Kenji wrote:
Pablito re post 99:
Nice scaremongering... "Quick people, make rushed descisions! It's your only hope!"
Yes I am. And Yes I stand by that post and whatever interpretation you choose to put on it. The game created that scare, I'm just pointing it out in case people don't realize it yet. Call it exaggerating the mechanics of the game if you will, but it is something. I think that we won't realize how important it is until the first deadline falls.
I do agree with Kenji's assessment of patrick in 84 though. I mean, to borrow omg's earlier argument against Jack, I just don't get how Patrick could defend me so early at that point. I mean, yeah, Patrick and I have a history, but it was a bit premature to pull out the card that Patrick did. It's like he went off chasing the boyband along with the redheads. Nonetheless, Patrick does look very pro-town aside from that. But 84 did perk my ears when I initially saw it.
I agree with omg's assessment on scotmany. I did think it was a pro-town tell on him.
However, I cannot agree with omg's vote to Adele. It just seems that omg is doing a lot of work to ensure that he protects someone whose 'recent post just rings true". At the point when omg switched votes to riverwind to Adele, there was a three way tie between Adele, Ecto and riverwind. If I'm right, then if the deadline were to fall at that point, then the mod would randomly choose betwen the three. There would've been only a 1/3 chance of Ecto being chosen. Furthermore, there would been a 1/3 chance of omg getting his #1 suspect lynched and a 1/3 chance of his #3 suspect lynched. I did not see the benefit of moving the vote. But maybe I'm biased because I still don't see what you guys are seeing in Ecto's post. Therefore
FOS: omg
for that stuff. Plus I don't know if I can just chalk up omg's behavior up to difference of personality and playstyle anymore. That survivor stuff is really alarming. And while it probably is personality, it could be a great mask for future behavior if he really is scum. I would definitely want to look at omg later if he's been vote-switching to protect a partner of his.
I mean, it was a nice post and all, but it's not really addressing any of my or anybody's for that matter argument against him. It was more of a "kick his toes in the dirt, woe is me, take pity on me" type of message. I don't see Ecto directly addressing the inconsistencies that Jack put out. Maybe you guys are reading something else, and I'm not. Maybe I'm alone in that, but I still doubt Ecto. I think Adele's probably scummier at the moment, but I doubt Ecto.
Sup, later.