L-4 with no wagon even close to ours in size, and you think that we would be sweating?In post 1123, PeregrineV wrote:@Underarchers- You are at 7 votes. I wouldn't sweat it too much.
My, my, whyever would we be doing that?
L-4 with no wagon even close to ours in size, and you think that we would be sweating?In post 1123, PeregrineV wrote:@Underarchers- You are at 7 votes. I wouldn't sweat it too much.
Meh, maybe when analyzing in greater detail, I can make a better call, butyeah, these DO look pretty similar to my eyes atm. Then again, I can't actually see these very well 'til I hit submit, making side-by-side quite difficult.In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4673154#p4673154]post 552[/url], I Am Innocent wrote:Lol at mollie for giving moz a town read in 327.
@mollie, re 333 "moziperson is obvconftown and has no idea how to act. also wagon speed. and look who was on it" how was moz acting, and who on the wagon are you referring too? (I see in 335 u list penguin and hero as scum, yet hero has not voted for mozi....so one scummy person on the wagon makes you think mozi is town?) Also, just noticed the speed of the wagon is 4 votes at this time, lol...
Noting Moz's same questions to mollie in 385. Not sure what this means yet.
Followed by a terrible vote in 387 by moz for penguin
Majiffy and Hero's followup posts to maz are right along with my thinking. town points
@Moz, what specifically about PV's and Rob's case on penguin looked good to you?
@Vifam, what about moz's 399 did you specifically like?
If Moz flips scum, I would look at mollie (see above) and vifam (see 471 & 472).
@mollie, you say you like moz's questioning of your read, but that was AFTER you gave him a conftown read. What happened before that which made you give him that read. Also, you say ""act" as in behave not pretend." Does that mean that moz needs to behave, and not pretend, since earlier you said moz "has no idea how to act"
@moz's post 540, there is an ongoing game that I (and majiffy and PV and AJtheE) cannot talk about, but let's just say it would make sense if someone had fake vigged a claim in there which outted a real town vig in that one...all hypothetical of course. In other words, I could see why AJ would be concerned.
People I wouldn't mind seeing lynched today: Mollie, Moz, Om, Lord, Jacob, probably in that order
unvote Jacob
vote pirate mollie
In post 573, Aj The Epic wrote:IAI's and Hero's same read on Mollie means that a read on them should be the same?
In post 1054, pirate mollie wrote:
Lord Mhork - unsure, could go either way. I liked his wot. and his observations of hero cos that is where my thoughts have been too. only thing I didn't like was his assumption that 1 of us has got to be scum. where do you people come up with these retarded theories, lol.
In post 1068, Nero Cain wrote:Also, Mhork had 9 lynch candidates for today. Why am I suspicious but he is not?
In post 1139, I Am Innocent wrote:@Matt, please explain in 804 "IAI has been doing similar things to Mhork, with added on [crap]" Please explain the added on crap, as well as the similar things.
[BULLSHIT]
Matt's play on page 41 is just getting bad. Well there is potential like 1012, but he never follows up on this stuff.
Page 42 and Matt is now talking meta. Weren't you the one dismissing that earlier in the game?
[BULLSHIT]
Interesting that Matt includes Jacob on his 1095 scum list. Let's test that theory:
unvote Mollie
vote Jacob
Thoughts on the Matt push for IAI wagon:
Matt is right, my wagon not growing is a bit shady. Knowing my alignment, I know that something else is up. My guess is that the Bankable hrs is something scum are trying to whittle away as quick as possible.
[BULLSHIT]
In post 1142, MattP wrote:I'd bet JS is town after that stupid-ass vote.
Moz, underachievers, and IAI FTW for right now
In post 1138, Lord Mhork wrote:I don't like you, but I think it's just a general personality conflict.
More to the point, you should go back and read what I said. I didn't say that one of you had to be scum. I said if one of you were scum, the other was more or less confirmed town. Do you disagree with that?
In post 1145, pirate mollie wrote:In post 1138, Lord Mhork wrote:I don't like you, but I think it's just a general personality conflict.
hhhmmmm....
More to the point, you should go back and read what I said. I didn't say that one of you had to be scum. I said if one of you were scum, the other was more or less confirmed town. Do you disagree with that?
well since I know my own alignment and if hero flips scum then no, I don't
but if I flip town it does not mean that hero is scum although he has moved to unsure cos he has ceased interaction after a town read. what do you think of that.