In post 1051, AngryIcerink wrote:@ Nero -- FWIW, the shos from the previous several pages is 0% similar to the scum shos I played with previously. The lurky shos before that was similar to the earlier shos, though.
- Iec
So Shos, you keep saying that you aren't lurky as scum and that its an insult yet Ice is saying that he's played with lurky scum Shos so why are you ignoring this?
Beast claiming was head desk.
I still don't see much difference in a Xofelf defending the pl on Abomination and Clyton's defense.
In post 1149, Always wrote:For the record--in the Nero vs. AIR debate, purely on an objective note, Nero's getting absolutely massacred by AIR. The whole debate is a whole bundle-load of null not really changing my opinion on either slot, but if you were to label one side a winner in the fight, it'd be hands-down AIR.
*shrugz*
lo siento. Like really sad you feel this way 'cause they are scum and you are misreading an AP slot wrong AGAIN! But I really don't see any town motivation in: Ice's bandwagon hop unto me with such shitty reasoning as "his language was strange!", AP lying that Ice had asked me who was scum on my wagon and Ice's mini-tirade when I pointed this out, saying that he's played with a lurky scum Shos and therefore believed this as scum meta while calling me bad for believing that Shos' lurking was scum motivated.
+
In post 770, AngryIcerink wrote:which come to think of it is relatively consistent with you being scum and knowing my alignment (vs. actually thinking I am scum).
this is just so lol
I also very much dislike
In post 773, AngryIcerink wrote:1. Your stated rationale for no longer voted for Abomination is that there's "no traction" for lynching him
Which totes ignores the context of my unvote on Abomination. I understand that his wagon "dissipated" as he says but we were not arguing this. He pretty much sheeped Mist who said I was scummy for unvoting Abom.
His reasoning for calling Shos town 'cause his wagon is EZ is
ONLY
relevant in single scum team games. This seems overly dense.
I also really don't think 1036 makes much sense so meh.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
