Also,
I'm confident in my read here.
This is true pretty much regardless of game. I don't think we've ever been on the same side. No lynch is still the way to go today, and I still hold Hind as my top suspect (but Andrius has moved into my top 3 after his vote on me when we should be no lynching.Charlie wrote:If Andrius is mafia then Twomz is town
If Andrius is town then Twomz is mafia
Sounds a lot like you're flailing Parama.Parama wrote:ALSO.
Why are people voting in MyLo? I'm going to be NLing until the scum get the balls to kill someone, even if it a takes a whole damn year. Discussion is fine but the discussion that's happened during today has been mostly useless crap. We sat around waiting for Nicol for a week, then he got replaced, and now we're sitting around and waiting for Charlie to make biased and opportunistic cases on me to try and push a ML on me tomorrow after he kills obvtown Xite tonight while hanging out with his buddies vollkan and Andrius.
THERE IS NO GOOD REASON TO LYNCH IN MYLO WHEN WE'RE ALMOST 100% SURE THERE ARE NO POWER ROLES (P.S. - There aren't unless they've been doing a terrible job protecting, investigating, tracking, watching etc. because I don't believe it for a second that we don't have anyone confirmed town due to roles AND these roles that could confirm townies exist)
Sorry, I lost all my tabs, so I stopped cross-referencing for a bit, but I just pulled them all back up, and... wait, where did you say that? I can't find it anywhere.Parama wrote:Um, I've told you in our QT that you're my strongest town read. Twice, I think. <_<
How is wanting a NL a bad thing when the scum are too big of wimps to kill in 8p? Personally, I always kill even if it would take MyLo into LyLo. I don't see much of a difference.
Actually, we bothTwomz wrote:This is true pretty much regardless of game. I don't think we've ever been on the same side. No lynch is still the way to go today, and I still hold Hind as my top suspect (but Andrius has moved into my top 3 after his vote on me when we should be no lynching.Charlie wrote:If Andrius is mafia then Twomz is town
If Andrius is town then Twomz is mafia
Way to avoid the other part of that...Parama wrote:The post you called "flailing" was about wanting to NL <_<
Oh, lol sorry I must have skipped over that line.Parama wrote:Read the QT again.
Specifically, #11. Where I said that you and maybe [REDACTED] are my only town reads.
I don't know, because I asked? (At least I think I did)Parama wrote:Why would I waste my time explaining my town reads?
I've seen nothing in your posts or you behavior to make me think you're scum; you've done some stupid stuff but your effort seems genuine.
Parama in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2530096#p2530096]#1423[/url] wrote:I've seen nothing in your posts or you behavior to make me think you're scum; you've done some stupid stuff but your effort seems genuine.
Within a span of 7 posts and 1 page, you've seemingly made a contradiction. I don't like it.Parama in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2530866#p2530866]#1438[/url] wrote:"some effort" You can't judge the effort players put into their posts FYI.
If you say so.Parama wrote:When I posted my catchup post, I had just finished with doing a massive catchup post in another game. I was totally tired of making textwall so I was rather succint.
THEN THE PRECEDENT HAS BEEN BROKEN!!!!Andrius wrote:Actually, we bothTwomz wrote:This is true pretty much regardless of game. I don't think we've ever been on the same side. No lynch is still the way to go today, and I still hold Hind as my top suspect (but Andrius has moved into my top 3 after his vote on me when we should be no lynching.Charlie wrote:If Andrius is mafia then Twomz is town
If Andrius is town then Twomz is mafiastartedComedy of Whims on the same side.
BZZZZT. I did not judge the AMOUNT of effort, only the genuinity of the effort. Huuuge difference.Charlie wrote:Going to resume reading now, but I feel I need to reply to these:
Parama in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2530096#p2530096]#1423[/url] wrote:I've seen nothing in your posts or you behavior to make me think you're scum; you've done some stupid stuff but your effort seems genuine.Within a span of 7 posts and 1 page, you've seemingly made a contradiction. I don't like it.Parama in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2530866#p2530866]#1438[/url] wrote:"some effort" You can't judge the effort players put into their posts FYI.
...linked the post I was talking about...Charlie wrote:If you say so.Parama wrote:When I posted my catchup post, I had just finished with doing a massive catchup post in another game. I was totally tired of making textwall so I was rather succint.
My honest suspicions, yes.Charlie wrote:but the important bit is Parama suspects Sando, Twomz's slot (Ray), vollkan @ #513.
Dear god are you people not seeing this. He's trying to scumlink based on a meta comment (guess what I hate meta). Do you even know what distancing implies? Calling another player town doesn't exactly imply distancing.Charlie wrote:Page 25: Parama enforces a VasudeVa/Sando/Prana scumteam in #602. Andrius uses some meta and says Parama is not scum in #605. Now I'll remind you people that I think these two are mafia; and this interaction can be viewed as scumbuddies distancing. FoS both Parama and Andrius for this.
...Charlie wrote:Page 26: At this point I've noticed that Andrius makes a lot more posts as compared to Twomz's slot (my opposing mafia read). I can view Twomz's slot as lurkish; thus diluting the apparent "scumminess" caused earlier by Andrius.
This is just Charlie trying to look good.Charlie wrote:Page 28: I don't understand the Sando wagon because the discussion was filled with lots of empty content posts.
Ooor Andrius/vollkan are the scum on the wagon.Charlie wrote:Sando (7) –Max, Andrius, vollkan, Parama, tazaro (Hinduragi),ReaperCharlie,PranaDevil
So nothing much has changed my opinion about both Andrius and Parama being mafia at this point because they both are on the wagon. A few more replacements enter the game.
Honest logic, bro. I know how it looks, but it's exactly what I feel.Charlie wrote:Page 30: I have a problem with Parama's #726 which I find deceptive i.e. something mafia would say. Discussion is renewed here (finally!)
A failtown posting a weak case on me automatically makes me scummier? What kind of world do you live in?
*switches vote one time from one strong scum read to the next, first post of the page.Charlie wrote:Page 36: Parama*does some vote hopping.
Lol, people posting a case on me automatically makes me scummier.Charlie wrote:Possible tactic to clear himself? Inclined to like Xite's #916: Parama is STILL the correct lynch. At the end of the page, emotions appear to take over: Parama, Andrius, and Xite91 all post in a different tone.
Can't say I believe you there.Parama wrote:BZZZZT. I did not judge the AMOUNT of effort, only the genuinity of the effort. Huuuge difference.
Oh gosh; that "If you say so" wasn't an attack, learn to read in context! Your over defensiveness in this matter is suspicious to me.Parama wrote:...linked the post I was talking about...
Which you took out in this quote. Nice job.
Look, not everything I say about you is "scummy" or attacking you. My analysis consists of a mixture of suspicions, pro-town behavior, gut reads and others... You are overreacting to nothing.Parama wrote:My honest suspicions, yes.
Wait, how's that scummy?
1) I get that you don't like meta; and I don't like it also for I feel it isn't worth the effort. In the event that it is available, I'll apply a subjective view towards it. Moreso of the fact that I'll have to take a person's word for it and look back at the meta-ed game.Parama wrote:Dear god are you people not seeing this. He's trying to scumlink based on a meta comment (guess what I hate meta). Do you even know what distancing implies? Calling another player town doesn't exactly imply distancing.
Also again you're saying I gave my scumreads but don't say what the problem is with that.
Oh my lord, you are clearly not reading the whole thing or you've missed out on important details. I just said what you said above there, you didn't notice it? Go find it yourself; I'm not linking it for your apathetic/lazy behavior.Parama wrote:...
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Active posting =/= pro-town by default. What if someone posted 5 posts in a row, but they were all fluff? By your logic, they're more pro-town than the guy who posted once but with content.
Oh no, he found out my secret!Parama wrote:This is just Charlie trying to look good.
Can't really blame you for saying this; you're defending yourself by pointing out the other possibilities. Changes nothing.Parama wrote:Ooor Andrius/vollkan are the scum on the wagon.
You do realize that you're my top suspicion along with Andrius, no?Parama wrote:Honest logic, bro. I know how it looks, but it's exactly what I feel.
If it's advocating an Andrius lynch (who you have a scum read on) why do you care, though?
C'mon, only you think that's failtown. Don't project your opinions directly on me; convince and not force. You're certainly not pro-town for this.Parama wrote:A failtown posting a weak case on me automatically makes me scummier? What kind of world do you live in?
Yeah, vote hopping!Parama wrote:*switches vote one time from one strong scum read to the next, first post of the page.
If you say soParama wrote:Lol, people posting a case on me automatically makes me scummier.
Why don't I go BS a case on every player in this game? I could totally do it, but it wouldn't prove anything.
Man Charlie your logic is weaker than vollkan's was at the start of the game.
GUYS.Charlie wrote:
1. Vollkan
2. Parama
3. Andrius
4. Twomz
5. VasudeVa
6. Hinduragi
7. Xite91
Since there is just too much at stake to risk a vollkan lynch Today, and the added fact that I'm not impressed with Parama's recent attention span to my posts:
UNVOTE: vollkan
VOTE: Parama
...but what I said here is exactly what I said before. You were attacking me for a "lack" of effort, implying amount. I said you couldn't judge effort that way.Charlie wrote:Final leg of reading, but as usual I always check the latest posts to respond to:
Can't say I believe you there.Parama wrote:BZZZZT. I did not judge the AMOUNT of effort, only the genuinity of the effort. Huuuge difference.
"If you say so" always implies mistrust to me. I usually just put a <_< after it to make it more obvious what I mean <_<Charlie wrote:Oh gosh; that "If you say so" wasn't an attack, learn to read in context! Your over defensiveness in this matter is suspicious to me.Parama wrote:...linked the post I was talking about...
Which you took out in this quote. Nice job.
I post my scumreads - the only reasons you'd mention that is if you had something to say about it.Charlie wrote:Look, not everything I say about you is "scummy" or attacking you. My analysis consists of a mixture of suspicions, pro-town behavior, gut reads and others... You are overreacting to nothing.Parama wrote:My honest suspicions, yes.
Wait, how's that scummy?
1. mmkCharlie wrote:1) I get that you don't like meta; and I don't like it also for I feel it isn't worth the effort. In the event that it is available, I'll apply a subjective view towards it. Moreso of the fact that I'll have to take a person's word for it and look back at the meta-ed game.Parama wrote:Dear god are you people not seeing this. He's trying to scumlink based on a meta comment (guess what I hate meta). Do you even know what distancing implies? Calling another player town doesn't exactly imply distancing.
Also again you're saying I gave my scumreads but don't say what the problem is with that.
2) Perhaps I have the terminology wrong; its not distancing then... the opposite of bussing? Coaching, perhaps?
3) Once again, you view this as an attack when it is not. Read in context, please.
Oh my lord, you are clearly not reading the whole thing or you've missed out on important details. I just said what you said above there, you didn't notice it? Go find it yourself; I'm not linking it for your apathetic/lazy behavior.[/quote]Parama wrote:...
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Active posting =/= pro-town by default. What if someone posted 5 posts in a row, but they were all fluff? By your logic, they're more pro-town than the guy who posted once but with content.
Pro-tip - townies don't put effort into trying to look town, scum doCharlie wrote:Oh no, he found out my secret!Parama wrote:This is just Charlie trying to look good.
But, looking at your most recent post, you'd be totally fine believing thisCharlie wrote:Can't really blame you for saying this; you're defending yourself by pointing out the other possibilities. Changes nothing.Parama wrote:Ooor Andrius/vollkan are the scum on the wagon.
And there are 3 scum. I fail to see your point.Charlie wrote:You do realize that you're my top suspicion along with Andrius, no?Parama wrote:Honest logic, bro. I know how it looks, but it's exactly what I feel.
If it's advocating an Andrius lynch (who you have a scum read on) why do you care, though?
I'd define vezok as failtown (no offense)Charlie wrote:C'mon, only you think that's failtown. Don't project your opinions directly on me; convince and not force. You're certainly not pro-town for this.Parama wrote:A failtown posting a weak case on me automatically makes me scummier? What kind of world do you live in?
...Charlie wrote:Yeah, vote hopping!Parama wrote:*switches vote one time from one strong scum read to the next, first post of the page.
Why, yes I do.Charlie wrote:If you say soParama wrote:Lol, people posting a case on me automatically makes me scummier.
Why don't I go BS a case on every player in this game? I could totally do it, but it wouldn't prove anything.
Man Charlie your logic is weaker than vollkan's was at the start of the game.
I leaned away from this earlier, but I just noticed a Charlie/vollkan/Andrius team fits with this too ^.^Charlie wrote:Page 43: Mmmh, Parama's setup speculation... at #1050. Right, I know that setup speculations are notorious for being misleading; but I personally feel it is okay to some extent (not to mention fun to guess around a bit). Based on the seperations, a Parama/Twomz/VasudaVa mafia team fits. Otherwise, Andrius/Vollkan/VasudaVa. But the rest of the page sums up popular opinion: this isn't reliable because it could all be easily randomized. The rest of the page show some connections between players, but I'm not sure how to connect the dots because we lack a mafia flip.
d(''d)Charlie wrote:Page 46: ... It leads us to vollkan's #1136 which is terrible! He ends up in a worse position than VasudaVa. Aside from his vebrose post, he's trying to sell his points of view and make it sound like a fact. That's bull crap right there. Vote vote vote!
Following that he has a Wall of Quotes/Wall of text which is also unimpressive. Who are you hoping to convince with those points? And no I don't buy what he's selling. I'm more confident that vollkan's manipulating mafia at this point. This or he's so caught up in doing "townie analysis" to the point that he's blinded by the fact that not everything is black and white logic in Mafia.