Bird1111 wrote:
5. The Newbie Queue rules now require a non-retractable 3 week deadline per day, thus this game will have one. At deadline, a majority of people who have posted in thread within the last 48 hours and are not currently being replaced will be enough for a lynch. A player may also choose to not have their vote count at deadline if they are too busy to make an informed vote at deadline. If you choose this, I will inform the game that you have made this choice as soon as I am aware of it. I will add a section to all votecounts, separate from the main one of the votes of people who have posted within the last 48 hours. For example, let's say there are five people alive, Bob, Alice, Carol, David, and Erica, and Fredrick. Let's say that only Bob, Alice, David, Erica, and Frederick have posted within the last 48 hours at deadline but I am currently searching for a replacement for David and Frederick has requested that his vote not be counted. This would mean that two of Bob, Alice, and Erica would have to be voting the same person at deadline for a lynch to go through.
Kind of complicated. Depending on what people are doing at the deadline, it may result in either a lynch or a no-lynch.
Olinea wrote:
2. Is it considered bad sportsmanship to hammer yourself if you think it'll help the town? For example, if we're close to the deadline, and I've got 4 votes, would it be a... erm... "dick move" to hammer myself so on Day 2 there'd be a 2/7 chance of finding scum rather than 2/8?
I'm not sure. It's definitely anti-town to hammer yourself out of indignation or frustration. For one, you kill a townie if you are one, and might not have been killed otherwise. Two, you rob the town of information (ie- who would have dropped the hammer otherwise). Third (though there are probably more reasons not to do this that I'm not aware of), if a scum has not voted for you, but might, you spare them having to put their name on the wagon (which could be especially useful if they hammer quickly or without much explanation or thought given to it). You're basically helping the scum beat your team.
With regards to your specific scenario/example, I would not be surprised if that has come up before, or if someone has done that. But it would just be better if we don't let it come to that.
A no-lynch is about the worst thing that you can let happen in D-1 of a newbie game.
No suspicions or cases are resolved, no new information is gained, you lose one townie and then are plopped right back to where you were. The lynch pool is larger (statistical probability of getting a scum on the next lynch is lower), you now need 5 votes instead of 4 to lynch a scum, and you don't buy yourself any time numbers wise. Another Day 8-2 (1 mislynch, 1 NightKill), leaves you at 4town to 2scum for D-3. Still a loss at that point if you miss. Though you could no-lynch then to eliminate one suspect. But you've still missed one of the town's chances to get a LOT of information.
It is pretty important that everyone understand that a no-lynch D-1 in a 9 player game is literally the WORST that we can do.
Nevermind: Definitely do not claim until you're at L-1 and threatened with a hammer. This is the only time a single person should claim their role, unless they are a PR at a critical moment.
I'm hesitant to single-out and run Nevermind up right now, because he's not the only inactive player (Caterpillar and Yoenit have also been quiet). Though, arguably, Nevermind is the guiltiest of lurking. But he's not the only one.