In post 1836, Nachomamma8 wrote:You don't see petapan's connection to Rach when she was being lynched and he said "no, let's lynch someone in a dream?". Because that sort of points to peta utilizing that rach never appeared in a dream to keep a weak scum partner with a power role alive. His question to you reinforces that. Then there's using two dead scumbuddies to clear a third, which is pretty fucking sketchy especially since it let him glide with a townread on his partner forever and always.
i don't know i saw it more as not wanting to lynch a pr and he didn't say rach was definitely town from the dead scumbuddies.
plus these felt like rach was buddyingup to peta:
Rach wrote:Thanks for explaining it Peta
The thing is Peta is correct, the wagon has built up fast and even if we are all sure he is scum, we need to give time for others to respond including the lynchee. Day just started.
and i thought it was odd how seastorm rejoined out of the blue to vote KoC.
Nacho wrote:It's fucking terrible.
then help me lynch him. staeg's dream is the only list that jarvis doesn't appear on. Assuming I am correct about jarvis and the dream is accurate, we can clear deas, n, pv, and greygnarl once jarvis is confirmed scum.