In post 197, Baby Spice wrote:In post 183, Jake from State Farm wrote: lurker or Lord, lurker is the scummier of the 2
Care to elaborate as to why?
Gut
In post 197, Baby Spice wrote:In post 183, Jake from State Farm wrote: lurker or Lord, lurker is the scummier of the 2
Care to elaborate as to why?
In post 160, Lurker wrote:In post 68, Mogadishu Jones wrote:Holy crap somehow I missed posts 43-46.
I'm down for thisunvote: vote lurker
@lurker: regarding post #44, why did you feel the need to announce you weren't moving your vote?
To let them know that at the same time I wasn't lurking and would move my vote eventually.
In post 165, Lurker wrote:In post 161, Mogadishu Jones wrote:Before I expound on why that is silly and I think requires further scrutiny, one more question.
Why did it take you so long to answer the question?
Because It did not seem like a pressing issue, considering it was RVS anyway.
In post 199, Baby Spice wrote:Pls, quotes and using names and not just personal pronouns adds context which is fabulous, but please trim the quote to relevence. Walls of quoted text for a single line response is not good.
In post 200, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 197, Baby Spice wrote:In post 183, Jake from State Farm wrote: lurker or Lord, lurker is the scummier of the 2
Care to elaborate as to why?
Gut
In post 219, Mehdi2277 wrote:Read wise? It helps since you actually are showing a good amount of thought in reads and makes me think you're more likely town. Agreement wise I still think they both show similar mindsets of someone trying to explain they'll help later when it really doesn't help besides show they aren't lurking.