Which two people do you have in mind?
Mini #381-Werewolf: Cancelled
-
-
Atticus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: January 8, 2006
- Location: MO, USA
-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
-
-
Atticus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: January 8, 2006
- Location: MO, USA
-
-
trabony Townie
-
-
Echo419 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: June 3, 2006
- Location: Finding Nemo
GC: Lowell vs. Stalling.
I think, in retrospect, that Stalling is overall more suspicious than Lowell. Lowell could be an overeager townie, but I can't find a good explanation for SC's actions.
But I'd like a vote count before I vote.Showyeah, they're totally buying it.
oops, wrong window.
"Whoops, was that hammer?"- Pretty much everyone, at some point.-
-
conflux Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 56
- Joined: August 12, 2006
-
-
conflux
-
-
Rathyr Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 888
- Joined: May 17, 2006
- Location: USA
-
-
trabony Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: August 25, 2006
-
-
Echo419 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: June 3, 2006
- Location: Finding Nemo
What are you talking about? Did you not find Lowells's "plans" suspicious? They appeared to be an attempt to set up power roles for a kill. Then there was the 5th vote on SC from him. He isn't as scummy as SC, but he isn't pure as driven snow either.
I've decided not to vote yet. We need more discussion out of this day. I also think the SC bandwagon is a bit too convenient, the way it was the second one that appeared and how it piled up so fast.Showyeah, they're totally buying it.
oops, wrong window.
"Whoops, was that hammer?"- Pretty much everyone, at some point.-
-
trabony Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: August 25, 2006
-
-
CoolBot Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: February 24, 2003
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
-
-
CoolBot Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: February 24, 2003
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Where did I say that you were insinuating that voting SC was proof of innocence? You said that voting SC wasn't scummy, and I was saying that, regardless, scum do vote for each other. Therefore, while simply voting for SC in and of itself might not be a "scummish" action, that doesn't mean that we should not scruitinize those that have voted for SC.
What it does appear that you were saying, is that because SC did something incredibly scummish/stupid, vote placement is of no consequence. I disagree, as scum vote for each other, but - let's smother this more with WIFOM - undoubtedly they do so only in relation to the general sentiments of town figures.
For example, if SC turns up scum, I wouldn't be surprised in the least if one of the people who voted/are voting him is his buddy. With that said,Vote: Stalling. At this point I'm curious to find out his alignment."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Jack Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5460
- Joined: August 13, 2006
bah, I don't see that at all. You seem in an awful hurry to get this day over.CoolBot wrote:Where did I say voting SC was proof of innocence. All I said was that a vote was not scummy by itself. And there is no point to delaying the lynch, since scum will be laying low by now, waiting for the inevitable to happen. SC's stunt basically ended any usefulness to be had from this day.
Why isn't there any usefulness to be had?-
-
trabony Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: August 25, 2006
To anyone who hasn't seen the game in a long time:
-Stalling said Coolbot and Jack COULD be human
-Stalling claimed scum
-Atticus voted Stalling and FOSed Coolbot and Jack since Stalling seemed to be on their side
-Stalling FOSes Coolbot and Jack (wtf!!!)
-Stalling says he claimed scum to start a discuission (wtf!!!)
My theory is that Stalling is Slaking's "brother" because when I looked at slaking's previous game he was never this stupid.-
-
Echo419 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 215
- Joined: June 3, 2006
- Location: Finding Nemo
Oops. I got confused. I thought Lowell's 5th vote on SC wasbeforeSC did his little claim. That's why I was seeing Lowell as more suspicious for a little bit.
Guys, SC has 5 votes. Are we willing to end the day now? If so, I'll go ahead and hammer.Showyeah, they're totally buying it.
oops, wrong window.
"Whoops, was that hammer?"- Pretty much everyone, at some point.-
-
Atticus Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: January 8, 2006
- Location: MO, USA
How you ask? It's elementary, my dear!Green Crayons wrote: ...
Atticus: ..How did that put "scum" in bright neon lights above his head? I just don't see it.
Anywaaaays...
He has something to hide, what has a townie to hide? PERIOD"There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at without result." - Winston Churchill-
-
Elias_the_thief He/HimNot Statistically SignificantHe/Him
- Not Statistically Significant
- Not Statistically Significant
- Posts: 3194
- Joined: August 15, 2006
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Maryland.
If you want to. As I see it, Stalling would not be continuing to play the game if he seriously meant his claim. What's the point? If he was seriously claiming scum he would have done it and not appeared in the game again. I could see him trying to defend himself if his brother did it, but thats not what he said. I seriously don't think it's the right move, but it's not my decision really. I'll keep holding my vote.I play the games rul gud.-
-
CoolBot Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: February 24, 2003
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
-
-
StallingChamp Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 531
- Joined: September 29, 2006
I already explained why I FoSed Cool and Jack, I FoSedtrabony wrote:To anyone who hasn't seen the game in a long time:
-Stalling said Coolbot and Jack COULD be human
-Stalling claimed scum
-Atticus voted Stalling and FOSed Coolbot and Jack since Stalling seemed to be on their side
-Stalling FOSes Coolbot and Jack (wtf!!!)
-Stalling says he claimed scum to start a discuission (wtf!!!)
My theory is that Stalling is Slaking's "brother" because when I looked at slaking's previous game he was never this stupid.EVERYONEwho voted me for the "claim".
Also, I have posted under s_m that I am indeed the same person.
Finally, please stop bringing up s_m when considering to lynch me. There are zero similarities between the 2. I challenged people to name a similarity and the only one listed is "you claimed scum and you were". Again, assuming I did that, it wasnt a claim, it was a game-ending post.Show[color=red][b][i]GO SENS GO[/b][/i][/color]
[url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5295]Mini 441[/url] - Night 2
High School Mafia coming soon to a Mini Theme Queue near you!-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
I agree - that's why I find people who are voting you for that reason to be suspicious, it's like they're fishing for reasons to vote you, which is more condemming depending upon your alignment.StallingChamp wrote:Finally, please stop bringing up s_m when considering to lynch me. There are zero similarities between the 2.
Which is why someone should just finish this day and get it over with.-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
Eh, it's late and I didn't preview my post. Reworded to properly get my ideas across:
I agree - that's why I find people who are voting you solely for that reason to be suspicious. This, of course, does not exempt you personally from suspicion, but when people appear to be fishing for votes when they have perfectly good in-game reasons, it just seems a bit weird. Of course, the suspicion that I'll attribute to this stretching of logic to vote you will really depend on your alignment. Therefore, I want to see you done away with already (for previous suspicions as well as the one just mentioned).
This is why someone should just finish this day and get it over with."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-