vote: WeirdRa
Posting in other game, brb.
This case is entirely misrep. How is it double standards, when both the posts are in response to wraith and are along the same train of thought? Please do not take my posts out of context.VasudeVa wrote:
Katsuki is scum!
Evidence #1:Attacks on Wraith.
This is the biggest reason I suspect her. Her attacks on Wraith are staged. She doesn't really believe that Wraith is scum(because, you know. She's scum and she has to fake attack townies to look like she's scumhunting). I mean, srsly
She went from this:To this:ISO#18 wrote:OR, IF YOU DON'T START BUSSING NOW, YOU TOO WILL GET ROPE.
I totally forgot to add you onto my scum list for trying to duck out of stuff... = = (Were on my list last night)
in 40 mins! Double standards much? If she really thought that Wraith was scum, she wouldn't give him this advice. Of course, an explanation for this is that she may be looking for connections. But I don't think so. I've only ever played with Katsuki once (She was my scumqueen in that game), and she strikes me as an aggressive player who would want to lynch as soon as possible. That theory does not fit with her personality.ISO#19 wrote:Well, I'm not against the bandwagoning. I wouldn't give you flak for that.
I said somethingto this effect a while ago, minus all the analysis.Glork wrote:DGB's posts especially come across as someone who isn't really trying, just going through the motions. Her suspicions are very run-of-the-mill, and she seems to be making a concerted effort not to draw anyone's ire.Mariyta wrote:What makes you certain? I have a neutral reading at the moment, leaning town.Glork wrote:I'm decently certain Drippereth is scum.
What really seals the deal for me is that in the same post where I said they were starting to look like scum, DGB quoted and commented on another part of the post and completely, 100% ignored my voiced suspicion of her, which isVERYunlike DGB-town.
Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Mod, just out of curiosity, does Dekes' unvote in #729 count?
This gives me bad vibes. I do agree that zwetchenwasser will be a burden on the town if he keeps playing this way, but zwetchenwasser is a very difficult person to read and it could be just him exhibiting more of his VIness. It looks way too much of a policy/easy lynch to me to be comfortable with lynching him as opposed to just vigging him tonight so we won't have to deal with him.Mariyta wrote:This made me LOL. I think we have our lynch candidate for tomorrow if we don't have a vig to help us out tonight.
I can see where you are coming from, although I never did say we should only look at who Katsuki interacted with/the list, but that Katsuki's interactions with other people/Katsuki's list would give us the most information on Katsuki's scumbuddy if Katsuki flips scum.Nero Cain wrote:Indeed. Wich is why I believe Kat took VV and possibly Wraith off her list. Yes upon Kat scum flip we should deffiantly look at interactions but it would be dangerous to only look at her list/interactions 'cause we don't know that they are listed/had interactions with her. We will revisit this after flip.
Again, I can see where you are coming from, although you saying that even if Katsuki flipped scum that it might not be a chainsaw defense looks if you weren't confident in your statement.Nero Cain wrote:I do not believe this is a contradiction. I did not change my original assumption that it feels like/looks like chainsaw. The way I interpreted Glork's post was that he was saying that I was premature in calling chainsaw.
I agree with my other head that Katsuki is the best lynch for today, although my suspicion gap on Katsuki and others are narrower compared to my other head.Nero Cain wrote:Your other head is voting Kat. How does this head feel about Kat?
Disagree with this. While thirty pages is certainly an active Day 1, we also got a lot of information out of it and more things to be able to properly analyze people's contents in the game and if the player resembles a scum or a townie.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:P.S. 30 page Day 1's are anti-town.
So you're saying that if a "slip" were to occur, you expect that person to be top suspect on many people's list soon after? For me to switch to a person due to a slip, it depends on the severity of the slip and if the player has been playing scummy previously. If I think that person stands a good chance of flipping scum due to his behavior and that the slip is damning enough that it would most likely come out of a Mafia member, then I would happily switch my vote over. However, I don't believe a "slip" should automatically mean a vote. I won't switch my vote immediately to a person who I thought was town who made a slip that could be based off a commonplace in Mafia games, not exact information that only scums could know themselves.WeirdRa wrote:LMP is scum, but so is Gandalf. Gandalf makes a slip. LMP just plays obvscum. You lynch slips first.
I'm not saying that Wraith's relatively pro-town behavior recently completely cleans him of the things he's done and his mostly lack of scum hunting back then, I still look at past actions that people do and they still matter in terms of scum hunting and evidence supporting that a person is scum.gandalf5166 wrote:Wait, because Wraith started sccumhunting in the last few pages, he's now town? You realize that you just admitted he didn't scumhunt at all for the first TWENTY-FIVE PAGES, right? There's too many scum around here. I just can't vote them all.
Call me Vas, ;D A little less active than I used to be due to IRL. Hoping to be back up to speed soon-ish!
React to what? You posted that AFTER I posted that my vote was on Weird and wouldn't move. I assumed you saw that and didn't bother with me. Or maybe you would prefer...VasudeVa wrote: @MemoriaEscumnia: I left Mariyta out because I'm waiting on her to react. 8D. Mariytaa, where are yoouuuuu~ React react!
Explain why you aren't voting WeirdRa.zwetschenwasser wrote:Drip explain why the * is there.
Wouldn't the better question be: Why are the people on the WierdRa wagon voting WierdRa?inHimshallibe wrote:Explain why you aren't voting WeirdRa.zwetschenwasser wrote:Drip explain why the * is there.
Actually, I'd like everyone not voting WeirdRa to tell me why they aren't.