That's right, it's another "I'm free; I'm finally
free
" statement that'll be rendered obsolete in about 12 hours. I'm bitter.
Post 855, Nightfall wrote:I hope that makes more sense now.
Okay. It wasn't really saying anything about scumminess or opinion or anything interesting at all, then. Pfeh, I was getting my hopes up.
Post 863, Glork wrote:So, um, Ether... why no hammer before you went to bed?
Well, I definitely had the chance. I dimly remember staring at his posts two hours before deadline trying to remember why I had offered the hammer. These thoughts were based on how scummy I found him as opposed to the parity issues I'd spoken of when I said I'd hammer, and my Thespscum thoughts have never gone very far.
Glork wrote:Ether, did you actually find AndrewS
scummy
for not expecting to be FoS'd?
I found him scummy for immediately shrinking back when he took flak for his vote.
I'd argue with the rest of the 880-on-me section of the PBP, but I think that clears up the '180' and your explicit questions and I think I'll start fuming if I ever have to place "Andrew" and "WIFOM" in the same sentence again.
Glork wrote:Doesn't like MGM, but likes IH less. Reasons, Ether? Reasons are always nice.
My stance on Mgm was, "Um,
okay
." At the time, I was trying to decide whether Mgm was useless or outright sinister (something I haven't really come to a conclusion on, but the innocent helps). IH attacked Mgm, and I was under the impression that he initiated this. (Looking back, that's not completely true.) This implied that they were not together.
Glork wrote:Sound reminiscent of D2 when she said she'd hammer Thesp? Hmm.
I do not understand the significance of this remark.
Post 886, MBL wrote:(Making them look FOSable in the process) Cause the way I see it, it's much more likely that you're scum and your scumpartners weren't willing to pile on.
The WIFOM is mostly based on my own actions and I'd really rather leave it to other people--but I find this counterintuitive.
Post 881, Mgm wrote:Keeping your vote there wasn't helping in securing a
.
Vote:Patrick
for not using his vote to help secure a useful lynch (any lynch other than myself).
Hmm?
Glork wrote:Interestingly enough, Zindie commits one of my favorite scumtells in
641, protecting CDB. Thesp accuses CDB of being lurkerscum. Zindie replies by wanting to look at other lurkers, too.
I find this intriguing, especially remembering Zindaras's statement on Patrick on Day 1. In general, I like the attacks on Zindaras. I'm bored.
Day 2, Post 651, Patrick wrote:FoS Thesp.
That is such a reaching argument. You're case against CDB is reaching and of roughly the same quality as your case against Andrew was. There's something not quite right about your play compared too times I've seen you as town.
No, seriously. You explicitly said here that Thesp was out of character, but your later statements have contradicted this. Please explain.
Fritzler wrote:ether the 30 year old creepy guy?
*spits on Fritzler*