In post 1124, Jal wrote:Monkey, what is your definition of role madness?
If there are more power roles than normal and few vanilla townies. In this game, I would say it is role madness if there are 1 or 0 vanilla townies and no mafia goons.
In post 1124, Jal wrote:Monkey, what is your definition of role madness?
In post 1123, MonkeyMan576 wrote:It's not the antagonistic part that is so scummy. It's that you played completely different in the first half of the day and the second half of the day. Mehndi provided a lot more analysis and content than you did, and you also attacked SC, who ended up being right about Lurker. So I look at multiple things when making my reads.
In post 1101, SafetyDance wrote:In post 895, Mehdi2277 wrote:And that same scum miller got nominated for a scummy. Kind of means something and if you want an opinion of a non townie who read the game I commented and said sala played pretty great. Policy lynching millers is a bad idea if you don't care much about their play.
I'll check the cards I got later, but I've gotten 2 already (one was at night and the other I mentioned during the day before).
Where did gnr mention the kills like that in the OP?
I think this needs to be clarified. How'd you get a card at night? Lurker's two cards have been claimed.
In post 1098, Lord Mhork wrote:
TBG, do you really think that the mod would let a Vig possibly be scum. I'd wager that killing would be a passive ability for a townie or possibly serial killer. Scum Vig just seems way too powerful.
In post 1105, Jal wrote:
This is what I find strange: StrangeCougar's reaction to Lurker. Lurker claimed what his cards were and one was similar to the one Cheery is claiming now. Why would StrangeCougar find Lurker's claim strange when he had a similar card indicating that yes, those deeds have power? It's not like Lurker claimed TRACKER which is what Cheery says he has, so it wasn't a CC type of vote - so I'm having trouble finding the town motivation in finding Lurker's claim "off."
In post 1128, Jal wrote:A vig can be a negative utility role. As scum, I would rather kill a tracker than a vig. If there is a roleblocker, which is the best explanation of town-you not being seen tracked, then they would be best off blocking them, no?
In post 1139, Jake from State Farm wrote:the problem I have with all of this is the fact that Safety claimed he got his tracker ability from the card he got from lurker, lurker already claimed it was a watcher and later switched and said it was a tracker, the fact that now SD is claiming he got that same card and in deed it has a tracker ability, I am not buying it for a second.
I believe CD that he visited jal, I find it hard to believe a mod would let a person perform 2 actions but I have to assume he's telling the truth about visiting CD. 2 tracker claims plus my role doesn't make sense as all being town sided so if I had to guess I'd say SD is scum over CD
the only problem I have is I don't trust mehndi one bit, so I am down with lynching him, but if he flips town I think it pretty much confirms SD as scum.
SO i'd rather lynch SD first because I don't buy 2 tracker claims but if I can't get an SD lynch, I will gladly take a mehndi lynch.
As for Monkey, I have no clue what to make of him, my gut wants to say he is scum but I will give him a chance to see if he can communicate his reads better and also see how he explains the question I asked him.
p.edit - this mock lynch is the stupidest thing I ever heard
In post 1143, Jake from State Farm wrote:what are you referring to about your role PM that CD backed up, I don't recall seeing this, can you link me to what you are talking about.
In post 1145, Jake from State Farm wrote:actually let me do this
request replacement
I'm having surgery tomorrow and from what everyone has told me I will be in a world of pain for at least a week, I definitely won't be interested in playing mafia.
sorry everyone