If this is not possible, could you at least prod:
spectrumvoid (more than a month of inactivity)
Wizardcat
bird1111
Akbar
Thx
I'd need to review things since I posted regarding him, DGB struck as being one of the most opportunistic on the OTU wagon. Plus she's not brought anything content wise to the game, either she's unhelpful town or lurker scum.XReyoX wrote:Although OTU has already been banished. I somehow want to hear the reasons why people have voted for him. This includes "Battle Mage, DrippingGoofball, Fuldu, Mastermind of Sin, Mr Flay, remussaidow, PBuG, Scarecrow, al4x, theopor_COD and IH." Some of the people didn't actually give their reasons.
@theopor_COD: You were pointing at remus before the end of D1. Do you not think he is a scum now?
Bah. That reminds me that remus did something in the now lost bits of the original Day Two that had me voting him. I wish I could remember what it was.XReyoX wrote:@theopor_COD: You were pointing at remus before the end of D1. Do you not think he is a scum now?
It might have been, but it's not exactly fair to to be speculating on why I suspected someone when the material isn't here any more. I just didn't want to give him a complete pass on it.XReyoX wrote:@Fuldu: I can't remember as well. Could it be something about his comment on the night scene?
As time went on and OTU didn't really respond to people's concerns and then vanished altogether, he became a better lynch in my eyes, especially for Day One.XReyoX wrote:@theopor_COD, Fuldu, DGB: Are all your reasons listed in my list. Was those all the reasons that made you think OTU was the right lynch?
pointed out earlier by Fuldu earlier, is just creepy. "Somebody else please hammer this person I unvoted so they can get blamed for it and not me!"Raffles wrote:OTU has disappeared at most crucial of times...
I'm not there to place the hammer when the deadline comes I'm afraid, someone else needs to do that.
from the least, you are the first one to point out that the lack of movement of the wagon is suspicious, and to me was a point worth considering at that time. Together with the increase in your activity and constantly asking otu to contribute makes me think you are less scummy than the others in the list atm. sorry that i've missed that reason.Mr. Flay wrote:XReyoX: You also missed that I asked him to vote for someone, repeatedly, so we could see who he was suspicious of. And he explicitly posted 3 times without claiming, but stalling/"having difficulty".
Combine that with his distancing from al4 today, and I say we've got another ESE member.
That makes no sense. If I was a scum, why would it matter to me if I lynch a scum or a townie? Sure, it might be a better idea to lynch the opponent scum, but I wouldn't be a one to bitch so long as I don't lynch my scummate.Mr. Flay wrote:But Raffles' unvote as the deadline loomed is scummy to me in the "oh crap I'm gonna lynch a townie" sense, his reasoning for hopping off is confused
Getting a town lynch is not always worse than no lynch i think. If we didn't lynch anyone, the doc might not be able to work out what to do last night. Ending up with 2 townie NK with nothing to go on today would be worse than the situation we are at atm.Raffles wrote:Well given either no lynch or OTU, which one would you want? I know which one I would go for.
First of all, I agree with you here, XReyoX. No-lynch basically sets us back, primarily because we have very little to go on the next day. In OTU's case, he was participating less and less, and even as a town, that's not a huge loss to us in comparison to someone who had been participating more, while the case against him wasn't necessarily weak.XReyoX wrote:Getting a town lynch is not always worse than no lynch i think. If we didn't lynch anyone, the doc might not be able to work out what to do last night. Ending up with 2 townie NK with nothing to go on today would be worse than the situation we are at atm.Raffles wrote:Well given either no lynch or OTU, which one would you want? I know which one I would go for.
This includes " vote raffles because Mr Flay's has put up a strong case"XReyoX wrote:BM
#145. OTU look alot worse than anyone else.
#202. OTU seems very scummy at the moment.vote
#207. Not only did u commit the major scumtell of voting me for no reason, you have also been acting very scummy in this game so far.
#439. I also agree that the lack of movement on the OTU wagon is very suspicious.
The case against him wasn't strong in my opinion. The problem was that no one appeared incredibly scummy. Something about remus was building up at the end of the day but it was too late. Also, when hundreds of people were focusing on OTU's post, someone would obviously find a scumtell, not to mention that there are also scums making fake reasons and magnifying them. I was expecting OTU to be a vanilla if he is a town. I generally think that power-role people would commit more since the game would be more interesting to them. Now, this has proven that I was wrong.Kison wrote:In OTU's case, he was participating less and less, and even as a town, that's not a huge loss to us in comparison to someone who had been participating more, while the case against him wasn't necessarily weak.
You look cleaner if you're not on the mislynch, duh. Scum backaway sharpish when a deadline hits, since they get the joys of a mislynch, and not having to be on it, therefore not connecting them to the town lynch.Raffles wrote:That makes no sense. If I was a scum, why would it matter to me if I lynch a scum or a townie? Sure, it might be a better idea to lynch the opponent scum, but I wouldn't be a one to bitch so long as I don't lynch my scummate.