Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:That's a horrible reason. You do not lie about the formatting of your role PM just because someone might respond to it at some point, especially if the town has a good reason to distrust you because you just claimed townie [one-shot hider] instead of one-shot cop.GreyICE wrote:Very discernable motive, CES. Wanted to see who would pick up on it, who would let it linger, who would walk into a trap.
Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:It seems extremely likely to me that each role PM has Name - Role name [bounty power], so pushing the mislynch doesn't work because people can back up Rhinox. I wouldn't even expect that type of subterfuge from Toastyscum anyway even if it were useful.
At each turn your story has become more inconsistent today, CES. I was reaction fishing. It's fun to do. I can link you to plenty of games where I do it as town. I've claimed scum, misclaimed watcher target, fakeclaimed full jailkeeper as a 1-shot, etc.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:The lie was the bit about not having a role name. Was the "anti-town" comment not about that?
I don't think what you did would've been a bad play for scum if you hadn't claimed not to have a role name. Not having to claim an innocent on Toasty (who was the obvious investigation target) could easily result in an extra mislynch (assuming Toastytown) and the switcheroo probably doesn't hurt you enough to overcome the conf. innocent status conferred upon you by UK and the sooner the game ends, the less likely we are to question it.
Give me one good reason you lied about having a role name.
If I'm confirmed town, why would I waste the opportunity by not reaction fishing?
They both claimed after a cop claimed, AND after a possible miller retracted his claim. The way I saw it if Nacho's Jahudo case was good enough and Vi got lynched he was a very probable target for my investigation. Both claiming after they waited a while to see if there would be any counterclaim would ensure one lived as 'confirmed miller.'Rhinox wrote:You wanna go there? What was the scum motive for Jahudo-hyposcum counterclaiming Vi-scum possibility that you were pushing?greyICE wrote:What's the scum motive for counterclaiming my scumbuddy there?
Jahudo not heavily pushing Vi day 1 or 2 after counterclaiming Vi was just bad in my book. I'm sorry, but when I'm counterclaimed as town, my reaction is EXACTLY what I did on day 1 after Vi's hider claim - latch on like a pitbull and not let go. When Vi claimed 1-shot hider, the next person I voted for was AFTER Vi got lynched. NEVER before.
I was wrong.