LlamaFluff, 337 wrote:Casus Belli wrote:The problem is we are getting a fresh pair of scummy eyes. The argument is age old, should a fresh replacement be vindicated of their predecessors crimes? We've seen both sides of the argument countless times and I think that distinction is more personal to playstyle.
So you are going to just brush aside what I am going to put up here?
No; that's not what we said (or at least what we intended). We both agreed that we would not remove our vote on you just because you replaced in which contrasts other opinions. That has no bearing on future content, though; just like votes are fluid even without replacements. Your case on jmurph is pretty good as he has been flying under our radar for the entire game. Your posting and content has been very town, so we are now comfortable removing our vote on you now. We wish you would have been here the entire game.
UNVOTE:
LlamaFluff Post 337 wrote:Do you disagree with what I put up on Nacho?
We don't overly disagree with what you posted about Nacho. At the time of his vote on Richard the game had ground to a halt. I don't think a replacement would be able to judge that very well. If nacho is scummy for that what is your opinion on Spyrex?
Reading the thread, your 180 on nacho does strike us as a townie move. Townies are more likely to be flexible with their reads. We have a little voice saying that you are dropping the case because there was no support, but town or scum would probably want to do that.
The case you build against jmurph3 is pretty compelling, we hadn't noticed any deep connections between her and CES but we will take a look at that.
We are not particularly understanding the FakeGod shift at this point, though.
LlamaFluff, 338 wrote:Im borderline pulling a skitzo move right now wondering if Nacho was just making a very stupid move with the putting RGHP at L-1 right after the Spy move.
We don't really think it was that bold of a move. The intent to hammer was there, and Richard just brushed it off.
Substrike22, 341 wrote:I think Fake was going to be the casualty of opportunity. If you look at Mas' wall of textpwn where he outlines his arguments on everyone, most of his arguments against Fake are WIFOM; he was taking advantage of an opportunity, based on town-lead suspicion on FakeGod. Scum was trying to push a lynch anywhere but on himself.
What do you mean by a "town-lead" suspicion?
LlamaFluff, 360 wrote:Still not too happy with the wagons right now. M is probably town, FG is one of my wildcards at this point. I am getting somewhat sure that the scum in this game are in a combo of jmurph/CES/reck/sub (note jmurph-CES are far and away best partner pick in the game, I hope that doesnt need explaining). I will be floored if more then one scum is out of that group with Spy, nacho and M being town.
If you wouldn't mind giving us a quick rundown since neither of us recall the connection it would be beneficial to us. Do you think lynching one will give more information on the other? SpyreX has also commented about CES being scummy, plus our suspicion, and yours. That's three votes on CES which finally makes it a viable wagon.
VOTE: CES
We caught them all!