Ok...First you say I had a "friendly back and forth" with horrordude, and now you say my interactions with him were minimal. Were you just hoping I wouldn't point that out?
You certainly didn't suspect him at all, therefore, I call it non-hostile, somewhat friendly. You guys had a brief one-post exchange. In this case, they're one in the same.
You're answering a question I didn't ask. Or responding to something I didn't say. Or something. At no point did I say I wasn't on the shottytrain with you. I said I stand by that wagon having decent reasoning (which you just said made sense at the time...). I think the point was that shotty seemed like VI and scum, not one or the other. I don't think that's an issue of "understand the VI mentality".
It didn't have decent reasoning. I said it was horrible for DH 1.0 to do and is something I need to correct in the future. It was bad to lead that lynch and I see exactly where vollkan was coming from, especially now that he flipped town. It's even worse to FOLLOW on a wagon like that.
What?
I didn't see the need for you to bring up your thoughts about me and my scumminess, since I didn't mention that at all...
...I agreed with the lynch. I thought the potential info was useful. Which is what I said when I added the vote. Pretty much everyone on the wagon was saying "hey, either this guy is scum or mason, and either way the info will be useful". Why would I question people who are saying the same thing that I am?
You don't think that "We should lynch the claimed masons" skeevy in the very least? I thought it was a dumb decision to make after reading back up with Skillville. Like I said, not asking questions about it and looking for as much info as possible isn't scummy on it's own, but it certainly didn't help with everything else on the table.
Ok, so I said why I wanted the lynch to happen, but your point of view is...I was lying? Great. If you just assume that everything I say is a lie, then finding scum gets a WHOLE lot easier.
Did you just dodge the fact that I pointed out that you'd have to have known there was a protective role in order for your logic to work, which you have never pointed out in the first place?
There is _absolutely_ nothing that I said today that you can read and get "I don't know that DH has replaced Aldusskel". There isn't. If you got that, you read it wrong. Game over. Insert coin.
This didn't make much sense to me. Rephrase it. This is a lot like my viewpoint on how you handled the mason lynch. It didn't make you scummy looking, but it doesn't help your case.
Did you really ask me if I think the person I'm voting for is scum?
I have Zach as a strong townread. Are you asking me because of VC analysis?
So, do me a favor.
Read this. You wrote this:
Reck and hito's presence on the DH v1.0 and the NS lynchwagons rules out them both being scum.
That is fine and good.
Also, this:
Hmm... considering that Al had been drifting through the game without providing much, I don't think we can make a hard judgement about DHv2.0's alignment yet.
Also fine and good.
Here is the problem:
Nikanor is 100% proven town. Lets assume that you are town for a second. There are two scum left in a 12 person game most likely, as is the case in most mini normals.
If you think that their presence on DH 1.0's wagon and NS's lynch rules them
out
of being scum, that leaves two people: Zach and I. If that's the case, why aren't you suspecting Zach more, regardless of the read you have on him?
Unless you mean "rules out them both being scum" as in "one or the other can be scum, but not both", that's just a case of misunderstanding and vagueness. This is important to know, so please tell me if this is the case so I can get the facts straight.