In post 592, Boating Police wrote: In post 578, Herobrine wrote:
Point out specifically what you think is unfair or manipulative in that case. I used mollie's established scum meta that I'm aware of in conjunction with her forced read on moz and subsequent inability to provide any explanation for her read to paint her as scum, yes. That's because it WAS scummy.
Your case requires THREE leaps. The first is that PM is scum. The second is that PM would follow that same meta she previously followed. The THIRD is that her read on mozamis is fabricated and therefore that's the scum. The fact that you're trying to manipulate everything to try to point to something like that is ridiculous. Start with calling them scum independently. Relational tells shouldn't involve the extra dose of meta tells or they became hilariously unindicative of anything.
1. My case does not require the leap that Mollie is scum. This is the conclusion. I'm basing this on mostly meta.
2. This is arguable, but I think this is an assumption that you rely on whenever you use meta. I consider meta to be largely valid. I consider it especially valid in this case where she said "never do THIS as scum"
3. Her read on mozamis sounds forced and fabricated. Going along with her meta, I believe it is likely mozamis is the scum. He's also rather scummy in his own right, but I didn't recap all the stuff that people have said about him over the many many many pages of this game. There was no reason to.
I would normally agree with you about relational tells, but because of how recent and specific the case of this meta was, I considered it relevant. This is a rather unique case of meta because she specifically told me she does this at scum and it's incredibly recent, so I don't think it fair to treat it like your average vague meta stuff. It's not the same by a longshot.
And mollie, you can argue over how relevant that scum QT was, but the fact that I think it was relevant makes it relevant in my opinion. I did not mean to purposefully upset you, but I'm also not going to hold back on my understanding of your meta because I could hurt your feelings. Frankly, I'm skeptical that you could be this upset about me linking to a scum QT, considering that the site meta is releasing all scum QTs into the public domain at the end of every game. Do you come from a website where this is not the norm?
~Rob
