If you're bored, read this game with a focus on DGB. It's worth the time. I have, on more than one occasion, joined a game primarily to see what the heck DGB's gonna pull in it.
That said, I'm getting a gut read as well.
Is this a joke or what is going on here I don't know what to think of thisGorrad wrote:http://www.mafiascum.net/archive/viewto ... 1b894dc06d
If you're bored, read this game with a focus on DGB. It's worth the time. I have, on more than one occasion, joined a game primarily to see what the heck DGB's gonna pull in it.
That said, I'm getting a gut read as well.Unvote, Vote: Gorrad
If you're referring to the first part, it is not a joke. DGB is one of my favorite mafia players, as she plays the game to have fun as opposed to winning.Cyberbob wrote:Is this a joke or what is going on here I don't know what to think of thisGorrad wrote:http://www.mafiascum.net/archive/viewto ... 1b894dc06d
If you're bored, read this game with a focus on DGB. It's worth the time. I have, on more than one occasion, joined a game primarily to see what the heck DGB's gonna pull in it.
That said, I'm getting a gut read as well.Unvote, Vote: Gorrad
I can't think of a funny or an as close to funny as I can get response to this, but I do agree with the vote. So well done there...Antihero wrote:It's fun to watch scum fail.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Korlash
What would the response have been? And talking to Chevre about what? You made this craptacular post that didn't say anything but was disguised as content.Korlash wrote:I can't think of a funny or an as close to funny as I can get response to this, but I do agree with the vote. So well done there...Antihero wrote:It's fun to watch scum fail.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Korlash
Still, I'd much rather be talking to Chevre about it, but hey I'll take whatever I can get...
Korlash wrote:I may have been in my coma-nap for a while so the term "normal" game doesn't seem to mean to me what it should, but why would you be suspicious of... anything, when KK posted like an [exagerated] number of possible, likely, and/or simply for aesthetic design roles on page one. Would you be any more suspicious if he had claimed to be a paranoid gun owner? Or an unlynchable? Or a professional dog walker? Seriously, what the hell is that? That's not a profession... go get a job hippie...
RC hit it on the head.Walk me through this one.
If a post restriction means what I think it means, you just wasted a post.lol, rhetoric.
I did look at the abilities silly. I also looked that other people looked at the abilities and found similar results, absolutely nothing. So, ultimately, I was waiting for him to say he didn't have a post restriction which was my suspicion all along. And I think you came to the same conclusion.But he didn't ignore it. He said he was just going to ignore it, but it looked like he wanted you to post more on it. He didn't look at the abilities like other people.
It wasn't disguised as content, it's a simple question directed at Chevre surrounded by the special korlash sauce. And if you want to get anal about stuff like that your vote didn't have a shred of "content" backing it up either. Also the response would have been one of those killer laugh out loud and have all of your workplace look at you funny jokes, but sadly I've never been able to do one of those...Antihero wrote:What would the response have been? And talking to Chevre about what? You made this craptacular post that didn't say anything but was disguised as content.
And that would make sense to me. Yet you made it seem as though you were suspicious simply because it was a normal game. In your "summary" post you failed to mention the list in any way and simply used the fact that this was a normal game to explain your suspicions.Chevre wrote:Korlash, I was suspicious of the person claiming to have an "ability" that made no appearance on the list the Moderator gave to us. Yes, I would be suspicious even if he had claimed Paranoid Gun Owner or Unlynchable, but I'm more suspicious because he claimed an ability that was not listed.