TheFool wrote:
DonJosh wrote:BADBADBADBADBAD
Huh?
Think. There was a wagon on a Townie day 1. Why the hell
TheFool wrote:
DonJosh wrote:BADBADBADBADBAD
Huh?
CMPunk wrote:Seems scum would go out of their way to pin this on Thor. Yes, he said he would take the blame if Ray flipped town but that does not make Thor scum IMO. It just made him wrong, like 6 other people were including me (Yes it took 7 to lynch, not just Thor)
CMPunk wrote:Thor is town
Thor665 wrote:CMPunk wrote:Very interested as to why, in 27 posts Ray has yet to put his vote anywhere, seems overly cautious to me and could be scum trying not to draw attention to themselves.
I agree with you Thor.
Wait...you're not Thor, *I'm* Thor...but you're almost quoting Thor's case! In any case, Thor is fething brilliant, so you should probably back him up since you think exactly like him and may be as awesome as him too (well, not really, but there's always hope).
Thor wrote:havingfitz wrote:What are your thoughts on CMPunk (sorry if you have posted it already).
Posted them today, consider him a likely scumspect, consider him in the less certain pool of three. Would vote, but prefer a vote on Blindfaeth.
BBmolla wrote:@Thor: I'd like you to go more in depth about why you think he's a likely scumspect.
I think CM-Town would imply Thor-Town a little bit, but I don't know if CM-Scum would imply Thor-Scum.
Oh, and I think CM-Scum implies DK-Town. Possibly.
Thoughts?
Also, another question for those not voting CM, what makes CM townier than the person you are currently voting?
Sky wrote:TheFool, you think a 50% chance of lynching scum isn't good?
DonJosh wrote:Think. There was a wagon on a Townie day 1. Why the hell wouldn't scum be on the wagon?
BBmolla wrote:Also, another question for those not voting CM, what makes CM townier than the person you are currently voting?
Thor665 wrote:There were two three person groups - he was in one of them, hence he is a scumspect.
Thor665 wrote:Because blindfaeth is in a three person group with two players I consider pretty likely town
Thor665 wrote:DonJosh, blindfaeth, DeityKabuto
Thor665 wrote:I was never super enthused on DK town - and his presence as a counter wagon to town when before that I thought he was counter wagon to scum does tend to adjust ones beliefs. Derpy-doo.
There's also scum off the wagon, but those are a little harder to predict where they were lurking until you get a couple more flips.
Thor665 wrote:@The Fool - quite frankly, I just split the wagon in half.
Some scum would want to get on early to a wagon they saw as possibly gaining speed, and both scum teams would have been fine supporting that wagon. This is the first half of the wagon.
After some scum get on, other scum from their team would want some other people to show support for the wagon and then might snark in towards the end to finish pushing it through - these would be the tail end of the wagon.
Two groups, probably at least 1 scum in each set of three.
There's also scum off the wagon, but those are a little harder to predict where they were lurking until you get a couple more flips.
TheFool wrote:seems contrary. And even without that, I'm not sure I see the logic in assuming that at least one of the last three votesmustbe scum.
TheFool wrote:There's also three of them; it's just as concise a group
DeityKabuto wrote:lmao. You are dividing the wagons into two groups when you are the main driver who got everyone to sheep them, but nonetheless scum were on that wagon.
Thor665 wrote:DeityKabuto wrote:lmao. You are dividing the wagons into two groups when you are the main driver who got everyone to sheep them, but nonetheless scum were on that wagon.
Wagon contained 7 of 10 alive players.
There are 5 scum alive.
Derp - there were scum on the wagon, derp-derp-duuuuh.
Thor665 wrote:blindfaeth wrote:K so since his role hasn't been revealed yet how can you add him to the list of people that were scum that said that to you? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding >.>
Mmmm? You're seriously misunderstanding something.
1. Nowhere in my sig does it suggest that it's keeping track of scum who do that.
2. If you DID believe that it was only a list about scum who did that...why does it matter that I didn't call out havingfitz on it?
blindfaeth wrote:[1]The fact that you have that counter in your quote is an indication that you dislike that particularly weak method of suspecting someone used against you. Or at least thats how I interpreted it. So I thought you'd go out of your way to show some irritation with it, does that make sense?
[2]I'm also not really following the 2 groups of 3 thing Thor is talking about. I understand it but I don't know where he's pulling the numbers from as far as its likely that so many jumped on at the beginning and so many jumped on at the end. They could have been all of the first votes as far as we know especially if they are on different teams?
Thor665 wrote:1. Despite misgivings he's still more town looking than you or CM - sorry, deal with it.
2. Not scum in the last three votes of a Day 1 wagon on town with 5 scum available? Really? Where the heck were the scum then, 2-3 in the first 4 votes and then 2-3 in the three votes off the wagon? Derp-derp-herp, amirite?
TheFool wrote:Thor665 wrote:1. Despite misgivings he's still more town looking than you or CM - sorry, deal with it.
2. Not scum in the last three votes of a Day 1 wagon on town with 5 scum available? Really? Where the heck were the scum then, 2-3 in the first 4 votes and then 2-3 in the three votes off the wagon? Derp-derp-herp, amirite?
Yeah, I get that, but it still seems like a jump from that to "blindfaeth is dramatically scummier than CMPunk because he was next to townier people on the wagon".
Also, I'm not sure how it's so derp-derp-herp to assume that the votes were scattered non-uniformly.
And yeah, the signiture thing is pretty pointless.