Firefly Mafia - Voyage over

[RangeroftheNorth]

Reading thread. Will post soon

[armlx]

Zoe Washburn.

[EmpTyger]

I would recommend that we formally go through and give everyone a chance to counterclaim Zoe. I myself would not be willing to vote armlx at this point unless he is counterclaimed.

I am not Zoe.

[RangeroftheNorth]

I am not Zoe

[Fritzler]

Not zoe

[BabyJesus]

unvote

[Fuldu]

I would recommend that we formally go through and give everyone a chance to counterclaim Zoe. I myself would not be willing to vote armlx at this point unless he is counterclaimed.

I am not Zoe.

I'm not Zoe, but I think doing this formally in this instance is unnecessary and going to waste a lot of time. We're not at deadline, and we're unlikely to suddenly push to another lynch without the actual Zoe, if it isn't armlx, having the opportunity to say so.

unvote: armlx

[Otaku376]

unvote: armlx

[Thok]

So, is nobody worried about the possibility of scum being given safe names to claim?

[Fuldu]

So, is nobody worried about the possibility of scum being given safe names to claim?

I'm worried about it, but I'm not going to lynch someone with a safe name at this stage of the game, solely on the basis of that single worry.

[BabyJesus]

So, is nobody worried about the possibility of scum being given safe names to claim?

I would imagine that is the case, personally. Isn't that usually the case in theme games?

I just dn't think armlx is the play as I have said, I only voted him so he would spill his name. Waiting for one more vote is stupid.

[Fuldu]

So, is nobody worried about the possibility of scum being given safe names to claim?

I would imagine that is the case, personally. Isn't that usually the case in theme games?

I don't know about

usually

. In my experience it's actually pretty rare, but there's generally some means of preventing the game from being broken by a mass claim Day One, and more so with experienced mods. Offhand, I'm disinclined to believe that Nanook would have been so unwilling to claim if he'd been given a safe name to use. But that's hardly a reason not to worry about it at all.

[Yosarian2]

I am not Zoe.

[Dragon Phoenix]

Well, I'm not Zoe either for that matter. Talitha threw in several safe claims for the scum in Muppets mafia, so I'm not convinced just by a likely name.

[Thok]

I guess my worry is that I'm suspicious of how armlx handled his role claim, and I already had reasons to vote him before his claim. Now granted, armlx has a ridiculous ability to make me suspicious of him but I just find his handling of the situation weird.

That said, Fuldu has a somewhat valid point about Nanook not faking a claim. So I'll

unvote armlx

Any thoughts on where to go from here?

[the silent speaker]

I'm a little worried about a safe claim here, but what the hell, I'm not voting him anyway so there's no harm in my continuing to. As to where to now, we could always pressure Iammars.

[Mr. Whedon]

Vote Count

Iammars (2)

- EmpTyger, Yosarian

EmpTyger (2)

- Iammars, armlx

~deathsquiggle~ (1)

- Peacebringer

Baby Jesus (1)

- d8p

armlx (1)

- Fritzler

Not voting: ~deathsquiggle~, Ranger, the silent speaker, DP, Baby Jesus, Fuldu, otaku, Thok

8 to lynch.

[EmpTyger]

Iammars, PB, and ~ds~ have not yet posted since armlx’s Zoe claim. (d8P having already claimed.) PB seems particularly absent.


BabyJ:

<snip>I just dn't think armlx is the play as I have said, I only voted him so he would spill his name. Waiting for one more vote is stupid.

Oh, is that so?

I think only a claim will save me at this point. It'll take another vote.

Vote Count

Iammars (5)

- Fuldu, Yosarian, EmpTyger, TSS, Thok

EmpTyger (4)

- Iammars, Baby Jesus, armlx, Fritzler

~deathsquiggle~ (1)

- Peacebringer

Mini Neo (1)

- Dragon Phoenix

Not voting: ~deathsquiggle~, bloojay, d8P, Mini Neo,

8 to lynch.

bloojay has responded to the prod. Seeking replacement for Mini Neo.

Seriously, lets not lynch Iammars today. WTF are you people thinking?

Could you please explain your, as you put it, stupidity?


Ranger:
Do you have any thoughts about the game so far?

[Fritzler]

unvote

[RangeroftheNorth]

[Came down with a cold and still am rather busy with end-of-semester work. May still be posting infrequently, thought hopefully not for too much longer.]

I really don’t like how DP, d8P, VisM, and bloojay voted for Nanook… for lurking… when he also wasn’t posting in any other thread… on Thanksgiving week?! Especially right after I listed 4 concrete reasons against armlx; each of which was much better than anything against Nanook, and each of which received no attention whatsoever despite the intense focus placed on Nanook.


DP:
You began the bandwagon against Nanook to lurkerprod him. Why haven’t you said anything since his return?


d8P:
You were the second on the lurkerprod bandwagon. Kind of ironic how after that you lurked the entire week, isn’t it?


VisM:
This is the defense you gave for your vote of Nanook:

No real reason for anyone. This game started slow, and then fell back.

As you are still voting Nanook, do you still believe this to be true?


bloojay:

hmmm....well, i know Nanook has been inactive in all of his other games. Perhaps a prod, Mod? Maybe that'd pull something up.

Can you explain why you are still voting Nanook? Because I can’t figure out why you would have voted him in [85], and then make [107] without unvoting.

Vote: EmpTyger

I am suspicious of the way he attempted to divert the bandwagon on Nanook with some fairly week evidence against armlx, and I am suspicious of how he has been attempting to lead the town.

[Otaku376]

Vote: EmpTyger

good enough for me

[~deathsquiggle~]

BTW, I'm *still* waiting for a good explanation of the retarded bandwagon on me.

[Otaku376]

Is one vote really a bandwagon?
although it is strange PB is voting a claimed mason

[d8P]

Happy with vote.

I should also tell you that the mod explicitly confirmed ~deathsquiggle~'s innocence

[armlx]

~: You were sorta suspicious Day 1, and then it wagonned....