Nightfall: 4 (Ether Glork CES Patrick)
Cogito Ergo Sum: 3 (Nightfall MBL Thesp)
MrBuddyLee: 1 (Mgm)
Not voting: Zindaras
I've said before that I trust you, MBL and Glork about as far as I can throw you, but if none of you reach the chopping block, it's got to be Ether.Patrick wrote:Mgm - what do you think is the best play right now?
My views don't really change much based on a deadline.Patrick wrote:Mgm, that question was asked really in context of the deadline, which has now disappeared anyway.
Can we lynch him and CES?MrBuddyLee wrote:Zindaras should be lynched.
Discuss.
Patrick wrote:Vote: Zindarasno reason not to go back to my top suspect with deadline extended.
Glork wrote:Why?
Largely his reactions to me and especially to ChannelDelibird. He practically ignores the discussion surrounding ChannelDelibird when it's at the most volatile. I'm also compelled by the proposed scum argument on the Thesp-lynch failure:Glork re: my inclinations to lynch Zindaras wrote:Why?
I also think his failure to show up is potentially induced by the fact he's in a difficult (perhaps even paralyzing) situation as scum.MrBuddyLee wrote:I reread Ether's posts surrounding the failure to Thesp-lynch and don't think her dithering looks guaranteed genuine. Your logic that she's not scum because she didn't hammer in a hammerable situation would imply that MBL, Nightfall, Thesp, Patrick, Ether are protown and the remaining scum are in {CES, MGM, Glork, Zindy}. I see Glork and MgM as significantly townish, which would narrow that list to {CES, Zindy} in my eyes.
Post 1304, MBL wrote:Ether "okay with a Zindilynch". Followed by a post with pretty much no analytical content about Zindy.
I'm aware that my defense here is "It was'Scum is back up! wrote:Town: All right, where were we?
Glork: Zindie or Nightfall dies.
Thesp: Or CES.
Glork: Or CES.
Patrick: Zindie.
Mgm: MBL, Glork or Patrick. (You people aresobandwagon.)
Patrick: Nuh-uh.
Ether: Zindie or Nightfall. No CES.
Actually--this was what bothered me on Day 2, and I still find it valid. Nightfall agreed and disagreed with my actions, which is fine and good as a supplement but didn't in this case tie into my alignment.Post 1304, MBL on Nightfall's PBP wrote:on Ether: paints more vividly, alternatively attacking and defending. Points out "misunderstanding" by Ether twice and "don't know if this is scummy in itself". Appears to be genuinely trying to ascertain the nature of Ether's attacks.
There's thePost 595, Nightfall wrote:Why is she so eager to take Andrew’s word and lash out against those that believe otherwise?