In post 650, talah wrote:Actually he does have at least one other completed game, as I played in it with him under an alt.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=36653
(actually not sure if we were in it at the same time but I read along after I died and have roughly the same read on him now as I did then. which is 'no fucking idea')
I'm with Justin here. Burning flips town, Crash can go down in flames.
@Mod: V/LA until end 8th June
I'll check back before deadline, though.
BE's replace out is def alignment neutral given this evidence. I definitely know the feeling of not having enough time for a game and everyone getting paranoid as fuck over it and given it happened to him before I think there's a greater chance it's what happened here (although that doesn't necessarily mean he's town).
In post 653, Paschendale wrote:You were certainly doing it differently, attempting to discredit me as a player, rather than simply attacking a single theory. The difference is that you attempted to discount future theories that I had not yet made. It came across as very personal very quickly, which is why I naturally thought that your Saki was the real Saki, as we tend not to get along. Your attacks were not simply to better scumhunt, but to try to nullify my credibility. That is anti-town.
Of course it's not impossible for us to work together. By doing so, you would have the opportunity to change my mind. But you squandered that opportunity. A defeatist attitude that you could never get me to trust you definitely seems like a scum thought to me. Scum tend to view people as allies and enemies, while town wants to enlist everyone they possibly can in pursuit of their target.
My time for mafia is limited. I have more productive things to do than continuously argue with you when it's a huge distraction from finding scum. This is even more so the case when we seem to disagree on every single thing, as I don't see how us working this out is beneficial at all to us finding scum, and it would take a shitton of effort to do so.
Just as an example of this, you did the same thing I accused penguin of doing. I do not feel you're trying to understand the motivation behind our posts and instead you try to fit our play to fit a theory of all town or scum should play, which, again, I disagree with on a fundamental level (IME, defeatism comes from town a lot). Plus, given it is a general theory, I wouldn't expect you to change your mind on it. Are you really that surprised I didn't want to jump through all the hoops to resolve all this?
I figure it's a better and more productive use of both of our time and energy to agree to disagree and move on.
This is not very compelling. It's a pretty passionless argument.
It's not supposed to be? I just said I don't think penguin is scum anymore.
