In post 117, kondi2424 wrote:Norman, what happened to your FOS on greenknight?
Also Kondi, one more thing. Why would you care about my FoS list?
In post 117, kondi2424 wrote:Norman, what happened to your FOS on greenknight?
In post 124, kondi2424 wrote:Alright, then, LM. Who have you seen that is a potential partner?
In post 52, MaguaofIllusion wrote:I submitted my Daykill on you.
Next time Seacore posts you will be flipped.
In post 59, ManiacalLemon wrote:In post 57, Foxace36 wrote:........
Anyways...
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Norman
You seem like the best candidate for a lynch right now?
What say you?
Sheep much? He comes off as more of a noob/troll to me.
norman wrote:As or Magnua, I do believe he might be a scumbag.His refusal to not answer my questions, during night time, is probably an act a scumbag would probably doand then vote me because I randomly make votes depending on first, roster picks and then detection.
norman wrote:Everyone else who didn't post and who is currently voting me right after Mr. Magnua did, I take you to be a scumbag.
In post 68, ManiacalLemon wrote:Norman is most likely a troll.
Riggs isn't defending me... his first and only vote isonme.
I'm listening to Attack! by System of a Down... Troll
In post 79, ManiacalLemon wrote:I'm going to ignore Norman's slot until he's replaced... if he's replaced >.>
In post 81, greenknight wrote:In post 78, Empking wrote:In post 76, Shadow1psc wrote:In post 74, Norman wrote:ManiacalLemon. You've earned yourself my distrust.
FoS: Lemons, MagnuaOfIllusion, Empking, Pine, and greenknight.
Until you 3 can tell me exactly why you're voting me, (exlcuding Lemons because I think he's trying to bluff me and make me think he's not a scumbag) you will remain on my FoS list.
As for Green Knight who recently asked why I'm asking these "random" questions... No these aren't random questions, genius, these are background checks and investigations.
So by the great power of deduction, your scum list and hunting abilities consists of people suspecting you? Is this correct?
What do you deduce from this?
Norman is clearly trolling. Sadly I don't think this behaviour makes him any more likely than the usual random chance to be scum.
Anyway, after reviewing the archive of the old thread,Vote: AurorusVox. I'm suspicious of the amount of buddying/alliance building he seemed to be doing.
In post 86, ManiacalLemon wrote:In post 80, MaguaofIllusion wrote:@ML– why do you think my Daykill on Foxace was a reaction test? He fence-sat way too passively for my tastes and I run on a gut basis for scum-hunting unlike my partner.
And why would you ignore Norman? Is it your belief that trolls can’t be scum?
Because I find it unlikely someone would kill this early in the day. Also, Seacore was online browsing this forum, and nothing was posted, so...
Also, I'll happily vote Norman. It's just hard for me to get a read on trolls. To clarify, I meant I would stop replying to his stupidity.
PEdit: Early information? And if you're replaced, and you're town, we can get a more pro-town player.
Unvote, Vote: Norman
I'm fine with this right now.
In post 119, Tammy wrote:In post 92, Foxace36 wrote:In post 89, Norman wrote:I'm neither what you said Foxace.
I'm just here to confuse the fuck out of you and everyone else. I don't actually plan on offering anything of stubstance. I just want to have the pleasure in pissing all of you off.
That's what i got from that.
If that's how you're going to play, I just want you lynched period. Scum or not, a player like you has no place in this game
My vote stands.
Meh...not a fan of policy lynches based on play style hate or comments like this. Sure policy lynches can be useful, I suppose. I prefer looking for scum.
I bet all the scum are active and posting content less posts like the one I just quoted.In post 126, ManiacalLemon wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if all the scum were lurking, watching us tear the town apart.
In post 124, kondi2424 wrote:Alright, then, LM. Who have you seen that is a potential partner?
In post 131, CooLDoG wrote:In post 52, MaguaofIllusion wrote:I submitted my Daykill on you.
Next time Seacore posts you will be flipped.
Shotty alert.
In post 59, ManiacalLemon wrote:In post 57, Foxace36 wrote:........
Anyways...
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Norman
You seem like the best candidate for a lynch right now?
What say you?
Sheep much? He comes off as more of a noob/troll to me.
Are you really going to defend someone because they are a troll? norman can't be a noob, look at his join date.
norman wrote:As or Magnua, I do believe he might be a scumbag.His refusal to not answer my questions, during night time, is probably an act a scumbag would probably doand then vote me because I randomly make votes depending on first, roster picks and then detection.
Am I missing something here??? During night time?
norman wrote:Everyone else who didn't post and who is currently voting me right after Mr. Magnua did, I take you to be a scumbag.
Nice blanket statement thar.
In post 68, ManiacalLemon wrote:Norman is most likely a troll.
Riggs isn't defending me... his first and only vote isonme.
I'm listening to Attack! by System of a Down... Troll
This is literately the first time I have ever heard the "he is a VI defense" used multiple times by the same person by page 3. Why do you feel the need to defend someone this early. Eat a vote:
vote: lemon
In post 79, ManiacalLemon wrote:I'm going to ignore Norman's slot until he's replaced... if he's replaced >.>
Can everybody vote this guy now?
...
Am I doing it right?
In post 81, greenknight wrote:In post 78, Empking wrote:In post 76, Shadow1psc wrote:In post 74, Norman wrote:ManiacalLemon. You've earned yourself my distrust.
FoS: Lemons, MagnuaOfIllusion, Empking, Pine, and greenknight.
Until you 3 can tell me exactly why you're voting me, (exlcuding Lemons because I think he's trying to bluff me and make me think he's not a scumbag) you will remain on my FoS list.
As for Green Knight who recently asked why I'm asking these "random" questions... No these aren't random questions, genius, these are background checks and investigations.
So by the great power of deduction, your scum list and hunting abilities consists of people suspecting you? Is this correct?
What do you deduce from this?
Norman is clearly trolling. Sadly I don't think this behaviour makes him any more likely than the usual random chance to be scum.
Anyway, after reviewing the archive of the old thread,Vote: AurorusVox. I'm suspicious of the amount of buddying/alliance building he seemed to be doing.
You are buddies with lemon. Why do you feel the need to say exactly what lemon has said twice?
@MoI spoof account:Tell me who has just posted so I can run it through my patented shotty bullshit filterTM
In post 86, ManiacalLemon wrote:In post 80, MaguaofIllusion wrote:@ML– why do you think my Daykill on Foxace was a reaction test? He fence-sat way too passively for my tastes and I run on a gut basis for scum-hunting unlike my partner.
And why would you ignore Norman? Is it your belief that trolls can’t be scum?
Because I find it unlikely someone would kill this early in the day. Also, Seacore was online browsing this forum, and nothing was posted, so...
Also, I'll happily vote Norman. It's just hard for me to get a read on trolls. To clarify, I meant I would stop replying to his stupidity.
PEdit: Early information? And if you're replaced, and you're town, we can get a more pro-town player.
Unvote, Vote: Norman
I'm fine with this right now.
...
...
SO you can't get a read on him and you defend him and you still vote for him.
...
...
Spoiler: the most fucking hilarious string of posts in game ever
In post 119, Tammy wrote:In post 92, Foxace36 wrote:In post 89, Norman wrote:I'm neither what you said Foxace.
I'm just here to confuse the fuck out of you and everyone else. I don't actually plan on offering anything of stubstance. I just want to have the pleasure in pissing all of you off.
That's what i got from that.
If that's how you're going to play, I just want you lynched period. Scum or not, a player like you has no place in this game
My vote stands.
Meh...not a fan of policy lynches based on play style hate or comments like this. Sure policy lynches can be useful, I suppose. I prefer looking for scum.
100% agree. Listen to this guy people.
I bet all the scum are active and posting content less posts like the one I just quoted.In post 126, ManiacalLemon wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if all the scum were lurking, watching us tear the town apart.
@Norman, I can usually make 3 posts a day. Two short, on like this. Some days I can do more, some days I can do less. This is dependent on my work load and the daily tv/cricet/sport schedules.
In post 137, Y u no scum wrote:This is a hydra account of Moneybags and Mcqueen. Mcqueen hasn't gotten back from whatever it is he does on his weekends yet; so yes, this is Moneybags.
/Moneybags
(^Note the post signature)
AVox wrote:
MoI, want a voting alliance in this game?
AVox wrote:
I do. More on this later.
{/quote]
This is Avox wanting us to mass claim after it was obvious had be read the thread that it is terrible idea. It shows that he wasn't reading the thread or seriously considering the repercussions of the plan - which shows that at best he was just interested in getting a post up.
[quoite="AVox"]
Holy shit MoS is in this game. Voting alliance?
AVox wrote:
So all in all, I see only positives coming from it and those trying to suggest otherwise are fearmongering or don't understand the reasons properly.
In post 139, Feysal wrote:So we're live, there are already more new posts than there were before the crash, and we've shot straight past RVS. Things are looking up.
I had one suspect from the original thread I can still remember, and that was xvart, now replaced by Foxace36. My reason for suspecting xvart was his scum read on CooLDoG, which I find questionable. I can agree with the part that scum would be just as confused as the town about whether to mass claim, and they could prefer to let the town sort it out for them. What I don't agree with is that scum would be any more likely to be confused about the setup, and make baseless and erroneous speculation posts about it. On the contrary, I think that is what makes CooLDoG town, particularly since Seacore's clarification post revealed that there was significant confusion within the playerlist.
Now, Foxace36 has made it easy for me to keep my scum read on the slot. Reading his posts has reminded me of my own first game on the site and the excuses I made for my reluctance to vote. I was not lying then, but that did not stop me from being scum in that game. The reaction test does nothing for me.
VOTE: Foxace36
Other players on my suspect list include Typo Incarnate, whose behavior so far seems erratic. I did not think that their suggestion in the original thread that the people caring about alignments were scum was useful, and calling for votes on Norman while acknowledging his trolling for what it is is just pointless. I'm not sure what I expected from that hydra, but not this.
About Norman, I have no read on him and I have never played with him, but his reputation precedes him. His playstyle can be called unconventional, and people should consider that before labeling him as scummy.
There is also ManiacalLemon, whose statement that the benefits of alignment claiming outweigh the risk was just bizarre, when he had only mentioned downsides in the same post.
In post 141, Foxace36 wrote:In post 139, Feysal wrote:So we're live, there are already more new posts than there were before the crash, and we've shot straight past RVS. Things are looking up.
I had one suspect from the original thread I can still remember, and that was xvart, now replaced by Foxace36. My reason for suspecting xvart was his scum read on CooLDoG, which I find questionable. I can agree with the part that scum would be just as confused as the town about whether to mass claim, and they could prefer to let the town sort it out for them. What I don't agree with is that scum would be any more likely to be confused about the setup, and make baseless and erroneous speculation posts about it. On the contrary, I think that is what makes CooLDoG town, particularly since Seacore's clarification post revealed that there was significant confusion within the playerlist.
Now, Foxace36 has made it easy for me to keep my scum read on the slot. Reading his posts has reminded me of my own first game on the site and the excuses I made for my reluctance to vote. I was not lying then, but that did not stop me from being scum in that game. The reaction test does nothing for me.
VOTE: Foxace36
Other players on my suspect list include Typo Incarnate, whose behavior so far seems erratic. I did not think that their suggestion in the original thread that the people caring about alignments were scum was useful, and calling for votes on Norman while acknowledging his trolling for what it is is just pointless. I'm not sure what I expected from that hydra, but not this.
About Norman, I have no read on him and I have never played with him, but his reputation precedes him. His playstyle can be called unconventional, and people should consider that before labeling him as scummy.
There is also ManiacalLemon, whose statement that the benefits of alignment claiming outweigh the risk was just bizarre, when he had only mentioned downsides in the same post.
So you are voting for me based on....
1. The person I replaced sounded scummy.
2. Apparently there is a correlation between my reluctancy to vote at first (Which I had good resoning for) and you reluctancy to vote as scum in a completely different game.
Can't argue with those points. They seem pretty dam solid to me. /sarcasm
In post 144, CooLDoG wrote:@norman, read better, I said work load. I can post thought the day but it depends on my work load. Meaning that if I need do actually do something I will not post as much.
In post 142, Norman wrote:In post 141, Foxace36 wrote:In post 139, Feysal wrote:So we're live, there are already more new posts than there were before the crash, and we've shot straight past RVS. Things are looking up.
I had one suspect from the original thread I can still remember, and that was xvart, now replaced by Foxace36. My reason for suspecting xvart was his scum read on CooLDoG, which I find questionable. I can agree with the part that scum would be just as confused as the town about whether to mass claim, and they could prefer to let the town sort it out for them. What I don't agree with is that scum would be any more likely to be confused about the setup, and make baseless and erroneous speculation posts about it. On the contrary, I think that is what makes CooLDoG town, particularly since Seacore's clarification post revealed that there was significant confusion within the playerlist.
Now, Foxace36 has made it easy for me to keep my scum read on the slot. Reading his posts has reminded me of my own first game on the site and the excuses I made for my reluctance to vote. I was not lying then, but that did not stop me from being scum in that game. The reaction test does nothing for me.
VOTE: Foxace36
Other players on my suspect list include Typo Incarnate, whose behavior so far seems erratic. I did not think that their suggestion in the original thread that the people caring about alignments were scum was useful, and calling for votes on Norman while acknowledging his trolling for what it is is just pointless. I'm not sure what I expected from that hydra, but not this.
About Norman, I have no read on him and I have never played with him, but his reputation precedes him. His playstyle can be called unconventional, and people should consider that before labeling him as scummy.
There is also ManiacalLemon, whose statement that the benefits of alignment claiming outweigh the risk was just bizarre, when he had only mentioned downsides in the same post.
So you are voting for me based on....
1. The person I replaced sounded scummy.
2. Apparently there is a correlation between my reluctancy to vote at first (Which I had good resoning for) and you reluctancy to vote as scum in a completely different game.
Can't argue with those points. They seem pretty dam solid to me. /sarcasm
That's why I asked if you EVER sounded like this at ANY game, EVERYTIME, Foxace. Your alignment remains doubtful and I think I should take some more observation of your actions. As for Feysal, why do you think Foxaxe is scum?
He told me earlier that he usually acted trollish during conversations like these. What is your safe-trigger to which Mr. Foxace is a scumbag?
In post 146, Foxace36 wrote:In post 142, Norman wrote:In post 141, Foxace36 wrote:In post 139, Feysal wrote:So we're live, there are already more new posts than there were before the crash, and we've shot straight past RVS. Things are looking up.
I had one suspect from the original thread I can still remember, and that was xvart, now replaced by Foxace36. My reason for suspecting xvart was his scum read on CooLDoG, which I find questionable. I can agree with the part that scum would be just as confused as the town about whether to mass claim, and they could prefer to let the town sort it out for them. What I don't agree with is that scum would be any more likely to be confused about the setup, and make baseless and erroneous speculation posts about it. On the contrary, I think that is what makes CooLDoG town, particularly since Seacore's clarification post revealed that there was significant confusion within the playerlist.
Now, Foxace36 has made it easy for me to keep my scum read on the slot. Reading his posts has reminded me of my own first game on the site and the excuses I made for my reluctance to vote. I was not lying then, but that did not stop me from being scum in that game. The reaction test does nothing for me.
VOTE: Foxace36
Other players on my suspect list include Typo Incarnate, whose behavior so far seems erratic. I did not think that their suggestion in the original thread that the people caring about alignments were scum was useful, and calling for votes on Norman while acknowledging his trolling for what it is is just pointless. I'm not sure what I expected from that hydra, but not this.
About Norman, I have no read on him and I have never played with him, but his reputation precedes him. His playstyle can be called unconventional, and people should consider that before labeling him as scummy.
There is also ManiacalLemon, whose statement that the benefits of alignment claiming outweigh the risk was just bizarre, when he had only mentioned downsides in the same post.
So you are voting for me based on....
1. The person I replaced sounded scummy.
2. Apparently there is a correlation between my reluctancy to vote at first (Which I had good resoning for) and you reluctancy to vote as scum in a completely different game.
Can't argue with those points. They seem pretty dam solid to me. /sarcasm
That's why I asked if you EVER sounded like this at ANY game, EVERYTIME, Foxace. Your alignment remains doubtful and I think I should take some more observation of your actions. As for Feysal, why do you think Foxaxe is scum?
He told me earlier that he usually acted trollish during conversations like these. What is your safe-trigger to which Mr. Foxace is a scumbag?
UNVOTE:
The very fact that one of your questions have actually shown some relevance has changed my mind about wanting a policy lynch, though you are still on my FoS.
In post 148, Norman wrote:In post 146, Foxace36 wrote:In post 142, Norman wrote:In post 141, Foxace36 wrote:In post 139, Feysal wrote:So we're live, there are already more new posts than there were before the crash, and we've shot straight past RVS. Things are looking up.
I had one suspect from the original thread I can still remember, and that was xvart, now replaced by Foxace36. My reason for suspecting xvart was his scum read on CooLDoG, which I find questionable. I can agree with the part that scum would be just as confused as the town about whether to mass claim, and they could prefer to let the town sort it out for them. What I don't agree with is that scum would be any more likely to be confused about the setup, and make baseless and erroneous speculation posts about it. On the contrary, I think that is what makes CooLDoG town, particularly since Seacore's clarification post revealed that there was significant confusion within the playerlist.
Now, Foxace36 has made it easy for me to keep my scum read on the slot. Reading his posts has reminded me of my own first game on the site and the excuses I made for my reluctance to vote. I was not lying then, but that did not stop me from being scum in that game. The reaction test does nothing for me.
VOTE: Foxace36
Other players on my suspect list include Typo Incarnate, whose behavior so far seems erratic. I did not think that their suggestion in the original thread that the people caring about alignments were scum was useful, and calling for votes on Norman while acknowledging his trolling for what it is is just pointless. I'm not sure what I expected from that hydra, but not this.
About Norman, I have no read on him and I have never played with him, but his reputation precedes him. His playstyle can be called unconventional, and people should consider that before labeling him as scummy.
There is also ManiacalLemon, whose statement that the benefits of alignment claiming outweigh the risk was just bizarre, when he had only mentioned downsides in the same post.
So you are voting for me based on....
1. The person I replaced sounded scummy.
2. Apparently there is a correlation between my reluctancy to vote at first (Which I had good resoning for) and you reluctancy to vote as scum in a completely different game.
Can't argue with those points. They seem pretty dam solid to me. /sarcasm
That's why I asked if you EVER sounded like this at ANY game, EVERYTIME, Foxace. Your alignment remains doubtful and I think I should take some more observation of your actions. As for Feysal, why do you think Foxaxe is scum?
He told me earlier that he usually acted trollish during conversations like these. What is your safe-trigger to which Mr. Foxace is a scumbag?
UNVOTE:
The very fact that one of your questions have actually shown some relevance has changed my mind about wanting a policy lynch, though you are still on my FoS.
As a right of paranoia, I'm putting you on mine because you seem to be agitated by Feysal's introspections.