Oh, great. The guy who tunneled to the point of blindness got replaced by the guy who WIFOMs himself out of everything. Kill Corvuus, too.
Corvuus wrote:DRK: I'm still not sure why you are attacking me if you are town. You're basically encouraging me to vote you and I'm not sure why you would do this when the stated position of farside, etc. is that your actions are 'scummy', etc. and that you are scum that must die and I'm not agreeing with the final conclusion based on my prior experience with you. So the question is, do you actually care what I really think or are you just generating noise?
Do you really wish me to just agree with Farside's view of you this game? Do you want me to lynch you?
I'm still not sure why you think DeathRowKitty
can't
attack you if he's town. He's basically looking for scum, and the only way to really do that is to get reactions out of you. Threatening to OMGUS him when you claim that you can't vote him because you aren't sure if he's scum is terribad.
Corvuus wrote:I don't have a case on DRK, nor am I building one, and what meta argument that DRK is scum are you talking about? If you actually read what I wrote, DRK-meta and his actions do not fit scum, I'm confused/intrigued by this but I can not discount the existence of scum day talk. If scum day talk did not exist at all, then I'd say DRK is more likely town based on his actions, not just meta considerations.
If you're going to excuse every single town read you've got by saying there's scum day talk, you are not going to get anywhere in this game. Day talk is powerful, but there are limits to what it can do.
Corvuus wrote:DTmaster and Equinox: You both are interesting in that you have gambits and plays and are either 'smart' town or 'smart' scum trying to lead town.
Even your town reads are mired deep in the sea of WIFOM! Think about what the two of us are saying and how any of it benefits scum. We both probably have an agenda (I know I do); what's the agenda?
Corvuus wrote:Equinox: I can make blanket statements since that is how you get reactions. If DGB or DTmaster flubs their response, does it really matter if I am 'fully understanding all 800+ posts'? No. In fact, i can literally say whatever I deem necessary and you can judge why I am saying it but by saying outrageous things you definitely get a response.
Considering that your "reaction test" consisted of misrepresenting DTMaster's points, I don't see how you could read their reactions. They're not going to flub it; after all, it's there in the thread, and scum don't make stuff up as they go because they need to be consistent. The response you would've gotten from both town and scum was, "Hey, you're doing it wrong." That's what you got.
Corvuus wrote:With regards to 'hedging' my bets. I'm not sure of DRK's alignment. I'm not going to vote someone who I don't actually think is definite scum and i'm not going to defend someone who may be scum. If you claim I am hedging, then why are both you (DTmaster, Equinox) going for non-DRK (Feysal?)?
All right, stop right there.
You aren't sure of DeathRowKitty's alignment. For all the talk you've made so far, all we're left sitting with is a null read of DeathRowKitty. If I got this situation down correctly, you've got a townish read of him but fully discount it because of the possibility that scum are coaching him; therefore, you can't really accuse him (except you just did above) or really defend him (except you just did above).
Well, then, time to get sure, methinks.
Accusing us of hedging is silly. Hedging is, "Well, I mean, he
could
be scum, but he could be town, too..." We're saying outright that Feysal is scummier than DeathRowKitty.