Mini 1505: N is for Normal (game over)

Skelda · Post Post #1275 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:17 am

Tool could have hammered zakk if he was bad, but he didn't. So tool could only be bad with zakk, butI believe his claim anyway.

zakk · Post Post #1276 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:29 am

There is absolutely no tool/zakk otherwise we'd have hammered Garmr

There is absolutely no Skelda/Garmr otherwise Skelda would have never put Garmr at L-1

zakk · Post Post #1277 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:32 am

Possibilities are:

zakk/tool
zakk/skelda
zakk/elyse
zakk/garmr

skelda/tool
skelda/elyse
skelda/garmr

elyse/tool
elyse/garmr

tool/garmr

I can safely rule out the entire first group.
I can also rule out Skelda/Garmr due to the above, so that leaves me with:

skelda/tool
skelda/elyse
elyse/tool
elyse/garmr
tool/garmr

And regardless of my feelings on Garmr I'm leaving him in.

Now who else should I be eliminating and why?

zakk · Post Post #1278 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:32 am

In post 1275, Skelda wrote:Tool could have hammered zakk if he was bad, but he didn't. So tool could only be bad with zakk, butI believe his claim anyway.

Tool could still be bad with you.

zakk · Post Post #1279 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:34 am

How could Tool have hammered me? I don't see that. I see that you were voting me, then Tool voted Garmr, and you switched to Garmr.

Skelda · Post Post #1280 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:35 am

In post 1276, zakk wrote:There is absolutely no tool/zakk otherwise we'd have hammered Garmr

There is absolutely no Skelda/Garmr otherwise Skelda would have never put Garmr at L-1

Yeah, realized that after posting it. And I don't buy that second point, but since you do...

Then who am I scum with? You're voting for me, you should know. Tool is confirmed town. Elyse would have to be with Garmr if she was bad. You'd have to be with Garmr if you were bad. And according to you, I now can't be with Garmr.

If you really believe that, then I am also confirmed, and you shouldn't be voting for me. Check and mate.

Skelda · Post Post #1281 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:37 am

Elyse and I were voting zakk. Tool came in and voted Garmr. At that point, if he'd voted zakk he would have one.

If Elyse was scum with me she'd vote for Garmr at this point. Literally the only person I would have a remote possibility of being bad with is Garmr.

zakk · Post Post #1282 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:38 am

Oh wait yeah, tool could have hammered me. Okay, tool is town.

Skelda · Post Post #1283 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:38 am

*won I'm going nutty.

zakk · Post Post #1284 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:39 am

Unvote

btw

Skelda · Post Post #1285 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:39 am

Zakk, Garmr is confirmed scum. Give me a situation he wouldn't be bad in.

Garmr · Post Post #1286 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:40 am

dude i could of hammered zakk to when you put him at l-1 I was online at that time......

Skelda · Post Post #1287 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:40 am

But you didn't because you are scumbuddies?

zakk · Post Post #1288 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:41 am

Okay Tool is pretty much confirmed town right now because he didn't vote for me and unless he was just really not paying attention, I know he's not my scumbuddy so there's that.

Elyse is also likely to be town because she could have hammered Garmr adn didn't, unless she's scum with Garmr, which seems unlikely but that's something I'll be looking into shortly.

Have any of us thought about the possibility that there might only be 1 scum left? That seems ridiculous, but possibilities are rapidly deteriorating.

zakk · Post Post #1289 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:42 am

Darn it Garmr, I trusted you. If Garmr is scum, I throw EVERYTHING out the window. EVERYTHING.

Garmr · Post Post #1290 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:42 am

But I didn't because I'm town and I want to win.

zakk · Post Post #1291 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:43 am

Oh, Garmr, you're online. Great. Hi

Skelda · Post Post #1292 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:44 am

Garmr, actually that is even more damning for you because it means that, if it is true, you couldn't be scum with Elyse or me which leaves only zakk and Garmr.

zakk · Post Post #1293 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:44 am

I literally just deleted a post where I was voting you, because I want to talk to you about some stuff.

So... tell me why you're not scum right now please thanks?

zakk · Post Post #1294 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:44 am

In post 1292, Skelda wrote:Garmr, actually that is even more damning for you because it means that, if it is true, you couldn't be scum with Elyse or me which leaves only zakk and Garmr.

I'm not scum though, so try again.

Also, I still think you're scum.

Skelda · Post Post #1295 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:45 am

In post 1294, zakk wrote:
In post 1292, Skelda wrote:Garmr, actually that is even more damning for you because it means that, if it is true, you couldn't be scum with Elyse or me which leaves only zakk and Garmr.
I'm not scum though, so try again.

Also, I still think you're scum.

With who?

Garmr · Post Post #1296 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:46 am

Elysee is a good candidate.

zakk · Post Post #1297 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:46 am

Ok so Tool could have hammered me but didn't (1.5 hours at L-1)
Elyse could have hammered Garmr but didn't (don't remember how long)

zakk · Post Post #1298 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:46 am

Garmr, why wouldn't Elyse have hammered you, if Skelda was scum with Elyse?

zakk · Post Post #1299 (ISO) » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:47 am

I didn't hammer Garmr either, for that matter. I still have my doubts but I came very close to doing it.