In post 524, Garmr wrote:F-16_Fighting_Falcon is TColds replacement right.
he replaced guthrie
In post 524, Garmr wrote:F-16_Fighting_Falcon is TColds replacement right.
Then you haven't been reading.In post 522, Thor665 wrote:That is pretty blatantly not what he was saying.In post 520, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I have no recollection of Thor before this game. Seriously. You just made that "you brought baggage with Thor into this game" bit.
If you are town you have been counter productive, a long with slandaar you have brought in some serious baggage with thor which has poisoned this game so far and I wouldnt be surprised if its revealed at the end that its the reason we've had players *requesting* replacements, not just dropping out, but actually saying *No I want out*
1) I already answered this at the beginning of the last page.In post 521, Thor665 wrote: @ABR - why do you think your case on me got as far as it did for what it was if I am scum?
Also, what pro-town end effect did you get out of it to make the lie worthwhile?
In post 529, Albert B. Rampage wrote:1) I already answered this at the beginning of the last page.In post 521, Thor665 wrote: @ABR - why do you think your case on me got as far as it did for what it was if I am scum?
Also, what pro-town end effect did you get out of it to make the lie worthwhile?
2) You're leading the town less and more people are posting content.
The reason I made it up is because I wanted to teach you that if you go against me, this is what will come of it. It's not wise for you to go against me. I'm stronger. I scumhunt better. I get who I want lynched more often than you do. Remember that.
This post quoted above shows a complete misunderstanding, and lack of reading of this game.In post 530, Sir Bastion wrote:Exactly.In post 529, Albert B. Rampage wrote:As for the *baggage* yes, it is an error in that comment. You did claim not to remember thor prior to this game.
In post 528, Thor665 wrote:He is saying that you brought baggage into the game.
Read it as 'increased drama'
And not 'brought drama from a point in the past'
Exactly.In post 530, Sir Bastion wrote:As for the *baggage* yes, it is an error in that comment. You did claim not to remember thor prior to this game.
This post quoted above shows a complete misunderstanding, and lack of reading of this game.In post 528, Thor665 wrote:He is saying that you brought baggage into the game.
Read it as 'increased drama'
And not 'brought drama from a point in the past'
It makes sense if you had a question at the end but the question is very very important so no your example isn't good.In post 497, Thor665 wrote: You *are* agreeing with me that my example makes sense except that it ends in a conclusion.
lolIn post 497, Thor665 wrote: You continually crop Tool's post to cut out his conclusion and focus on the examples and a question - in other words cutting his post in half and then suggesting he's working overhard to explain something that goes nowhere.
What baggage?In post 518, Sir Bastion wrote: If you are town you have been counter productive, a long with slandaar you have brought in some serious baggage with thor which has poisoned this game so far and I wouldnt be surprised if its revealed at the end that its the reason we've had players *requesting* replacements, not just dropping out, but actually saying *No I want out*
What you are implying is scum sheeped the case which means that in fact your suspicions are in the wrong places.In post 521, Thor665 wrote: @ABR - why do you think your case on me got as far as it did for what it was if I am scum?
Before a game even begins you know we will not agree on logic especially if we are both town and you know that actually all that will happen is wall wars where we just don't come to agreement and want to lynch the other.
During game Thor tries to argue my logic is scummy.
Doesn't make sense, I expect if you were town you would have tried alternative methods like seeing if I lurk hard or not, but instead you went the superficial way of arguing logic which is ultimately pointless and not actually going to get you a read that is useful because it always ends the same way. Add to that the fact I have ALWAYS (when town) been correct and it is just a ridiculous strategy from a TownThor plus its always to do with how things are worded so at a minimum a TownThor should have at least tweaked a little.
How can someone expect to read me with a method which is proven not to work?
I glanced over it, thought "This is pretty unimportant, I'm going to pay attention to things that actually matter now", and the more you and Thor went on about it the more sure I was that one of you was scum.Slandaar wrote: So the answer is no you had no clue and thus it needed attention considering it is Thors entire case.
That you're oversensitive about having the wording slightly changed to explain why he thinks what you did was scummy. Let me give an example:Slandaar wrote: What do you think about Thors case on me being completely made up by changing my wording?
Those things are pretty much the same thing, with a spin on it to emphasize how unreasonable you're being. And you call it a misrep (I'm starting to begin to think no one in this game actually understands what misrepresentation is).Slandaar wrote: Side by side
Thors Version: that might make sense...except he didn't offer a conclusion!
Actual Version: My example was more accurate because yours ends with a conclusion and his posts did not.
The voting patterns indicate that Slandaar and Albert areThor wrote: @Ice - Actually, looking at those reads, I'm starting to lean 'not Slaandar' with ABR, really. What do you think about that?
Well if you want to call meta baggage...In post 536, Sir Bastion wrote:baggage:
Before a game even begins you know we will not agree on logic especially if we are both town and you know that actually all that will happen is wall wars where we just don't come to agreement and want to lynch the other.
During game Thor tries to argue my logic is scummy.
Doesn't make sense, I expect if you were town you would have tried alternative methods like seeing if I lurk hard or not, but instead you went the superficial way of arguing logic which is ultimately pointless and not actually going to get you a read that is useful because it always ends the same way. Add to that the fact I have ALWAYS (when town) been correct and it is just a ridiculous strategy from a TownThor plus its always to do with how things are worded so at a minimum a TownThor should have at least tweaked a little.
How can someone expect to read me with a method which is proven not to work?
Heh.In post 539, Slandaar wrote:Well if you want to call meta baggage...In post 536, Sir Bastion wrote:baggage:
Before a game even begins you know we will not agree on logic especially if we are both town and you know that actually all that will happen is wall wars where we just don't come to agreement and want to lynch the other.
During game Thor tries to argue my logic is scummy.
Doesn't make sense, I expect if you were town you would have tried alternative methods like seeing if I lurk hard or not, but instead you went the superficial way of arguing logic which is ultimately pointless and not actually going to get you a read that is useful because it always ends the same way. Add to that the fact I have ALWAYS (when town) been correct and it is just a ridiculous strategy from a TownThor plus its always to do with how things are worded so at a minimum a TownThor should have at least tweaked a little.
How can someone expect to read me with a method which is proven not to work?
No they are not the same thing, look similar, but the change makes the meaning different.In post 537, ICEninja wrote: Those things are pretty much the same thing, with a spin on it to emphasize how unreasonable you're being. And you call it a misrep (I'm starting to begin to think no one in this game actually understands what misrepresentation is).
Its you.In post 540, Sir Bastion wrote: Heh.
Perhaps its just me, but expecting a player to act a certain way because you played against each other before is not meta.
1. You answered things. You did not answer my specific question.In post 529, Albert B. Rampage wrote:1) I already answered this at the beginning of the last page.In post 521, Thor665 wrote: @ABR - why do you think your case on me got as far as it did for what it was if I am scum?
Also, what pro-town end effect did you get out of it to make the lie worthwhile?
2) You're leading the town less and more people are posting content.
Correct, I said misrep - oddly my misrep description specifically noted how you weren't addressing what he really did, and my cropping comment is not an actual different comment.In post 533, Slandaar wrote:This was not your point previously as you clearly never said anything about cropping posts.
In post 533, Slandaar wrote:Anyways... Where exactly have I done this 'cropping'?
What I am implying is that scum were on the wagon.In post 535, Slandaar wrote:What you are implying is scum sheeped the case which means that in fact your suspicions are in the wrong places.In post 521, Thor665 wrote: @ABR - why do you think your case on me got as far as it did for what it was if I am scum?
Otherwise town sheeped and then the answer is town sheeped so???
"I expect X to avoid challenging me on this issue, because when me and X fight like this in the last game we get into such a hissy girly fight that one of us ended up lynched. So X will not challenge me even though he doesnt know if I'm scum or not he will leave me be and not question me or pressure me or come near me in any form because last time that ended badly for us "In post 542, Slandaar wrote:Its you.In post 540, Sir Bastion wrote: Heh.
Perhaps its just me, but expecting a player to act a certain way because you played against each other before is not meta.
'I expect X to be more loud as scum if scum here because I caught him lurking scum last time'
Meta.
This is redonkulousIn post 479, Garmr wrote:@maxous
To anwser your post 391 which i just read after isoing.
I haven't stayed away from the Abr,SLaandar and Thor affair. I said it does my head in and I gave my opinions and it gives me a head ache that it continued aslong as it did.
Thor-null
Slaandar-null-town
and
Abr-scum
Which i said in the begging of this mess.
The only thing that has changed that I haven't mentioned is Thor's gone from null to town and that only happened in the last couple of posts which is after your question. You may of actually got most of these facts if you actually read what I was saying instead of being lazy.