masfloohinev (3) - Substrike22, FakeGod, Reckamonic
FakeGod (3) - Cogito Ergo Sum, masfloohinev, jmurph3
LlamaFluff (2) - SpyreX, Casus Belli,
jmurph3 (2) - Llamafluff, Nachomamma8
Not voting: No one!
With 10 alive it takes 6 to lynch.
Didn't mean to skip it, sorry.Nachomamma8 wrote:jmurph, don't forget the question in 366.
I think this is referring to my post where I FOSed Mas in D1? If so, I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. I didn't make a vote at all in that post. I had voted Shotty during RVS, and my explanation in that post was that while I found Mas scummy, I wanted to keep my vote on Shotty...so I guess that while my gut made me lean toward Mas, my logic made me think Shotty was my top suspect? Does that make sense? Again, I'm not even sure if this is where you were going with this.Nachomamma8 wrote:Wait, what? I'd say that mas being your top suspect is a safe assumption. If not, then why wouldn't you mention your top suspect when making your first serious vote?
No; that's not what we said (or at least what we intended). We both agreed that we would not remove our vote on you just because you replaced in which contrasts other opinions. That has no bearing on future content, though; just like votes are fluid even without replacements. Your case on jmurph is pretty good as he has been flying under our radar for the entire game. Your posting and content has been very town, so we are now comfortable removing our vote on you now. We wish you would have been here the entire game.LlamaFluff, 337 wrote:So you are going to just brush aside what I am going to put up here?Casus Belli wrote:The problem is we are getting a fresh pair of scummy eyes. The argument is age old, should a fresh replacement be vindicated of their predecessors crimes? We've seen both sides of the argument countless times and I think that distinction is more personal to playstyle.
We don't overly disagree with what you posted about Nacho. At the time of his vote on Richard the game had ground to a halt. I don't think a replacement would be able to judge that very well. If nacho is scummy for that what is your opinion on Spyrex?LlamaFluff Post 337 wrote:Do you disagree with what I put up on Nacho?
We don't really think it was that bold of a move. The intent to hammer was there, and Richard just brushed it off.LlamaFluff, 338 wrote:Im borderline pulling a skitzo move right now wondering if Nacho was just making a very stupid move with the putting RGHP at L-1 right after the Spy move.
What do you mean by a "town-lead" suspicion?Substrike22, 341 wrote:I think Fake was going to be the casualty of opportunity. If you look at Mas' wall of textpwn where he outlines his arguments on everyone, most of his arguments against Fake are WIFOM; he was taking advantage of an opportunity, based on town-lead suspicion on FakeGod. Scum was trying to push a lynch anywhere but on himself.
If you wouldn't mind giving us a quick rundown since neither of us recall the connection it would be beneficial to us. Do you think lynching one will give more information on the other? SpyreX has also commented about CES being scummy, plus our suspicion, and yours. That's three votes on CES which finally makes it a viable wagon.LlamaFluff, 360 wrote:Still not too happy with the wagons right now. M is probably town, FG is one of my wildcards at this point. I am getting somewhat sure that the scum in this game are in a combo of jmurph/CES/reck/sub (note jmurph-CES are far and away best partner pick in the game, I hope that doesnt need explaining). I will be floored if more then one scum is out of that group with Spy, nacho and M being town.
Yeah! We caught them all!Nachomamma8 wrote:So the entire scumteam is on your wagon?
FakeGod's Role PM wrote:Vanilla Townie:
You are a vanilla townie. You possess no powers other than your brain and your vote, use them wisely. You win when you eliminate all threats to the town.