so, on that note,
Lowell, however, is being a little ridiculous. Lurking I can handle, but bringing up other games and casting suspiscion due to them? Eh, I'm not amused.
Touche. Yeah all right, I'm here. I've pretty much been ignoring this game, probably because I've been paying too much attention to others.Arafax wrote:When you post and the MOD has to prod you later in that day, you know that your posts are full of waste!Our Awesome MOD wrote: Lowell has been prodded.
I don't think his absence makes the game stagnant at all. In this still early stage of the game there is plenty to be got from people with a little bit of probing. I can only think of one group that would be willing to move toElias_the_thief wrote:good points arafax. in addition to them, i'm willing to move to lynch becuase he's making the game stagnant, by only posting twice. FOS on omg, but for nowunvote, vote: lowell
Indeed, four votes does appear to have done the trick in this instance butPink Princess wrote:Unvotepending contribution.
I think that the four votes turned out to be the perfect amount of pressure to get some participation - apparently it worked. I don't know if I would have necessarily put thefourthvote on, but if it caused Lowell to rejoin us, I'm content.
No, I don't think you will, actually...Elias_the_thief wrote:unvote
anyways, i'd still like to hear more from lowell than an apology for his absense.
That is a scum tell, yes, but it's not hypocrisy. More like flipflopping or inconsistent behaviour.Twomz wrote:If someone starts the day saying they don't think so and so is scummy, then later in the day for no reason at all they start pushing for their lynch, it's typically concidered a scum tell (that's my closest example to hypocricy in mafia games).
He's right...Just read my sig....Speaking of which, where is Colonel Kurtz?...He hasn't posted in 5 RLD's...Lowell wrote: He hates lurkers. No, no, he really hates lurkers. Guys, in case you didn't hear me, ARAFAX HATES LURKERS!
Most racist comment so far in the game.glork wrote:Because the kettle knows that he has a good heart, even though his colour suggests otherwise.
Hypocricy, inconsistency, flip-flopping, kettles of whatever color - it's all a matter of semantics. It's not what word we assign to the actions that matters, it's the actions themselves. By whatever word you use, I find the referenced behaviors suspcious if not scummy.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:That is a scum tell, yes, but it's not hypocrisy. More like flipflopping or inconsistent behaviour.Twomz wrote:If someone starts the day saying they don't think so and so is scummy, then later in the day for no reason at all they start pushing for their lynch, it's typically concidered a scum tell (that's my closest example to hypocricy in mafia games).
PP gave a good example. It's the kettle calling the pot black.
Eh, I guess I only listed two for each. Whatever. I felt like I saw others, but I can't find them now. Still enough for me to be suspicious. Methinks you doth protest too much.Elias_the_thief wrote:you claim i do everything several times but you only site two actual posts for each. please clarify which you mean. anyways. my vote for you in 116 was for the purpose of getting you to talk, which was a reason not stated by arafax. also, where in 131 or 132 do i question my accusers?