In post 496, Octopus wrote:and it assists Tattletale in the construction of her fake claim
My fake claim is Vanilla Townie.
In post 496, Octopus wrote:and it assists Tattletale in the construction of her fake claim
In post 481, Octopus wrote:And that worked out well for town, didn't it? Also there is a lot of dodgy logic on display in Grib's posts, including, not unlike yours, the idea that disagreeing with something makes you scum.
Is that really the best you can come up with?
Can everyone answer this question please.
How many scum do you think there are in this game?
It's important. If the general consensus is that there are three then we lynch Tattletale today, if not then we can lynch her tomorow, and see if we can find her scumbuddy today.
In post 479, Boonskiies wrote:Octopus is my #1 scum read. I had him pretty much set as town, as he was obviously 'scum hunting', but once he got here, he immediately targeted the two easiest people to try and get a bandwagon on. And Grib was obv town....it would be way unbalanced to give scum a double vote, and the fact that he didn't even take major abuse to the role, like putting both votes on one person, should show he was obvtown. Octopus is convinced he was not obvtown. Grib was very hesitant about the double lynch happening, way too much if he was scum.
In post 491, Boonskiies wrote:I don't see any reason for him to false claim. What does everyone else think? Saving himself for one more turn or legit? I mean, he could have easily just went for a lynch at me, and saved himself. He's a sure NK now.
In post 493, Boonskiies wrote:I didn't say I turned. My vote is still on him. I'm just posting observations. He has to prove he's not just false claiming.
In post 496, Octopus wrote:@Drew-Sta. Not really, it gives scum clue as to optimal strategy for the night, and it assists Tattletale in the construction of her fake claim. You do realise that you should be pushing TT for a claim after an allegation like that don't you?
In post 514, bjc wrote:I think you might be scum with Octopus but that's not worth discussing right now.
In post 503, theelkspeaks wrote:Boonskiies lack of effort defending himself is pretty sad. In either case, we need to lynch either the claimed JOAT or the claimed guilty, no point in lynching anyone else.
I'm inclined to lynch Tattle more, I think. Tattle and Octo, tell us why we should lynch the other instead of you.
In post 509, bjc wrote:Lynch the claimed JOAT, that's a super shitty fake claim and he's obviously scum from my POV based on his posts/wording/tone.
vote: Octopus
for being scum. Tattletale already pointed it out, but when you get a guilty...
In post 513, Boonskiies wrote:Or option #4, where just Octopus is mafia. UNLESS they're both mafia.
In post 514, bjc wrote:I think you might be scum with Octopus but that's not worth discussing right now.
In post 514, bjc wrote:Octopus claimed scum with that super shitty fake claim/guilty. We're in LyLo what a 'perfect' way to try and push for the win with an apathetic town.
-IT IS EVEN RARER (read: nonexistent) for town to withhold a guilty in our current situation, then come out and say "well fuck it I got a guilty on someone that has been scummy all game."
In post 514, bjc wrote:Boon don't be a fool, you may actually be town. Please if you *are* town do not listen to those shitty theories.
In post 517, bjc wrote:In post 503, theelkspeaks wrote:Boonskiies lack of effort defending himself is pretty sad. In either case, we need to lynch either the claimed JOAT or the claimed guilty, no point in lynching anyone else.
I'm inclined to lynch Tattle more, I think. Tattle and Octo, tell us why we should lynch the other instead of you.
hmmm....