Mini 404: Diablo Mafia (Game Over)

[Mr Stoofer]

MOD

: Please can you prod/hurt Aelyn?

[Mr. Flay]

Stoof! Welcome to Hell.

SO, Flay:

Interesting. Vote: livingod though, speculating on the night's actions.

Any other reason's for that?

Well, there's TJM's 9th-14th posts in the thread, wherein he basically defends livingod against all comers. That doesn't bode well, and while it could be defense of a 'known' townie (from a scum perspective, they know who isn't on their team), that's not a very smart strategy for D1 when most bandwagons are essentially random. TJM seems to have panicked.

Basically, livingod's (and your) posts look like stunned surprise that the nightkill didn't go through. Skruffs is not far behind though, for reasons already outlined.

[Thestatusquo]

Like, I am not sure why LG would so strongly defend a scum buddy, however. Does he have any other games that anyone knows of so I can check if he's taken that strategy before?

[Mr Stoofer]

I am not sure why LG would so strongly defend a scum buddy

Mr. Flay said (rightly) that TJM defended livinggod, not the other way round. Or are you referring to something else.

[Zindaras]

Voting Update

:

livingod

: 2 (Mr. Flay, chaotic_diablo)

Skruffs

: 2 (Thestatusquo, Mr Stoofer)

Not Voting

: 7 (Aelyn, Cogito Ergo Sum, DragonsofSummer, livingod, remussaidow, Save the Dragons, Skruffs)

With 11 players alive, it's

6 to lynch

.

Aelyn will be prodded.

[Thestatusquo]

No, just got my names garbled. I was wondering why TJM would so strongly defend a scumbuddy, seeing as it's a tactic that most scum players would try to avoid, myself included.

[Mr Stoofer]

OK. A fair point, though I didn't detect a great amount of skill in TJM's play on my read through.

Anyway, Skruffs is today's lynch.

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

That's good enough for me.

Vote: Skruffs

[Skruffs]

Except I'm not?
Why the speedlynch, guys?

[Thestatusquo]

Skruffs, 3 votes over several days is hardly a speedlynch. *hugs*

[Skruffs]

I am very very curious why nobody is pushing for more from TSQ. TSQ was the one who was *valiantly* struggling to keep TJM from having to claim - wanting a claim - any claim from DOS and then refusing it when he got it. He later said a whole bunch of stuff about how scum always gets fake claims, blah blah blah. HE FOSed me for agreeing with him about DOS - I thought he had made a fairly agreeable argument, personally.

Mr. Flay - have you gone back through my posts like you did TJM?
You seemed determined to get me lynched as soon as I hammered TJM - you even said so. Is your attack on me based on anything other than a quote from a Monkey Island game with a smiley at the end? Have you looked at my other quotes?

C-D : Remember this?

At the time you brought the bandwagon, there was already another wagon with 5 votes that isn't based on randomness. That is currently a "full-fledged" bandwagon. Starting another bandwagon is a distraction since it gives the pressured leeway and a chance to escape. In addition, it can be argued that you might also be his partner, hence you didn't find TJM scummy.

Hint : It was before the claims, and it wasn't me you directed it towards.

Anyways so yeah if TJM is scum it's likely that TSQ is too, if DOS is scum it's likely that CES or Remus might be as well.
Personally, I'm willing to accept both claims. THis goes agaginst Livingod, who wants to lynch both of them. Greedy little bugga.

In short, the easy lynch is not the right lynch. You can lynch me, and be sad because you lynched me, and it was the wrong lynch, or you can lynch

THE STATUS QUO

and be happy and whatnot. I feel I'm being lynched for putting the hammer on scum, or for contemplating his claim, etc... but I can fully understand the reasoning behind it.

What sucks is that after a mislynch today you guys will completely forget about what I said about TSQ tommorrow, and lynch livingod or someone else, instead. And that makes me sad. v.v Sad little demon tears, pouring down my face. v.v

[Skruffs]

Over one day, actually. 24 hours and 6 minutes, SCUM!!!

[Skruffs]

I'm just really curious why Mr. Flay is going after me for those reasons when I actions have been mostly in response to other people's actions. He doesn't go after TSQ at all in his post, nor does he go into my posts where I get all up on TJM and DOS both for their "I already proved my reasons" vs "I don't believe them ergo they don't exist" thing - something that livingod was heavily involved in. Maybe you guys should go back and see what really happened. You are voting for hte right reasons, however, you are pushing for the wrong person.
I think I'm starting to repeat myself.. oh well. I replaced in around page 11 - why not read from page 10 on and see who's on who's side.
I wouldn't be asking a reread if I didn't think it wasn't importand

[remussaidow]

Shea, care to answer my question yet?

Its odd that it was speculated on that no one's pressed you when I have, in fact, asked why you've voted how you did. Also, your failure to answer the question makes Skruffs points seem all the sharper.

[Mr. Flay]

Is it possible you're confused? I'm pushing for livingod as the lynch for today, not you, Skruffs. Mr

Stoofer

is on your bandwagon, so that may be where you're confused. And no, I haven't done a PBPA on you yet. Should I?

Honestly, if the farewell message you sent to TJM when you lynched him is from Monkey Island (something I didn't know), that would alleviate

some

of my concerns about you; right now you're about third down on my list, and I believe livingod is the much stronger play for today.

[Skruffs]

You are right.
I don't know why I am having such a hard time keeping everyone's names straight in this game. I don't have that problem in others.
My apologies, Mr. FLay.
I definitely meant the EVIL MR. STOOFER!!
(evil in the baad way, not in the good way)

[DragonsofSummer]

Vote: Livingod

Livingod has been trying to throw suspicion on to random people ever since he stopped his 'random' stage and keep it off of himself and for a few posts TJM as well. The main thing I find off in how he has played the game so far is how much he pushed against CES day one even when no one seemed to agree with him. Also he hasn't really put in many opinions other than the ones against CES.

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

Hmm, I'm somewhat confused now.

[livingod]

Ahem, do you mean C_D?

I still think he's scum, but not as strongly. Also DOS and Shea. But I feel that Shea is the best candidate for the day.

vote shea

.

[Cogito Ergo Sum]

Okay,

Unvote, vote: livingod

.

[chaotic_diablo]

Woah, four votes on livingod. Quick wagon, not that I dislike it.

I feel stupid, but who's shea? I'm guessing it's My. Flay through the posts, but I just want to be sure.

[remussaidow]

TSQ

[Mr Stoofer]

First, although I know who Shea is, please can we stick to mafiascum usernames. It's confusing and exclusionary to use AIM names.

Secondly, Skruffs's posts are totally incomprehensible to me now since I don't know which bits were errors and which bits were correct; so if you have anything to say to me please repost it in clearer language.

Thirdly, I see the benefit of a livingod wagon. But if anyone wants me to switch to TSQ, they are going to have to go into more detail (like a PBPA). The fact that my first and second choices both want to lynch TSQ gives me warm feelings towards him.

[Thestatusquo]

Well, I would like to point out that my real name is Shea, which makes it not really AIM.

Remus, I can't find the questions you are referring to. Could you point me to a post number, please?

Skruffs, please go down your list of points against me again, I'm not responding to garble.

LG: Why am I "the best candidate for the day."?

[remussaidow]

interesting...

I'm really not quite sure what to make of this...

SO, Flay:

Interesting. Vote: livingod though, speculating on the night's actions.

Any other reason's for that?

TSQ:

Vote: Skruffs

Why?

CES: Why'd you say "they left?"

you're tsq.