Flay and DGB are the counterwagons.
I don't care about MoS hounding you and Raffles anymore, that's so yesterday. I have observed other behaviors that were more clearly scummy, such as the Flay "drop the bomb and run" and MoS's defense of Flay. If I create opportunities for people to jump onto me, so be it; most people by now are aware this is my playstyle, and besides, I never make it far into any game. If I manage to avoid being lynched, you can be sure the scum won't tolerate me for one more day. As for OTU, who cares, it was a Day 1 wagon, the day needed moving on, and I was too busy with other RL matters to really get involved with the game. You're concerned with my roleclaim? Urgh? Where did I roleclaim? I don't remember roleclaiming. If you want to know why I voted all these people, read the game. Mostly for smallish scumtells. I do remember this made MoS really really nervous; and he's defended Flay. As to why I think Flay is the most scummy, I've already answered that.XReyoX wrote:@DGB: Please provide evidence showing MoS was houding me and raffles. It is good to shake things up to increase the pace of the game, but votes and reasons without any support are not tolerated. If you are town, your attempts at catching scums are almost useless and are also creating opportunity for people to hop onto you.. I believe any scums with half their brain frozen would notice you are voting people around you without any good reasons. I do not appreciate the fact that you said you've forgotten your reasons for voting OTU yesterday. I'm concerned about your roleclaim as well. Please explain the reason for it. Up till now, you have voted Flay, kison, mneme, MoS and PbuG. Could you compare ALL of the candidates you've voted before and state the reason why flay is most likely scum to you.
Flay is around. He has been prodded, and has picked up his prod. He os around to defend himself.XReyoX wrote:@BM: If you do not approve of flay's wagon because he is not around to defend himself, then why were you on OTU's wagon when he was inactive?
. I believe I have been fairly explicit in why I believe mneme is scum. For more info see my posts 2, 10, 13, 14 and 15.
Any player of any alignment could attempt to sidetrack a wagon on any player of any alignment. A scum is not required to have a wagon sidetracked. All that is required is that a wagon exists and someone is trying to break it, and that is what DGB appeared to be aiming for earlier.XReyoX wrote:To accuse DBG of sidetracking, the first requirement is "raffles is scum".
Maybe I was yesterday, but I can't see how you came to thinking that MoS was hounding me. Mind quoting his posts which show that?DrippingGoofball wrote:I don't care about MoS hounding you and Raffles anymore, that's so yesterday.
Clearly not helping are you? Killing yourself even if you are a town in any games.DrippingGoofball wrote:most people by now are aware this is my playstyle, and besides, I never make it far into any game.
Poor attitude towards the game? You were busy yet you wanted the day to move on? Surely you should have hoped that the day would slow day so you could catch up. So, is your vote on flay another "who cares, i want the day to move on"again?DrippingGoofball wrote:As for OTU, who cares, it was a Day 1 wagon, the day needed moving on, and I was too busy with other RL matters to really get involved with the game.
Here :arrow:DrippingGoofball wrote: I don't remember roleclaiming.
What good does it do to the town by announcing you have a passive skill?DrippingGoofball wrote: No, I don't have a power role. I have a role, but it's really minor, and it's highly unlikely to make a difference in the game. It's a passive, rather than active, ability.
You might have given reasons, but you weren't comparing between your new target with the other ones you were voting. You didn't give reasons for your unvotes.DrippingGoofball wrote:If you want to know why I voted all these people, read the game. Mostly for smallish scumtells. I do remember this made MoS really really nervous; and he's defended Flay. As to why I think Flay is the most scummy, I've already answered that.
If I were to accuse someone of tactical lurking, bird would be my first choice.Phoebus wrote:bird1111 has indicated that replacement in this game shall not be necessary.
Well, because we are deadlined while, more importantly, instead of trying to look into other possibilities first and then do something about it, she was trying to break the wagon on the player who most people figured was most likely to be scum this time around without any other alternative offered.XReyoX wrote:Why is DGB trying to break a wagon appear scummy?Kison wrote:All that is required is that a wagon exists and someone is trying to break it, and that is what DGB appeared to be aiming for earlier.
DrippingGoofball wrote:Wait a minute, you little fiend.
First off, your vote isn't on PBuG, it's on me. Link for the skeptics
"The case on PBug/Flay scumbuddies is strong" - you wrote. I beg to differ. PBuG may be scum, but he's not scum with Flay, c'mon. You go figure it out. I am too exasperated with you to explain it again.
You don't even know who you're voting for. You don't know whether you're afoot on on horseback.
You accuse PBuG and Flay of being scumbuddies, yet you vote for a third party, then you insist you are voting for PBUG???
Hang on.. youBattle Mage wrote:i didnt vote for OTU yesterday because he was inactive-i strongly felt him to be scum. i didnt feel quite as strongly about Flay.
Battle Mage wrote:OTU seems very scummy at the moment-perhaps even more so than Kison. Of the two bandwagons, i think i know where im at.
Unvote, Vote: Overtheunder
I might have missed your answer. Could you please quote it for me please. ThxBattle Mage wrote:i believe i have already answered that scernario.
^This about sums it up. if you want me to reread the specific instance, so i have a better answer, please direct me to it, and i will do so.Battle Mage wrote:@xreyox-i dont recall the occassion you are talking about, but i assume my vote change would have been based on a strong case against him.
