Mini 1404 - Monopoly Mafia - Game Over

Jal · Post Post #1225 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:14 pm

Although, I think his cards somehow relate to my cards which makes me wonder why he would visit me with those cards.

SafetyDance · Post Post #1226 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:16 pm

Only visitor I got in my message

SafetyDance · Post Post #1227 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:17 pm

Also it would take balls of WIFOM to admit to visiting UN without the knowledge that I knew he visited you as well.

Jal · Post Post #1228 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:20 pm

Thing is, as scum he could have easily visited two people. I can visit multiple people. Heck, right now I have a killing role and some other crap which I can conduct all my shitniz on the side with. He could technically not be lying.

SafetyDance · Post Post #1229 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:23 pm

Exactly, balls of wifom for scum to admit that.

But he backed up my result when he didn't have to and he mentioned he visited you when he didn't have to. It would be far simpler for scum to not say anything.

Because I don't doubt for a second there's lurking scum here holding up their cards and enjoying the conversation whilst working how has what etc

TehBrawlGuy · Post Post #1230 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:53 pm

I'll claim the last card so we can get it out of the way, but I think telling Scum who is most likely to have lots of powers is probably a bad idea, and we shouldn't claim getting cards after today.

TehBrawlGuy · Post Post #1231 (ISO) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 6:54 pm

Holy cow, the grammar in that is awful. Man, I miss being able to edit.

guille2015 · Post Post #1232 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:06 am

In post 1163, SafetyDance wrote:Oh yeah because if anyone else had the EC they would have kept it quiet? #980 was days ago, even the lurkers have read it by now, I would be getting rope burn around my neck right about now if there was another counter claim. This is funny too, anyone could claim they got the railway card, your claim of getting Lurker's card AFTER my claim of getting one of them, actually backs up my claim. You realise you could be counter-claimed too?

No no. If Lurker had two cards upon death, and more than three players received cards upon his death. Then one of them is lying.

I originally had a scum read on you, actually your slot, you are doing quite good. So, I am trying to reconcile how Lurker messed up his card in 307 (was it?). It's possible that he misread his own card. But maybe the card wasn't his in the first place. I am just making sure that you have indeed gotten the card from lurker. Since nobody other than you and me claim this, then I can infer that Lurker did have that card and that you did receive it.

One of the things that promoted me to think this way is that Waterworks is also a one shot tracker, Right cheery? Personally, I would have designed watcher and tracker into them, but I am no GNR.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1233 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:11 am

But given the 2 purples are watcher cards, it's possible that the 2 utility cards have the same ability.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1234 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:13 am

mod, prod on xis please

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1235 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:16 am

mod, are cards redistributed at night or to start the day or can it be both?

Cheery Dog · Post Post #1236 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:17 am

In post 1232, guille2015 wrote:One of the things that promoted me to think this way is that Waterworks is also a one shot tracker, Right cheery?

I haven't mentioned the limitations on my actions, nor do I plan to. Need to keep scum guessing at some things to do with my cards.

In post 1233, Jake from State Farm wrote:But given the 2 purples are watcher cards, it's possible that the 2 utility cards have the same ability.

Someone claimed Baltic?

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1237 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 2:21 am

If people would read between the lines it's quite obvious who has Baltic.

Btw, I think Jal is our SK and he probably killed un.

guille2015 · Post Post #1238 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:16 am

In post 1209, SafetyDance wrote:
@Mod: Ok, what version of Monopoloy are we playing?

I'm seeing google images that are purple but all the wiki layouts are brown.

Monopoly switched the Baltic/Mediterranean properties from Purple to brown. I used to own a board with them Purple, but current boards have them as brown.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1239 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:19 am

Guile, why in your mind does SC and I have to be different alliance? I don't think you ever explained your reasoning behind this

guille2015 · Post Post #1240 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:01 am

In post 1239, Jake from State Farm wrote:Guile, why in your mind does SC and I have to be different alliance? I don't think you ever explained your reasoning behind this

Well, first part is that you cannot be both scum due to 1) your conversation on day one seems genuine and 2) SC/Cheery is town.

Second you found something suspicious on SC. You go after him saying you'll explain later. Then you say its gut, but you want him lynch. Take note that SC wants Lurker lynch at this time. You do give the posts that gave you your gut read, much much much later.

And you still seem to be suspicious about Cheery when he was been one of the most pro town players in the game.

But you are right, this is not enough to link you as opposite. Enough for me to be suspicious of you though.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1241 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:03 am

You know for a fact SC is town? That's an interesting development

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1242 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:05 am

Besides I did essentially explain my suspicious, just not all in 1 post

guille2015 · Post Post #1243 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:26 am

In post 1241, Jake from State Farm wrote:You
know for a fact
SC is town? That's an interesting development

Misrep anyone?

In post 1242, Jake from State Farm wrote:Besides I did essentially explain my suspicious, just not all in 1 post

This is true. but your explanation was unsatisfactory. Yeah, your suspicion revolves on SC being a careful reader when he missed something early in the game. However, this is not indicative of any alignment. You don't even go through meta to back it up.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1244 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:38 am

How did I misrep you? You said he's town did u not?

Gut reads are never satisfactory to anyone, but they are what I rely on

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1245 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:39 am

And I didn't have to go through meta, SC admitted himself he's normally not careless.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1246 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:44 am

In post 1126, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 1123, MonkeyMan576 wrote:It's not the antagonistic part that is so scummy. It's that you played completely different in the first half of the day and the second half of the day. Mehndi provided a lot more analysis and content than you did, and you also attacked SC, who ended up being right about Lurker. So I look at multiple things when making my reads.

Explain how I've played differently

Still waiting

guille2015 · Post Post #1247 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:55 am

In post 1244, Jake from State Farm wrote:How did I misrep you? You said he's town did u not?

No, you said, that I said as a fact that cheery is town. It's typical for probably everyone in this site, that when they are confident in someone as town they will state "This person is town" with out it actually meaning that they know this as a fact.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1248 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:12 am

The thing is your flip on him makes no sense. You had him as scummy and your reason why he became town is sort of weak. Someone, maybe you claimed SC became town because sc was right about lurker but that wasn't true either.

The only pause I have is cd visited Jal and didn't die. This is factual info
But it doesn't make him town. Sadly nobody is confirmed town. I'm betting there is atleast 1 scum in these PR claims.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #1249 (ISO) » Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:22 am

As for the "typical" thing with this site. If you think a player is town for whatever reason, you say you think. If you say a player is town that means you know. As long as this appears on the wiki as a scumtell, it's going to always be brought up.

In the future say you think when it's your opinion, say you know or that they are when it's role related or a scum slip.