You're right. Not much of a reason, I agree. Is that some slick attempt of yours to try to derail my attempts to find scum? If the other two candidates are weak, perhaps you would be an interesting alternative. Thanks for showing up and signalling your interest for the job.Kison wrote:I don't see much of a reason to go for the other two of your candidates.
Let's see, here. We have Raffles, and two others who you have just admitted hold a much weaker case. We have a deadline, and therefore a limit to how much time we can spend looking, much less throwing votes aroundDrippingGoofball wrote:Is that some slick attempt of yours to try to derail my attempts to find scum?
So you're still trying to cut Raffles' votes, but with a different target? Lovely.DrippingGoofball wrote:If the other two candidates are weak, perhaps you would be an interesting alternative.
DrippingGoofball wrote:You're right. Not much of a reason, I agree.
Ironically, you agree with my reaction and are still trying to use it against me.DrippingGoofball wrote:We already have an interesting reaction from Kison.
DrippingGoofball wrote:You're right. Not much of a reason, I agree. Is that some slick attempt of yours to try to derail my attempts to find scum? If the other two candidates are weak, perhaps you would be an interesting alternative. Thanks for showing up and signalling your interest for the job.Kison wrote:I don't see much of a reason to go for the other two of your candidates.
See Raffles? We already have an interesting reaction from Kison. Let's shake before we bake.
unvote, vote: Kison
Perhaps. But then again, if he's scum, he has Raffles as a "justified" target for today. See, Flay has a clever case against Raffles, which is a convenient reason for the scum to hop on the wagon. Who can blame them, right? But if there is a scum amongst the contenders in the race to the deadline, they will try to re-focus on Raffles, etc.Battle Mage wrote:to be fair, Kison scum would never miss out on an opportunity to lynch me.
I don't see any of that, that was merely a random voting stage banter.PBug wrote:As individual players, regardless of the game's flow, Raffles has been exceptionally scummy through this entire game. He brilliantly distracted with the argument abou XReyoX's noobishness on Day 1, which became oh so much longer than it ever needed to be.
If you are talking about you guy's loaded questions of "but you are lying aren't you", then yes. I might have got a little irate.When the discussion is not going his way, he attempts the change the subject. When things still don't go his way, he quotes his post in which he attempts to change the subject several times, bolding and enlarging various parts of it, using sledgehammer and wrecking ball analogies along the way.
What's people's problem with metagaming? I don't see anyone else complaining about me trying to guess what the set up of this game maybe, that was the whole thing with ESE, remember? People speculating if there could be a cult involved? Now how unbalanced is that, 2 scum groups and a cult. I don't see people bitching about that.Then a metagame post, making assumptions about the number of scum, not at all considering the balance of the game in terms of pro-town power roles.
Speak for yourself.He actively lurks when he isn't acting out,
There was a reasoning, you just refused to take it in.his vote on OTU floating along unnoticed without any ascertainable reasoning.
Yes I post because I can. I also post in vein to try to help the town win. Problems? Maybe you'd prefer me to shut up and lurk so you can lurk with me.Oh so often he appears to post because he can.
Well it's true isn't it? At least my posts are somewhat more fruitiful than yours.Once he actually posts reasoning, there is the giant hypocrisy of 'I can't really extract any useful contribution to the town from him, despite the number of posts he may have made more than most.'
Long period of no post... oh look maybe you missed this?His vote does come off next post, I'll give him that. He gets stuck on ESE for a little while. Then a very long period of no real contribution. He does make the stunning point against MoS that despite the long stall on OTU's wagon, OTu was town. Now some bickering with MoS. His more recent actions have content, but only because he's arguing against a particular player.
If I die, I'll prove to you for second time the stalling votes are some good indication of someone not worth a lynch. And a good chance of being a town at that.Okay I'm going to have a restricted access starting immediate until 16th. I may or may not be able to post once a day. I hope you don't find a need to replace me.
Justified? Maybe. I'm not feeling all too optimistic about the outcome from this, but guess what? It's the closest we've got, and there's a deadline. Now, I support any scum-hunting, obviously, but I don't support the way you were trying to go about it, because it'd ultimately lead to the breaking of a wagon on what is the most leading case presented so far today. I guess it's good it has provided something to talk about, however.DrippingGoofball wrote:Perhaps. But then again, if he's scum, he has Raffles as a "justified" target for today. See, Flay has a clever case against Raffles, which is a convenient reason for the scum to hop on the wagon. Who can blame them, right? But if there is a scum amongst the contenders in the race to the deadline, they will try to re-focus on Raffles, etc.Battle Mage wrote:to be fair, Kison scum would never miss out on an opportunity to lynch me.
Please suggest a better alternative. I am very eager to follow your strategy. I notice that you forgot to say what your better strategy is in your post. It's probably an involuntary omission. I can't imagine why you'd say my strategy stinks without having a better plan ready for the town's examination and execution.Mastermind of Sin wrote:DGB's strategy stinks.
Bolded for emphasis. Nice try at making me look bad, DGB, but I already said it.Mastermind of Sin wrote:DGB's strategy stinks.If DGB was really interested in finding scum, she would suggest that people look to MORE than just BM, PBuG, and Raffles, so that we can get information on everyone.Her vote on Kison is just an opportunistic jump to the first person to oppose her ridiculous plan. There is no reason to spread votes around unless there is equally good logic for all the candidates being wagoned, and the logic against Raffles is far better than the weak suspicions on the other two. As it is, if I were to be convinced that Raffles was not the play today, I would probably switch my vote to DGB as a competing wagon. The chances that I will find time to go through and look at other players and analyze them by deadline are slim, considering this is finals week for me.