Button, why'd you random vote IS (after my half-reasoned RVS vote on him) while asking these questions:
TheButtonmen wrote:StrangerCoug wrote:VOTE: CooLDoG for sucking.
Is he actually policy worthy or is this just RVS stage stuff.
Lord Cable wrote:
Anyways, confirm and all that jazz, preemptive OMGUS
vote: Plum
.
You have never played a game with Plum before as far as I can tell so I'm curious why you would assume she's going to vote you.
?
CooLDoG wrote:
@SC, I wanted him to claim, but after it became apparent that he wouldn't I threw the hammer. That was it.
Previous to your demand on the LC show:
Lord Cable wrote:Not claiming for such a terrible wagon.
Lord Cable wrote:Needless to say, if I'm a PR and claim, I'm outed and probably useless for the rest of the game. If I'm a VT and claim, mafia won't kill me and town won't trust me. I see no reason why I should claim. Leaving the ambiguity is better.
Besides, PR claims should never be the basis of your lynch decision. I've pushed for lynches on unclaimed players before and have even hammered them from time to time because I felt that a claim was irrelevant - they were just that scummy.
Lord Cable wrote:Even though I want to maintain ambiguity? I still stand by my argument that claimign is bad. If we go into
Night with an unclaimed player who is seen as scummy, it leaves WIFOM for scum. They might worry that a
Vig will kill me. They might worry that I'm a powerful PR. Or they might just think I'm VT and worth keeping alive.
A claim will just make night into one of two scenarios instead of opening up cans of WIFOM.
What made you think he'd listen, especially given that you didn't make any real counterarguments to his 'I'm not going to claim' stance:
CooLDoG wrote:@Lord cable, how about this: claim or die. Not being trusted for the rest of the game is better then getting hammered. It will cause some problems down the road for the town if you don't claim.
Button, why did you sheep IS and vote me immediately Day 1? You commented on me little if at all Day 1, if I recall, so. Why didn't you attack SC, whom you'd had issues with Day 1?
Also Button - what in the world were your thoughts about Guderian's play, especially his Day 1 play, when you posted this:
TheButtonmen wrote:Lets start off with
Unvote: Plum
for now.
Re: Guderian He doesn't have enough finished games to really meta him but he has had this style (belligerent, demanding people explain why they are voting him rather then scumhunting) as town before, that combined with the lack of competing wagons so far today leads me to ask the following.
@IS, Plum and SC:
How open are you to moving your votes?
? And who was your top suspect at the time and why? Why did you not speak much if at all about your suspects Day 2?
Also, please answer:
Plum wrote:TheButtonmen wrote:Lets start off with
Unvote: Plum
for now.
@IS, Plum and SC:
How open are you to moving your votes?
1. Why unvote me?
CooLDoG: What exactly were the results of the following:
CooLDoG wrote:In light of the Guderian and Plum debate, I'm going to iso both of them right now.
?
tl;dr
- Button,talk. And also, claim please. I have a hammer in hand and am tempted to use it.