Mini 404: Diablo Mafia (Game Over)

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Unvote, Vote: The Central Scrutinizer

for paralyzingly bad logic. Why are we running Diablo (may He live forever) up the flagpole, please?

Point it out for me, please.

[Save The Dragons]

ASWEIOJFewajifonwoufe

Why?

Why?

Why?

No.

Stop bandwagoning C_D.

Vote: DragonsofSummer

post 105 sets me off. I don't think it's sincere.

[DragonsofSummer]

ASWEIOJFewajifonwoufe

Why?

Why?

Why?

No.

Stop bandwagoning C_D.

Vote: DragonsofSummer

post 105 sets me off. I don't think it's sincere.

What about it makes you think it isn't sincere? I do mean everything I said in that statement, but I'm curious what makes you think I didn't.

[Zindaras]

Official Voting Update

:

chaotic_diablo

: 5 (livingod, The Central Scrutinizer, Cogito Ergo Sum, TheJiveMachine, KaleiÐoscøpe)

DragonsofSummer

: 1 (Save the Dragons)

Frustian

: 1 (remussaidow)

livingod

: 1 (chaotic_diablo)

Pata

: 1 (DragonsofSummer)

The Central Scrutinizer

: 1 (Mr. Flay)

Not Voting

: 2 (Pata, Frustian)

With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch.

[Mr. Flay]

Unvote, Vote: The Central Scrutinizer

for paralyzingly bad logic. Why are we running Diablo (may He live forever) up the flagpole, please?

Point it out for me, please.

Let's see:

Page two and no lynch yet? What are you guys, cautious or something?

Cool, so there's one confirmed town.

I don't like the C_D wagon.

unvote, vote: the central scrutinizer

oh, I meant to pose that as a question- were you joking, scrutinizer, or were you actually advocating a page 2 lynch? If yes, how do you feel about the thread progressing to page three without a lynch?

I feel terrible about it. Discussion is bad for the town.

vote: chaotic_diablo

I'm keeping my vote on C_D because it's what Fritzler would do. That way, if I'm wrong, I can blame Fritzler.

I'm warning you guys already, if this C_D bandwagon goes too far, I'm hopping off... it's way, way too early to be considering a lynch today.

Lobbying for a speedlynch, declaring someone to be confirmed town, self-voting, arguing against discussion, voting for someone you don't think is scum, appeal to authority, and threatening to jump off that vote if it actually goes anywhere - shall I go on? And that's nearly 100% of your posts, except for the ones where you try to deflect criticism by saying "it's my posting style". If it is, it's a scummy one, and I advise you to change it. I'd vote for Fritzler or IS for the same crap too.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

My first posts were to generate discussion. I despise lackadaisical games. They make scum harder to track. My last post was my most serious. I'm voting C_D because no one else is worth voting for at the moment. That being said, there needs to be far more discussion before we even

consider

a lynch. Therefore, should someone put C_D at -1, I'm off the wagon. Pretty simple, really. I certainly don't see any bad logic.

[livingod]

[quote="Zindaras"]

chaotic_diablo

: 4 (livingod, The Central Scrutinizer, Cogito Ergo Sum, TheJiveMachine, KaleiÐoscøpe)[/quote]

I believe that's 5.

[Save The Dragons]

D) Proven by who? You?

This statement really bothers me. It almost seems to me like even if C_D has proven his point, which I like his evidence more than yours right now, you won't care specifically because it is him.

FoS:TheJiveMachine

Doesn't seem very town oriented to me.

it seems like there's many things that could be discussed, yet you pick this one thing and go after it like pitbull. Then you fos, to make it look not so serious. I am quite suspicious of certian FOSs. Scum can be like, "look, I was suspicious of this person back on d1."

Although the major thing is that you failed to unvote your random vote to FOS someone. Why would you find your random vote more useful than a vote on someone who doesn't seem very town oriented.

Oh! I get it! Are you guys scumbuddies?

I found scum for you people. Please get off your "diablo is diablo because his name is diablo" wagon.

[DragonsofSummer]

D) Proven by who? You?

This statement really bothers me. It almost seems to me like even if C_D has proven his point, which I like his evidence more than yours right now, you won't care specifically because it is him.

FoS:TheJiveMachine

Doesn't seem very town oriented to me.

it seems like there's many things that could be discussed, yet you pick this one thing and go after it like pitbull. Then you fos, to make it look not so serious. I am quite suspicious of certian FOSs. Scum can be like, "look, I was suspicious of this person back on d1."

Although the major thing is that you failed to unvote your random vote to FOS someone. Why would you find your random vote more useful than a vote on someone who doesn't seem very town oriented.

Oh! I get it! Are you guys scumbuddies?

I found scum for you people. Please get off your "diablo is diablo because his name is diablo" wagon.

I only put an FoS on him at that point because I was wanting TheJiveMachine to respond with his reasons for what he said, but he has not and now that you bring it up again. I will go ahead and

Unvote, Vote:TheJiveMachine

you may be right that I was stupid to just leave my vote on my random vote, but I wasn't really thinking about it at the time of the post. Thank you for bringing it back to my attention. I do understand your vote on me, and can accept that what I did looks scummy, but it was not intended that way.

[TheJiveMachine]

Wasn't intended to look scummy? Would have never guessed :p

Anyways, I didn't feel the need to respond since livin had basically said what I was thinking: I don't think C_D proved his point, and saying he did when I hadn't seen anyone agree with him and I certainly didn't seemed absurd.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

D) Proven by who? You?

This statement really bothers me. It almost seems to me like even if C_D has proven his point, which I like his evidence more than yours right now, you won't care specifically because it is him.

FoS:TheJiveMachine

Doesn't seem very town oriented to me.

it seems like there's many things that could be discussed, yet you pick this one thing and go after it like pitbull. Then you fos, to make it look not so serious. I am quite suspicious of certian FOSs. Scum can be like, "look, I was suspicious of this person back on d1."

Although the major thing is that you failed to unvote your random vote to FOS someone. Why would you find your random vote more useful than a vote on someone who doesn't seem very town oriented.

Oh! I get it! Are you guys scumbuddies?

I found scum for you people. Please get off your "diablo is diablo because his name is diablo" wagon.

Looks like a worthy wagon to me.

unvote, vote: Dragonsofsummer

[DragonsofSummer]

Wasn't intended to look scummy? Would have never guessed :p

Anyways, I didn't feel the need to respond since livin had basically said what I was thinking: I don't think C_D proved his point, and

saying he did when I hadn't seen anyone agree with him and I certainly didn't seemed absurd.

You will have to notice that I didn't say he had proved his point. My point was that I liked Chaotic Diablo's evidence more at that point, and that the way you said it seemed like you wouldn't care if he had proved it. That looked extremely scummy to me.

[remussaidow]

I have to agree with DoS, C_D is claiming he proved his point when it doesn't seem like anyone agrees with him.

[TheJiveMachine]

Wasn't intended to look scummy? Would have never guessed :p

Anyways, I didn't feel the need to respond since livin had basically said what I was thinking: I don't think C_D proved his point, and

saying he did when I hadn't seen anyone agree with him and I certainly didn't seemed absurd.

You will have to notice that I didn't say he had proved his point. My point was that I liked Chaotic Diablo's evidence more at that point, and that the way you said it seemed like you wouldn't care if he had proved it. That looked extremely scummy to me.

If he had proved it, I would have conceded that he was right. But from my point of view, he didn't come close. I wasn't saying it wouldn't have mattered if he did prove it, I was saying it was incredibly arrogant of him to say he proved a point when he was apparently the only person who thought so.

[DragonsofSummer]

Wasn't intended to look scummy? Would have never guessed :p

Anyways, I didn't feel the need to respond since livin had basically said what I was thinking: I don't think C_D proved his point, and

saying he did when I hadn't seen anyone agree with him and I certainly didn't seemed absurd.

You will have to notice that I didn't say he had proved his point. My point was that I liked Chaotic Diablo's evidence more at that point, and that the way you said it seemed like you wouldn't care if he had proved it. That looked extremely scummy to me.

If he had proved it, I would have conceded that he was right. But from my point of view, he didn't come close. I wasn't saying it wouldn't have mattered if he did prove it, I was saying it was incredibly arrogant of him to say he proved a point when he was apparently the only person who thought so.

Alright, it was just that since you worded it [quote="TheJiveMachine"Proven by who? You?[/quote] It seemed like you didn't care whether he had actually proven the point or not. (Which you are right he didn't).

[DragonsofSummer]

EBWOP:

Proven by who? You?

[livingod]

Despite the fact that he's been voting the devil, TCS has done some votehopping. IGMEOY...

[Mr. Flay]

You (&^*$*&#$ DO realize that in this game, Diablo is on the side of the Town, right? Read the first post... I'm going to remember that for everyone who lives to the endgame. *shakes head at those not reading their themes*

[chaotic_diablo]

Anyways, I didn't feel the need to respond since livin had basically said what I was thinking: I don't think C_D proved his point, and saying he did when I hadn't seen anyone agree with him and I certainly didn't seemed absurd.

I don't see anyone agreeing with you either. Who agreed with your point?

There's a difference between commenting, FoSing, and voting. A lack of willingness to vote anyone is saying that you don't want anyone to think you have strong convictions about anyone, and I agree it's a very defensive move.

I don't see anyone hopping on me because of my self-vote. I see them hopping on because they just want a scapegoat. In reality they are just avoiding the conversation.

If he had proved it, I would have conceded that he was right. But from my point of view, he didn't come close. I wasn't saying it wouldn't have mattered if he did prove it, I was saying it was incredibly arrogant of him to say he proved a point when he was apparently the only person who thought so.

When did you become the most valued of opinions? If I'm right, then that means you approve of it? Your opinion has the same worth as mine so why are you "judging"?
I can approve of my own actions if I think they're correct. If you believe I'm wrong, then why don't you prove it? Is it arrogant to say that "you" have proven a point if you are correct? Why are you automatically assuming that you're right? Is that arrogance as well?

I have to agree with DoS, C_D is claiming he proved his point when it doesn't seem like anyone agrees with him.

Who are these "anyone" you are talking about? Are they disagreeing with me?

Despite the fact that he's been voting the devil, TCS has done some votehopping. IGMEOY...

I'm going to have to ask you to stop calling me the devil. It was fun the first few times, but now it has lost its charm.

[remussaidow]

Lucifer, there is a very slight difference between someone not agreeing with you- those not commenting on it- and disagreeing with you- those arguing against you.



Couldn't help the Lucifer bit, sorry.

[chaotic_diablo]

Lucifer, there is a very slight difference between someone not agreeing with you- those not commenting on it-

Why are you putting words in people's mouths?

and disagreeing with you- those arguing against you.

please explain this difference. I literally translated your post into "Everyone is against you".

Couldn't help the Lucifer bit, sorry.

O well.

[remussaidow]

I did explain the difference. Read post 144 again. I explained it as I stated it.

[chaotic_diablo]

I did explain the difference. Read post 144 again. I explained it as I stated it.

I don't see a clear difference between "not agreeing" and "disagreeing". Assuming that they are just labels for particular people, it's incorrect to put words in their mouths and assume that it is the opinion that they

must

have. As for those who "disagree" with me, they haven't exactly won support over the "not agreeing".

[remussaidow]

Let see. You didn't get it the first time SO. Not agreeing with you. That means that they are not arguing for or against you.

Disagreeing with you. That means that they are actively against you.

These are not labels for specific people. Not at all, actually.

[Mr. Flay]

Grahr, where is everybody? Why is no one discussing anything but the spurious bandwagon on c_d?