Andrius wrote:I think dana said Unrecruitable = Uncultable somewhere earlier in D2.
I don't see this O_o
Andy: Dana didn't publishly state that. Oversoul said he PMed the mod and was confirmed they are essentially the same thing.Oversoul wrote:Kast, I pmed the mod about the difference between Uncultable and Unrecruitable and they said the difference was the wording.
They wouldn't elaborate on that so I am going to say that the words are interchanageable.
Grammar fail me now!You only started posting content after multiple players stated that it is a cult characteristic to start posting more and being active.
Kast wrote:BB: You played for 8+ days of posting without reading through the game, and the whole time you ignored or flamed people that called out out for fence sitting and being non-committal. You only started posting content after multiple players stated that it is a cult characteristic to start posting more and being active.
You tried to setup multiple haphazard cult accusations, including against claimed WL's that are known to be non CR, and at most one of whom might be a recruit (who wouldn't be worth targeting). So yes, I think you are very likely to be cult. You've done nothing to change that.
BTW, the uncultable versus unrecruitable thing happened day 2, after you joined and started posting, so claiming you were unaware of it until now is really stretching plausibility.
Andy: Dana didn't publishly state that. Oversoul said he PMed the mod and was confirmed they are essentially the same thing.Oversoul wrote:Kast, I pmed the mod about the difference between Uncultable and Unrecruitable and they said the difference was the wording.
They wouldn't elaborate on that so I am going to say that the words are interchanageable.
Kast wrote:Andy: Dana didn't publishly state that. Oversoul said he PMed the mod and was confirmed they are essentially the same thing.Oversoul wrote:Kast, I pmed the mod about the difference between Uncultable and Unrecruitable and they said the difference was the wording.
They wouldn't elaborate on that so I am going to say that the words are interchanageable.
zMuffinMan wrote:You've... got your eye on me, Andrius?
Well, shit. I better be careful. The guy who thinks GW is mafia, not CR, and is telling us we should go after the CR, while keeping his vote on GW, has his eye on me.
I have no idea why I have a town read on you.
Blackberry wrote:There was a MASON RECRUITER in the LAST game Andrius... -_-
What happens when Cult cults a Mafia? That's fricken dumb as hell and way too cult-sided, no?
Blackberry wrote:If the cult can recruit mafia...
Then if the cults are still alive after a short while, I'm all down for being recruited. =D But not tonight and probably not the next night. After that if you're winning, recruit the snot out of me or I'll hack into your mafia acct. and delete it.
xoxo
Andrius wrote:Blackberry wrote:If the cult can recruit mafia...
Then if the cults are still alive after a short while, I'm all down for being recruited. =D But not tonight and probably not the next night. After that if you're winning, recruit the snot out of me or I'll hack into your mafia acct. and delete it.
xoxo
After Succession Mafia I, I will kill any townie who has this mindset in two days (assuming CR isn't dead by then).
Because Gurgi, singer, and Poro all lurked in endgame and they were the votes I NEEDED to push a Flameaxe lynch, together with xvart.
But they lurked.
And lurked.
And enabled the scumlynch.
So what happened?
They won.
As Cult.
Getting recruited in endgame for playing like shit.
I am still bitter about that- we were THIS CLOSE to having the win.
But the townies still left weren't there.
Nikanor wrote:Perhaps the mafia has a recruiting ability. That would explain Unrecruitable mastin-town versus Uncultable Toog-mafia.
berry wrote:My boyfriend happens to be a computer hacker.
I didn't know you and shotty were a thing.