DeathSauce wrote:I also want to point out something I just noticed in your bolded quote from Zep above. Zep asks "Please elaberate on why you decided to ask why you should vote on scum rather than just vote on him..." which is a minor misrepresentation of what I said. I asked if there was any reason NOT to vote Alasdair, not for reasons why I should vote for him. A small matter but still...
Your last post also seems scummy to me for a couple of reasons. First, you admit that the whole basis for the vote was OMGUS that was held over from the previous person. The other reason has to do with what you have previously said:zep wrote:unvote
Ive been reading what DeathSauce has been saying and hes very pro town with his posts. I shouldn't have judged him off DLFM's play. I think DLFM was just out for me and I took it personal. I guess we just have to wait for the others to pick up their prods or wait for replacments.
Once again showing inconsistencies.zePPeLiN wrote:You can't just ignore a previous players actions when his replacement comes.
This seems like he is dodging my question with a blunt answer..DeathSauce wrote:It was obvious that Alasdair was scum and I would have been happy to hammer, but I thought I'd ask a question and see if I got a response first.
This is pretty much what I thought happened, and I honestly had to re-read the thread just to make sure Norinel was the one getting the details mixed up, and not me.Norinel wrote:Yes, that was a misremembering on my part. But you did put a vote on right after DeathSauce registered suspicion, which could be a matter of following any lead that people might go along with; I think that's what I'd confused.
By what logic have you arrived at this conclusion? I disagree, and wonder if this is a fishing trip.DeathSauce wrote:it doesn't appear that we have a cop
Even so, this is no excuse to rush things. There are very few posts from all of us, and unless we get lucky tonight, day three will be incredibly hard for the two town players to come together. (I admit I could be mistaken here, as I am a newer player and find the endgame to still be a little tricky)DeathSauce wrote:No matter what happens tonight the town has a pretty good shot at winning this game.
I agree, which is why I posted above that we need content to base theories on.Day One was successful but left us with little information to use for Day Two. I don't want to repeat that trend.
I'm an idiot. For some reason it didn't occur to me that the cop might have investigated an innocent townie in night one. I was stuck in the line of thought that the cop should come forward and announce that they had found the scum. I beg pardon. If there is a cop, please do not feel pressured to say anything.DeathSauce wrote:
it doesn't appear that we have a cop
By what logic have you arrived at this conclusion? I disagree, and wonder if this is a fishing trip.
Seems like me and you are the only ones that are being suspected by other players. It seems like DeathSauce and Peter are drawing more suspicion towards you, so you try to draw more suspicion towards me and hope people will jump on due to lack of activity.Norinel wrote:I'd be up for a zep lynch, since he's been spending most of the game focusing on DLMF/DeathSauce for reasons that were basically lost in the crash and then replaced out.
I dropped my suspicion of DeathSauce, and stated that i was wrong for suspecting him the way I did.zePPeLiN wrote:I did think DeathSauce was suspicious , because of DLFM's play. Then i read what he was saying and he seemed townie.
The deadline isn't for two weeks. Since there is a deadline at all, we need to at least turn the discussion towards a lynch of someone,Peter wrote:If you are "up for a zep lynch" why didn't you vote on him?
I'm not waiting for someone to vote, I'd like everyone to discuss the possible lynch targets.Are you waiting for someone else to vote? If so, why?
In the current situation, a second vote would be reasonable if it were backed up by some sort of evidence and/or discussion. At that point, I didn't feel zep had enough for me to do so, but it wasn't a matter of how anyone else would perceive it.Are you worried how you will be perceived if you put the second vote on someone? If so, why?
People keep acting like there's some sort of case against me, but nobody's actually made one except for that I didn't vote Alasdair at my first opportunity, the "buddying up" thing a little while back that's already been addressed, and me misremembering a point about the thread. None of those are anything close to signs of scumminess, but people just keep saying I'm suspicious. Why does anyone think I'm more likely to be scum anyone else?zep wrote:Seems like me and you are the only ones that are being suspected by other players. It seems like DeathSauce and Peter are drawing more suspicion towards you,
And again, you're trying to act like there's a much stronger case against me than there actually is. The argument you're trying to use on me directing suspicion towards the only other obvious target is even better applied to you, I think. One or two people have mentioned that they're kind of suspicious, and you're trying to turn it into me struggling for my life against astounding and brilliant arguments.Please dont hammer until he answers Peters Questions. Id like to see what he has to say.
I am not manipulating your logic, I am pointing out inconsitencies.Zep wrote:You are trying to manipulate my logic. I did think DeathSauce was suspicious , because of DLFM's play. Then i read what he was saying and he seemed townie.
You may say that now, but at the time all you did was ignore him and lash out for him questioning you. And how is he 'dodging with a blunt answer'? That doesn't even make sense. If he is giving a 'blunt' answer, then he couldn't have dodged your question (and he didn't dodge your question, he answered it). I don't really know what you mean by "where is the reason behind the question?" That was what I wanted to know about your re-questioning him without answering him.zep wrote:Also the only reason i restated my question was because.:
DeathSauce wrote:
It was obvious that Alasdair was scum and I would have been happy to hammer, but I thought I'd ask a question and see if I got a response first.
This seems like he is dodging my question with a blunt answer..i asked to see if i get a responce. Where is the reason behind the question?
Nor wrote:And again, you're trying to act like there's a much stronger case against me than there actually is. The argument you're trying to use on me directing suspicion towards the only other obvious target is even better applied to you, I think. One or two people have mentioned that they're kind of suspicious, and you're trying to turn it into me struggling for my life against astounding and brilliant arguments.
So... your vote appears to be an OMGUS vote, leaving Drunk or me to hammer. Do you 100% think Norinel is scum? If not, do you feel you have enough information to pick the scum correctly day three?Zep wrote:Seems like me and you are the only ones that are being suspected by other players. It seems like DeathSauce and Peter are drawing more suspicion towards you, so you try to draw more suspicion towards me and hope people will jump on due to lack of activity.
vote Norinelputs him at -1 lynch.
Well, no, actually. That just leavesPeter Venkman wrote:So... your vote appears to be an OMGUS vote, leaving Drunk or me to hammer. Do you 100% think Norinel is scum? If not, do you feel you have enough information to pick the scum correctly day three?
-Peter