Mini 1097: Simple Mafia

[Guderian]

Vote : Jerbs

Whats wrong with confidence?

FOS: Nacho

Clearly didnt take enough time to make his vote look random. My name is spelled right.

[Guderian]

On an obvious townie?

??

[Guderian]

Mind sharing your 'town read' with the unwashed.

[Guderian]

FOS: LC

For being deliberately obtuse.

[Guderian]

Why the FoS instead of a vote?

Unless your Jerbs vote was a "serious" vote

Answering your own question.

So I guess gut=obvious town?

[Guderian]

a. thats nice.
b. thats nice.
c. no one cares.

Weird attempt to use other players meta to make yourself pro-town?

[Guderian]

and thus, that makes strangercoug.......?

[Guderian]

I like the LC wagon, but the two posts Jerbs has given have given me more scum vibes then all of LC's rolled into one.

My question was directed to thebuttonman. He makes plenty of sweeping statements, with no conclusion. TBM, what is you final verdict/reason for pointing out all those things in #37.

[Guderian]

There's two pages, count the votes yourself.

LC has three votes. Why are you afraid to hammer him?

[Guderian]

unvote

vote: Lord Cable

[Guderian]

I wonder which scumbag is going to sheepishly show up and bus their partner?

[Guderian]

Plum, instead of la-di-da ing, why aren't you voting Lord cable? I see nothing in your posts that imply you would be against such an act.

[Guderian]

[Guderian]

The only person that LC didnt mention at all was Nachomamma8. And he didnt post at all day 1. Maybe hopping the wagon on his scum buddy would disappear?

Vote: Nachomamma8

Plum, what you saying here?

Always excusing himself, FOSing LC, avoiding voting him for cintrived reasons.

I would like to note who didn't vote him. You. So I'm not sure what youre trying to pull here.

If we lynch nacho and then if the game is still on, plum, I am pretty sure this game is over.

[Guderian]

Plum's logic looks good, but makes little sense. I'm not sure why you didn't hammer him yesterday instead of waiting around. I dont think his wagon was certain before I put the vote on him.

I'll put my vote on plum If you promise to wipe out nachomamma tomorrow should I die in the night. I'm not partial which order they go.

unvote

Vote: Plum

[Guderian]

I called out LC post 23. I vote you because really to me, you two are the only scum candidate left. If its your first then nacho, or nacho first then you, is immaterial to me.

[Guderian]

LC tried to attack me, it failed....

I found nacho scummier out of you two. I will switch back to him if there is a choice between you two.

Do you deny he is scummy?

No crap I want to setup two lynches! hooray! If we could lynch you and nacho, I would Imagen it would be auto win for town.

[Guderian]

LC was such an organic wagon I would be really surprised if there was any mafia on it. It only took 3 pages, Im sure the scum buddy would try and slow it down somehow, mess around etc, etc.

[Guderian]

hm. How so.

[Guderian]

What would be appreciated is some nacho posting.

[Guderian]

CoolDoG, most wagons I see that are very fast almost always have town on them. Scum don't want to get mixed up with some sort of vote/shenanigans that would make them looks bad.

Also, yes on nacho.

unvote

vote: nacho

preview: SCUM ALERT.

Vote: TheButtonmen
Still hasn't answered my question.
Still is scum.

Totally irrelevant vote here. SCUM
You posted very little day one, which is scummy. SCUM

inclined to bus in a quicklynch situation.

So why aren't you voting the busser? whoever that is. TBM was the first person to vote LC You nk of jerbs makes sense, you want to distribute blame about the LC wagon and claim scum bussing.

game over.

[Guderian]

This has been a scum bag destruction. IS, you still have time to claim your share of the glory if you get on this wagon.

[Guderian]

IS, are you claiming 3 mafia in a nine man setup?

[Guderian]

For one, I want to know more about why IS thinks there is three mafia. Town only win 30% of the time in 12 man games. How would it possibly be fair in a 3 man game?

I isoed TBM (albiet not much to see), and I can't see anything overly scummy. Or scummy at all. Though, posts with more than one line with a vote would help me get a read on him.

Actually, I reread plum now that she has laid out her explanation of why she didn't hammer, and it kinda sorta makes sense. Not sure i'm 100% there yet, but there really wasn't that much time or lag where she was messing around and not hammering. So I think that's almost a moot point now.

[Guderian]

If Nacho was truly scummy, then he is an idiot and he will be dealt with accordingly.

Would you mind explaining this line?

[Guderian]

For one, I'm sure people have seen your 'case' and decided that it isnt much of anything.

Instead of going all el Jefe on me, join this wagon and lynch scum and claim some of the glory. There is still time.

[Guderian]

Stranger, I don't see what about Internet's statement there makes him scummy, or scum at all. It just looks misguided.

I dont understand why you're voting him over it.

[Guderian]

IS, the difference is that those were 12 player games, this is 9. An extra mislynch or two is a big deal, which is why I bring it up.

3:9 is a lot different that 3:6

[Guderian]

-_____-. You didn't realize this was a 9 player game? I'm not sure what to make of this.

In that case, Nacho is too obvious to be scum.

I thought this of Lord Cable and his crazy declarations like "cooldog is obv town", but he turned out to be scum. I see no reason why we would assume that nacho is any different.

[Guderian]

No. What I said was it is EITHER one of plum or nacho. If we lynch them one after another, I am sure we are going to win. Ergo, I am going to support a lynch on either. That I was I would wagon either.

I never said I thought both were mafia.

I'm not sure how I derailed the LC wagon. I pointed out his crazy statements before you had even voted him. I thought that was what made you vote him.

You are the one who proclaims 3 mafia, then backs down when you read the setup. Yes I am going to call this out.

[Guderian]

Hm, wut? Which part of the logic (none explained) doesn't makes sense?

Lets look at what I actually said

If we lynch nacho and then if the game is still on, plum, I am pretty sure this game is over.

Clearly indicating one scum

I called out LC post 23. I vote you because really to me, you two are the only scum candidate left. If its your first then nacho, or nacho first then you, is immaterial to me.

Showing I think there is only one scum.

Are you seriously voting me solely based of the fact you think I thought there was 3 scum, WHICH IS FALSE? I never claimed 3 scum.

If you want a scumtastic fluff reasons for voting, vote IS for clearly not knowing how many people were playing this game.

[Guderian]

First, that statement of yours is so wrong its funny,

Second

Guderian's logic doesn't make sense here.

What are you talking about in this sentence.

[Guderian]

1. If town win so low with 3:9 (30%) how would any sane reviewer have a 3:6. I was arguing that it makes sense for a 2:7, not 3:6. Read the quote again. Slowly.

2. The game may still be ongoing after plum dies, or it may not be. But it will definitely not be ongoing after plum and nacho die.

I can't believe you're seriously considering the fact miscounting the number of people in a game is a-ok. I still dont understand your case.

[Guderian]

So why exactly are you voting me?

Because you perceive that I claimed 3 scum, then backtracked, then called out IS, all of which is false?

(also, mind deciphering your last post. What are you talking about? "95% sure that the remaining Mafiate has a higher IQ than Lord Cable")

[Guderian]

You have yet to explain why you are voting me. Stop dodging the question. You went from here to here in 2 posts:

I don't see the case on Guderian. Sorry.

This, however, I'll buy. Guderian's logic doesn't make sense here.

VOTE: Guderian

[Guderian]

Explain you goddamn case then. I am asking what the reason is. I still dont understand it. is it this?:

So why exactly are you voting me?

Because you perceive that I claimed 3 scum, then backtracked, then called out IS, all of which is false?

Going after IS? Hardly. I don't think he is scum. The scum is nacho.

[Guderian]

The difference is, i'm not scum.

Dont be so butthurt that someone else found the scum, IS, and join my happy wagon to win this game.

[Guderian]

^^^^^^

This is why either nacho or plum is scum.

Nacho makes a 'case' and disappears like smoke. Plum craps her paints at L-1, but now that the pressure is off decides she can act high and mighty. I stand vindicated. These two should go 1-2.

[Guderian]

Would you mind laying out the cases against me so I can refute them?

No one has done that yet.

[Guderian]

Hello all,

My name is Conrad. For the last week and a half, I have been on vacation. During that time, my little brother saw fit to start using this account to play some game. Instead of not using this account, he has abused it.

I have just returned. I have read this game, and from what I can see, I would like to deeply apologize to all people playing this game. Instead of a game of mafia being what it should be, a fun gathering of like minded people, he-- and this account-- have turned it into a virtual cesspit.

I am greatly offended and saddened by what has happened here. Being courteous to your fellow man and woman, respectful, Is what I hold most dear in this world. This has been grievously violated.

I understand if you no longer want to continue having this account in the game. At this point, I can either replace out, be lynched, or whatever the players in this game may choose. Nothing excuses this behavior. Losing is one thing, being a dick totally another.

Thank you,

Conrad

[Guderian]

Was not lying at all, but you guys are way too paranoid.

He was right however....