Scalebane:
There’s more than 1 way to defend myself. I believe I don’t need to give my reasons regarding CK to convince people I’m not a SK. And considering the only evidence you have against me is the very information that I gave unpromptedly and freely, I’m in no rush to defend myself.Scalebane [156] wrote:<snip>Yes, well, considering that people have been asking for these reasons so that maybe they'll have a reason not to vote you, it might be nice if you quit going "Yes, I do look like an SK, yeah, yeah, but c'mon guys! look at scalebane! look at scalebane! not me!" and start defending yourself.<snip>EmpTyger wrote:I had 3 reasons for targeting CK. I choose not to spell them out explicitly at this time, although I will clarify that my decision was most definitely not random.
Sorry, I’m not implying you’re cheating. I’m considering this from CK’s PoV. I’m assuming it’s more likely he blocked someone on chamber’s lynch: STD, Ixnay (Hammer), Scalebane, CK, olio, Tyger, MeMe. I know he didn’t block me, and he obviously didn’t block himself. Someone he knew irl, whose behavior might have seemed off, maybe? I mean, knowing now what you know, who do you think CK might have targeted?Scalebane [cont] wrote:See, I have a really hard time not being offended by this because you just implied that CK and I were cheating, or at least that he would have a good enough idea of my role because he knew me in real life. Do you not see where he completely fails to say anything about me being suspicious D1? That's because he didn't think I was! You're also basing your logic on the assumptions you want to reach. You just said: "Scalebane is scum. CK could read that very easily and blocked him, which implies that Scalebane is scum." which is just bad logic. *And* CK was on the chamber lynch for most of D1.<snip>EmpTyger wrote:You knew CK irl, which combined with your being on the lynch of the D1 innocent might make you a more likely choice for him to have targeted.
Oh?! Why haven’t *you* nameclaimed, then? Which you were quick to try to toss out as a suggestion to AniX in [67].Scalebane [cont] wrote:It's the last sentence of this that's been nagging at me (bolding mine). I don't see how anyone could read that and not get suspicious. You're claiming that you know what's best for the town, and more information is not it. Well, perhaps revealing more information would be bad for *your* side. But I highly doubt that it could hurt the town.<snip>EmpTyger wrote:I revealed what I did because I thought that it would be help the town. I did not reveal what I did not reveal because I think that it would be hurt the town.
Because half of that information was only known to me and the mafia. Ironically, I wasn’t the first to call you on this: Chess did in [116], well before I came forward.Scalebane [cont] wrote:And as I've said in previous posts, excuse me for trying to use information from the nightkill in figuring out who could be anti-town.
olio:
Of course my rolename would give extra information. If you want a massnameclaim, go for it. I don’t see any reason to offer mine freely. I claimed partially because it provided the town with useful information that was otherwise only known to myself and the mafia. Claiming my name would most likely give as much information to the mafia as it would to the town.olio [154] wrote:<snip>That said, I believe your claim at the moment. I do disagree with you that your rolename wouldn't give any extra information, but at the same time I see the benefit of keeping it disclosed. Latter seems to be better now.<snip>
Ixnay:
Go fish. *I* was the nightkiller, remember?Ixnayonthehombre [162] wrote:<snip>By at this time, do you mean you will tell us later, or not at all? Or that you will only tell us under specific circumstances?I had 3 reasons for targeting CK. I choose not to spell them out explicitly at this time
BTW, what(name) character are you? Did your character know Gretchen in the movie? Like the bully or Donnie or her father? That way we could tell whether or not Nonny's hints help us determine who the nightkiller was.
Rest mostly answered elsewhere, but as for whether I’d ever tell my reasons: While I see no reason to now, circumstances later could certainly change.
Sotty:
Something really bothers me here. You mention olio, MeMe, Chess, STD, and AniX- but don’t have anything to say about the Tyger/Scalebane matter. And the only other post you’ve made since then, [151], was a hedge on me. You’ve been silent on Scalebane, and to me it feels like you’re trying to distance yourself.Sotty7 [173] wrote:With everything we have going on, I'm not to sure about the motives of people pushing the lurker, Anix. I get the slight feeling of them trying to distract away from the current discussion. That said I know Meme hates lurkers and STD could be the same but something about it doesn't really click. Why not just ask for aprod?
I really don't like olio's vote switch. I agree with STD's point about someone sticking their neck out so early in the manner that Chess has points more towards him being town over scum. He has been actively out there looking for scum and jumping on him so quick doesn't sit well with me.
FOS:olio