This blatant flip-flopping is painful to read. I think you need to spend some time alone on the moon. A millennium should do it.
inHimshallibe wrote:I don't think you interpreted my original reasoning correctly.
For 1)
not commenting on discussion between those of us who had voted and subsequently unvoted TheLonging
, 2)being vague about chesskid, and 3)killing innocent ponies.
The bold indicates I was upset he was using that outdated reason.
Your words. Your point was that he used an outdated reason (TheLonging's reasons) that other people voted/unvoted over, and that WLC was scummy for not defending his vote because of those unvotes.
He didn't use an outdated reason so he couldn't have been scummy for not backing up something that never got knocked down in the first place.
If you had a problem with him not doing more scumhunting in post 89, for not commenting on the rest of chesskid's play at that time or for commenting on other people's play at that time: say something about that. Don't make it just about TheLonging, because that implies his vote is relevant to TheLonging's vote and not anybody else's suspicion about chesskid, like Maziek. Why didn't you have a problem with him not commenting on Maziek's case?
Why didn't you acknowledge that WLC said he was looking into chesskid's meta, which meant he would come back later with more discussion on chesskid? You clearly did not want to make that wagon about his lack of scumhunting. Your vote was a hop from a preview edit 7 minutes after his post that indicated he was in the middle of forming a read on chesskid. If you had said you were voting him for the reason you are now claiming, that would have been a temporary vote. Keeping it vague with heavy implications that it was about an old "no lynch" scum tell allows scum to stay on longer and not have to backup the point unless someone picks up on it.
You clearly did not want to get a better read on WLC after your vote, because your next posts are agreeing with chesskid's vote (also not about lack of scumhunting) and telling reiterating that its a scummy post without any more explanation. WLC defends his case and you don't respond. You ask other people questions, but not him. You aren't looking the part of a town player pressuring a low content player to produce more content.
Tl;DR - inHim is desperate scum hoping we aren't reading the thread.